GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
388,405
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,522

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

If gaming capability is so closely balanced, this comparison between Intel's Arc A350M graphics and NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPU becomes increasingly interesting. Each graphics cards exchange leads across different games. This total assessment is one of impressive equivalence. Neither comes out as a undisputed winner. The determination relies on individual needs.

Over obsessing on slight performance differences, potential builders could evaluate additional factors. thermal performance, acoustics, design, and support coverage usually play a role larger than minor frame rate variations. All these variables can tip the decision. Consider beyond merely performance. The full picture counts.

Over obsessing on minor FPS gains, future users can examine additional variables. thermal performance, cooling, materials, and warranty options often count greater than slight performance differences. These elements should affect the decision. Think more than just frame rates. This whole value proposition matters.

All things considered, this evaluation between Intel's Arc A350M graphics and NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPU results in a virtual stalemate. Benchmark differences are minimal and unlikely to impact actual sessions. Direct your selection on value, ecosystem preferences, and specific feature priorities. The two are capable selections. The draw is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
RTX 6000D
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
19,968 +2500.0%
Shaders
768
19,968 +2500.0%
TMUs
48
624 +1200.0%
ROPs
24
192 +700.0%
SM Count
156
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2430 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
84 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
86,016 +2000.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
64 bit
448 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
1.57 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
128 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
466.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
1,516.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
97.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
156 +2500.0%
Tensor Cores
624
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
600 W
TDP (W)
25
600 +2300.0%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
DG2-128
GB202
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
92,200 million
Die Size
157 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A350M Details View RTX 6000D Details