NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition Comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and the NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition occupy completely different corners of the GPU spectrum, despite both carrying NVIDIA branding. The P4000 is a professional workstation card built on the Pascal architecture, designed for stability and specific driver-certified tasks. The TITAN V CEO Edition is a Volta-based behemoth with massive compute resources, aimed at workloads that can leverage its enormous memory pool and tensor core count. Benchmark data shows they rarely compete for the same buyer, but when placed side-by-side, their scores reveal a stark performance hierarchy that goes beyond simple clock speeds.

Where Each One Wins

The TITAN V CEO Edition wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. In the Passmark G2D test, it scores 1086 against the Quadro P4000's 786, a delta of -27.6% in favor of the TITAN. This is a 2D graphics test, but the gap is substantial, indicating that the TITAN's architecture is simply faster at fundamental rasterization tasks. The more important result is in Passmark G3D, where the TITAN scores 16988 versus the P4000's 11466, a -32.5% delta. This 3D benchmark is the clearest indicator of raw rendering power, and the TITAN V CEO Edition is ahead by nearly 50% of the P4000's total score.

The Quadro P4000, however, is not without its own territory. Its benchmark profile is far more extensive, with results in DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute tests. The TITAN V CEO Edition only has two benchmark entries in this data set, which means the P4000 has a track record across a wider range of legacy and modern APIs. For a professional user locked into a specific OpenGL or DirectX 11 workflow, the P4000's scores of 181 in Passmark DirectX 9 and 86 in DirectX 11 show it handles those environments without issue. The TITAN's lack of data in those specific tests means you cannot confirm its performance there from this pack, making the P4000 the safer choice for older, specialized software.

The P4000 also wins on efficiency in a practical sense. Its 105 W TDP and single-slot design make it a drop-in card for dense workstations, while the TITAN's 250 W TDP and dual-slot footprint demand more power and physical space. If your priority is fitting a GPU into a constrained chassis or a system with a modest 300 W power supply, the P4000 is the only viable option here. The TITAN V CEO Edition requires a 600 W suggested PSU and a larger cooler, which is a significant system-level commitment.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two is generational. The Quadro P4000 uses the GP104 chip on the 16 nm Pascal process, manufactured by TSMC. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 314 mm² die, with a transistor density of 22.9M per mm². The TITAN V CEO Edition uses the GV100 chip on the 12 nm Volta process, also from TSMC. This chip is massive: 21,100 million transistors on an 815 mm² die, with a density of 25.9M per mm². The TITAN has nearly three times the transistor count and more than double the die area, which directly explains its dominance in raw compute.

Memory is where the TITAN pulls away decisively. The P4000 has 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 243.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The TITAN V CEO Edition has 32 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus, delivering 868.4 GB/s. That is over 3.5 times the bandwidth and four times the capacity. For large data sets, such as scientific simulations or massive texture arrays, the TITAN is in a different class. The P4000's memory is sufficient for typical CAD or media workloads, but it will run out of headroom quickly in data-heavy tasks.

Compute resources also differ drastically. The P4000 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The TITAN V CEO Edition has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The TITAN also includes 640 tensor cores, which the P4000 lacks entirely. This is critical for AI and machine learning inference. FP32 throughput is 5.304 TFLOPS on the P4000 versus 14.90 TFLOPS on the TITAN, nearly three times higher. FP16 performance is even more lopsided: the P4000 manages only 82.88 GFLOPS at a 1:64 ratio, while the TITAN hits 29.80 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The TITAN's FP16 capability is over 350 times higher, making it the only card here suitable for mixed-precision workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory, and why does that matter?

A: The TITAN V CEO Edition has 32 GB of HBM2 memory, while the Quadro P4000 has 8 GB of GDDR5. The TITAN's larger capacity and 868.4 GB/s bandwidth versus 243.3 GB/s on the P4000 means it can handle far larger datasets without swapping or stalling, which is essential for complex 3D scenes or machine learning training.

Q: Is the TITAN V CEO Edition faster in all benchmark tests?

A: Yes, based on the head-to-head data. The TITAN wins the Passmark G2D test (1086 vs 786) and the Passmark G3D test (16988 vs 11466). The P4000 has scores in more tests, but the TITAN has no losing benchmark in the available comparison.

Q: Can the Quadro P4000 handle AI or tensor-core workloads?

A: No. The P4000 has no tensor cores. The TITAN V CEO Edition has 640 tensor cores, which are designed for AI inference and deep learning. Any workload that requires tensor operations will only run on the TITAN.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The Quadro P4000 has a 105 W TDP and requires a 300 W power supply with a single 6-pin connector. The TITAN V CEO Edition has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply with one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. The TITAN also takes a dual-slot cooler, while the P4000 is single-slot.

Q: Which card is better for older DirectX applications?

A: The data is incomplete for the TITAN, but the P4000 has explicit scores for DirectX 9 (181), DirectX 10 (66), DirectX 11 (86), and DirectX 12 (40). The TITAN has no DirectX-specific scores in this pack, so the P4000 is the verified choice for legacy API compatibility.

Q: How does the TITAN V CEO Edition compare to other GPUs in its percentile range?

A: The TITAN V CEO Edition sits at the 45th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9037. Its nearest rivals include the GeForce GTX 660 (9022) and the GeForce GTX 560 (9058), which are far older cards. This suggests the TITAN's average score is dragged down by its sparse benchmark profile, not its actual capability.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two cards differ, based on the fact pack.

| Specification | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GP104 | GV100 |

| Architecture | Pascal | Volta |

| Generation | Quadro Pascal (Px000) | GeForce 10 |

| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | 21,100 million |

| Die Size | 314 mm² | 815 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 22.9M / mm² | 25.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1202 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1455 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1901 MHz (7.6 Gbps effective) | 848 MHz (1696 Mbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 4096 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 243.3 GB/s | 868.4 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 5120 |

| TMUs | 112 | 320 |

| ROPs | 64 | 128 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 640 |

| Pixel Rate | 94.72 GPixel/s | 186.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 165.8 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.304 TFLOPS | 14.90 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 82.88 GFLOPS (1:64) | 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 105 W | 250 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 600 W |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Height | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | Not specified | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Release Date | 2017-02-05 | 2018-06-20 |

| Predecessor | Quadro Maxwell | GeForce 900 |

| Successor | Quadro Volta | GeForce 20 |

| Launch MSRP | 815 USD | Not available |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two shared benchmarks are Passmark G2D and G3D. In G2D, the TITAN V CEO Edition scores 1086, which is 27.6% higher than the P4000's 786. This is a clean win for the TITAN, and it shows that even in less demanding 2D tasks, the newer architecture has a measurable edge. The margin is not trivial; it is the difference between a card that feels responsive in desktop compositing and one that is merely adequate.

The G3D test is the decisive one. The TITAN scores 16988, which is 32.5% higher than the P4000's 11466. That delta translates to a lead of over 5,500 points. To put that in perspective, the P4000's nearest rivals in the overall average benchmark score are the AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 (9653), the GeForce GTX 960M (9645), and the Quadro K5000 (9637), all within 0.3% of each other. The TITAN's rivals, however, are the GeForce GTX 660 (9022) and the GeForce GTX 560 (9058), which are significantly older. This means the TITAN's G3D score of 16988 is roughly 88% higher than its own average benchmark score of 9037, suggesting that the G3D test captures its true strength, while the P4000's G3D score of 11466 is only about 19% above its average of 9665. The TITAN is not just faster; it is disproportionately faster in the exact test that matters most for gaming and 3D rendering.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the TITAN V CEO Edition is the faster card in every head-to-head comparison. If you need raw 3D performance, FP32 compute, or FP16 throughput, the TITAN's 14.90 TFLOPS and 29.80 TFLOPS are unmatched by the P4000's 5.304 TFLOPS and 82.88 GFLOPS. Its 32 GB of HBM2 memory with 868.4 GB/s bandwidth is also in a different league for large-scale data work. The TITAN is the only choice for machine learning, high-end simulation, or any workload that can use tensor cores.

The Quadro P4000 is the right pick for a different reason: fit and certification. Its 105 W TDP, single-slot design, and 300 W PSU requirement make it a practical option for existing workstations or small form factor builds. Its benchmark profile covers DirectX 9 through 12, OpenCL, and Vulkan, giving you verified performance across a broad software range. The P4000's launch MSRP was 815 USD, which is a data point for reference, but its real value lies in its compatibility and low power draw. If you are running legacy professional applications that do not need massive compute, the P4000 will serve you without forcing a power supply upgrade. For anyone else, the TITAN V CEO Edition is the obvious winner, provided your system can handle its 250 W TDP and dual-slot cooler.