NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO reveals two devices built for entirely different purposes. The RTX 500 is a 35 W integrated graphics processor designed for thin, portable machines. The LX PRO is a 225 W dual-slot add-in card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The data shows no head-to-head benchmark wins for either side, and both sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. The RTX 500 targets mobile workstations where power efficiency and a compact IGP form factor are non-negotiable. The LX PRO targets desktop workloads demanding high memory capacity and raw throughput, where its larger physical footprint and power draw are acceptable trade-offs. Users needing a self-contained mobile solution should look to the RTX 500. Users building a desktop with ample power delivery and space should consider the LX PRO.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design philosophies. The RTX 500 uses the AD107 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, implementing the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is part of the Ada-MW (x000A) generation. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, implementing the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so a direct density comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

The RTX 500 packs 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The LX PRO is far larger in compute resources: 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX PRO does not list ray tracing or tensor core counts, so those capabilities cannot be compared numerically. The RTX 500 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but its Vulkan support is 1.3. The RTX 500 has a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The power envelopes could not be more different. The RTX 500 has a 35 W TDP and uses no external power connectors, fitting the IGP slot width classification. The LX PRO draws 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin connector, and occupies a dual-slot width. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RTX 500 has no listed dimensions, consistent with its mobile integrated design.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing. Both GPUs have an average benchmark score of zero, and neither has any nearest rivals listed. This absence of measured data means the analysis must rely on architectural specifications rather than performance tests.

The raw throughput figures tell a clear story. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, exactly three times the 8.294 TFLOPS of the RTX 500. In FP16, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 500 provides 8.294 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO has 6 times the FP16 throughput of the RTX 500, a gap that matters for mixed-precision workloads. The pixel rate favors the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 64.80 GPixel/s for the RTX 500. The texture rate shows the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s against 129.6 GTexel/s for the RTX 500. Each metric indicates the LX PRO holds a 3x or greater advantage in raw fill and compute rates.

Memory capacity and bandwidth follow the same pattern. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 500 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s. The LX PRO offers 6 times the capacity and 3.375 times the bandwidth. The memory clocks also differ: the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the RTX 500 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The clock advantage for the LX PRO is 12.5% on the memory side.

Boost clocks are only listed for the RTX 500: 2025 MHz, with a base of 1485 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded, so a direct frequency comparison is impossible. The RTX 500's thermal and power design allows it to operate within a 35 W envelope, which is a fraction of the LX PRO's 225 W requirement. The ratio of FP32 performance per watt favors the RTX 500 substantially: 8.294 TFLOPS divided by 35 W yields roughly 0.237 TFLOPS per watt, while the LX PRO yields 24.58 TFLOPS divided by 225 W, about 0.109 TFLOPS per watt. The RTX 500 is about 2.17 times more efficient in raw FP32 per watt based on the recorded specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, which is exactly 3 times the 2048 shading units found in the NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 500 has 4 GB of GDDR6. The LX PRO provides 6 times the capacity.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 500 has a 35 W TDP and uses no external power connectors. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The RTX 500 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the physical form factor differences?

A: The RTX 500 is classified as an IGP with no listed dimensions. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Q: Is there any benchmark data available for direct comparison?

A: The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing. Both GPUs have an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals listed, so all comparisons rely on specification data.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation wins in scenarios defined by portability and efficiency. Its 35 W TDP makes it suitable for compact devices where thermal management is constrained. The IGP slot width and absence of power connectors mean the GPU can be integrated into systems without discrete power cabling. The 5 nm TSMC process and 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die indicate a dense, modern design. The 1:1 FP16 ratio at 8.294 TFLOPS provides consistent performance across FP16 and FP32 workloads without the need for special conversion paths. The Vulkan 1.4 support is the newer API version, which may benefit applications targeting the latest Vulkan extensions. For mobile workstations where battery life and heat dissipation are priorities, the RTX 500's 35 W envelope is a decisive advantage.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in scenarios demanding maximum compute and memory. Its 24 TB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large datasets that would exceed the RTX 500's 4 GB allocation. The 192-bit bus width provides a wider path for memory-intensive operations. The FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS position the LX PRO for high-throughput compute tasks. The 2:1 FP16 ratio means the LX PRO can double its rate when operating in FP16 mode, a feature absent from the RTX 500's 1:1 ratio. The dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin connector and 550 W suggested PSU indicates the LX PRO expects a desktop power infrastructure. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor desktop configurations, while the RTX 500's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in every major specification category. The process node shows 5 nm for the RTX 500 versus 6 nm for the LX PRO, both from TSMC. The RTX 500 has a known transistor count of 18,900 million and a die size of 159 mm², while the LX PRO lists both as unknown. The transistor density for the RTX 500 is 118.9M per mm²; no density is recorded for the LX PRO.

Clock specifications only partially overlap. The RTX 500 has a base clock of 1485 MHz and a boost clock of 2025 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks differ: the RTX 500 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration shows the largest gaps. The RTX 500 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The compute resources follow: 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs for the RTX 500; 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs for the LX PRO. The RTX 500 includes 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists no RT or tensor core counts.

The power and physical specifications could not be more divergent. The RTX 500 has a 35 W TDP, IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, a 1x 16-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX 500 uses PCIe 4.0 x8; the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the RTX 500, while the LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX PRO has dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm; the RTX 500 has no listed dimensions. The API support differs only in Vulkan version: 1.4 for the RTX 500, 1.3 for the LX PRO. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.