GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 610M

CORE STATE Mendocino
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2550 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
4,535
175,286
geekbench_vulkan
6,353
194,041

Analysis: AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

For this graphics card showdown, the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA establishes its leadership obviously. If you're rendering at 1440p, the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA consistently beats Radeon AMD Radeon 610M by notable margins. This benchmark margin expands notably greater at higher resolutions. The graphics card handles intensive workloads with ease. Its architectural benefits are evident.

When it comes to RT, the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA moves even more beyond of Radeon AMD Radeon 610M. Its RT hardware handle demanding reflection effects considerably more efficiently. Gamers seeking modern effects will definitely pick the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA. This real-time ray tracing capability is notable. Contemporary titles continually leverage RT effects.

When it comes to ray tracing, the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA leaps further forward of Radeon AMD Radeon 610M. The hardware hardware process intensive shadow rendering significantly more smoothly. Users seeking cutting-edge effects might certainly pick the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA. The real-time ray tracing performance is substantial. Contemporary titles more and more use real-time ray tracing features.

When buyers facing a acquisition decision, the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA stands as the suggested choice. Its reliable frame rate edge over Radeon AMD Radeon 610M renders it the better selection for enthusiast buyers. Evaluate your specific use cases, but this results guides toward the RTX 5000 card from NVIDIA. Base an informed choice. The performance delta is significant and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
610M
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
12,800 +9900.0%
Shaders
128
12,800 +9900.0%
TMUs
8
400 +4900.0%
ROPs
4
176 +4300.0%
Compute Units
2
SM Count
100
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1155 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
2550 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
72 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
448.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
1,020.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
486.4 GFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
30.40 GFLOPS (1:16)
1,020.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
972.8 GFLOPS (2:1)
65.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
100 +4900.0%
Tensor Cores
400
Power
TDP
15 W
250 W
TDP (W)
15
250 +1566.7%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Mendocino
AD102
Generation
Navi II IGP (Mendocino Mobile)
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
76,300 million
Die Size
100 mm²
609 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Workstation Ampere
Successor
Navi III IGP
Blackwell PRO W
View Radeon 610M Details View RTX 5000 Ada Generation Details