GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A530M

CORE STATE DG2-256
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz
TDP 65 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2175 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 160 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
49,735
146,593
geekbench_vulkan
43,492
123,842

Analysis: Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Analyzing the test figures for RTX 4000 by NVIDIA and the Arc A530M, an obvious trend emerges. RTX 4000 by NVIDIA repeatedly produces stronger scores in our evaluation. This speed advantage ranges from substantial to impressive based on the particular game. This steadiness speaks to core design advantages. Users prioritizing graphics performance will take note.

Playing games benchmarks in different games steadily favor RTX 4000 by NVIDIA. Whether it's fast-paced scenarios to demanding productions, RTX 4000 by NVIDIA preserves its advantage. This frame rate reliability across multiple scenarios proves inherent engineering improvements. Users can anticipate solid results independent of game type. This flexibility is impressive.

The VRAM edge of RTX 4000 by NVIDIA becomes progressively relevant at demanding resolutions. High resolution workloads demands substantial video memory, and RTX 4000 by NVIDIA has greater buffer. This translates into enhanced gameplay in heavy games. Modern software can increasingly require more graphics memory. The benefit increases over the years.

Ultimately: RTX 4000 by NVIDIA takes this showdown convincingly. Those seeking visual performance might definitely choose RTX 4000 by NVIDIA over the Arc A530M. This score numbers validates this conclusion. The workloads might render noticeably smoother. It's a definite champion in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A530M
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,536
6,144 +300.0%
Shaders
1,536
6,144 +300.0%
TMUs
96
192 +100.0%
ROPs
48
64 +33.3%
SM Count
48
Execution Units
192
Clocks
Base Clock
900 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
2175 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
20,480 +150.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
160 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
360.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
8 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
139.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
417.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)
26.73 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
48 +300.0%
Tensor Cores
192
XMX Cores
192
Power
TDP
65 W
130 W
TDP (W)
65
130 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-256
AD104
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile)
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
11,500 million
35,800 million
Die Size
269 mm²
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
42.8M / mm²
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
245 mm 9.6 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
View Arc A530M Details View RTX 4000 Ada Generation Details