NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data separates these two GPUs into entirely different performance classes. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO holds a commanding lead in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 output reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 57% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation's 15.62 TFLOPS. The gap widens further in FP16 work. The LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 3000 Mobile caps at 15.62 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. That represents a 3.1x advantage for the Lisuan part in half-precision workloads.

Texture processing follows the same pattern. The LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s versus 244.1 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA part, a 57% margin. Pixel throughput shows an even larger disparity. The LX PRO renders at 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 136% above the RTX 3000 Mobile's 81.36 GPixel/s. These numbers indicate the Lisuan Tech part is built for sustained compute-heavy rendering, not power-limited mobility.

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation does not win any recorded benchmark category. However, its advantage lies in the mobile form factor. The slot width is IGP, meaning it integrates directly into a portable system. The LX PRO requires a Dual-slot chassis with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX 3000 Mobile uses no external power connectors. This makes the NVIDIA part the only viable option for thin-and-light portable workstations, while the Lisuan Tech part targets stationary desktop configurations.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a TSMC foundry but diverge on process node. The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation uses a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 6 nm. NVIDIA's chip, designated AD106, measures 188 mm² and houses 22,900 million transistors. The LX PRO's chip, labeled 7G105, has unknown transistor count and die size. Transistor density for the NVIDIA part is 121.8M per mm². No density figure exists for the Lisuan part.

The NVIDIA architecture is Ada Lovelace, part of the Ada-MW generation. It integrates 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, and the database records no ray tracing or tensor core counts. This distinction matters for workloads that rely on dedicated RT acceleration or AI tensor operations. The NVIDIA part has explicit hardware for those tasks, while the LX PRO's data does not confirm such units exist.

Memory subsystems differ substantially. The RTX 3000 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. The Lisuan part has 68% more bandwidth and 3x the capacity. Memory clocks also differ: the NVIDIA part runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Shader configuration favors the LX PRO in every count. It has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The RTX 3000 Mobile has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX PRO doubles the ROP count and increases shading units by 33%. API support is nearly identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 57% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation's 15.62 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card provide?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which card supports ray tracing hardware?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation includes 36 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded ray tracing core count in the database.

Q: What power connector does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO require?

A: The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin power connector and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. The NVIDIA part uses no power connectors.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with PCIe 4.0?

A: Yes, both the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s, which is 68% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation's 256.0 GB/s.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Chip | AD106 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Transistors | 22,900 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 188 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.8M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 144 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 36 | Not recorded |

| Tensor Cores | 144 | Not recorded |

| FP32 | 15.62 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| TDP | 115 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width |

| Release Date | 2023-03-20 | 2026-03-16 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The FP16 comparison is the most lopsided metric in the dataset. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO produces 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 3.15x the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation's 15.62 TFLOPS. This indicates the LX PRO uses a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, effectively doubling throughput for half-precision operations. The NVIDIA part operates at a 1:1 ratio, meaning it processes FP16 at the same rate as FP32. For machine learning inference or compute workloads that leverage FP16, the Lisuan part offers a massive advantage.

Pixel throughput shows the second-largest gap. The LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 136% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile's 81.36 GPixel/s. This comes from the LX PRO's 96 ROPs versus 48 ROPs. Rasterization-heavy games or applications that fill large framebuffers will benefit significantly. The RTX 3000 Mobile, with half the ROP count, cannot match this fill rate regardless of clock adjustments.

Texture rate favors the LX PRO by 57%, with 384.0 GTexel/s versus 244.1 GTexel/s. The 192 TMUs on the Lisuan part outnumber the 144 TMUs on the NVIDIA part by 33%. Texture-bound scenes with heavy anisotropic filtering or detailed surface materials will show a clear performance delta. FP32 compute follows the same 57% margin, confirming that the LX PRO scales its advantages proportionally across shader work.

Memory bandwidth gives the LX PRO a 68% edge at 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. Combined with 24 GB of VRAM, the Lisuan part can hold larger textures, geometry buffers, and working sets. The RTX 3000 Mobile's 8 GB capacity will hit limits in memory-intensive scenarios where the LX PRO continues operating. The bandwidth advantage also supports the higher texture and pixel rates, ensuring the memory subsystem does not bottleneck the compute units.

The RTX 3000 Mobile does hold one technical lead. Its 5 nm process node is smaller than the LX PRO's 6 nm node. It also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version than the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3. However, the database records no benchmark wins for the NVIDIA part. Every measured performance metric favors the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The NVIDIA GPU's strengths are contextual: lower power draw at 115 W versus 225 W, no power connectors, and an IGP form factor for portable systems.

The Verdict

The data directs distinct users to each GPU. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the clear choice for stationary workstations that demand maximum compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth position it for rendering, simulation, and data-parallel workloads. The 24 GB memory capacity supports large datasets that would exhaust the NVIDIA part's 8 GB. The dual-slot design and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop-oriented product with no mobility constraints.

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation serves portable systems. Its IGP slot width, lack of power connectors, and 115 W TDP make it suitable for laptops and compact mobile workstations. The 8 GB memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest but functional for mobile scenarios. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, features not confirmed on the Lisuan part. The newer 5 nm process and Vulkan 1.4 support are also technical advantages, though they do not translate into recorded benchmark wins.

The performance gap is substantial. The LX PRO leads by 57% in FP32, 136% in pixel rate, and 68% in bandwidth. Users who prioritize raw speed and memory capacity should select the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Users who require GPU acceleration in a portable chassis have only the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation as a viable option from these two. The release dates reinforce this split: the NVIDIA part launched on 2023-03-20, while the LX PRO arrived on 2026-03-16. Both remain in active production according to the database.