AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA N1X 48SM Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single benchmark result for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M and no benchmark results for the NVIDIA N1X 48SM. The AMD part scores 63,775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA part has no recorded scores, sits at the 50th percentile by default, and carries an average benchmark score of zero. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M holds the only measurable performance data, while the NVIDIA N1X 48SM lacks any direct benchmark evidence.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M’s nearest rivals in the database provide context for its score. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP averages 63,830, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 7600M’s 63,775. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX also averages 63,842, again 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 63,693, which is 0.1% lower than the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 averages 64,212, which is 0.7% higher. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RX 7600M sits in a tightly clustered performance band. Its score is effectively competitive with those four parts, trailing the closest two by a negligible 0.1% and the farthest by 0.7%, while leading one rival by 0.1%.

For the NVIDIA N1X 48SM, there are no nearest rivals and no benchmark scores to compare. The database records an average benchmark score of zero, which means no quantitative performance statement can be made about this GPU. The only definitive information is its percentile placement at 50, which is a placeholder rather than a measured result. The AMD part’s 89th percentile, by contrast, reflects an actual score derived from testing.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two with benchmark data. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 is a concrete figure, whereas the NVIDIA N1X 48SM’s score of zero indicates no recorded results. In terms of raw compute throughput, the AMD part delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA part specifies 28.83 TFLOPS. However, benchmark results are absent for the NVIDIA GPU, so the higher theoretical FP32 number does not translate into any verified performance win.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M also wins on memory bandwidth efficiency relative to its bus width. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has more memory and slightly higher bandwidth, but again, no benchmark confirms how that translates into real-world results.

In terms of actual wins from the database, neither part has a positive win count: winsA is 0 and winsB is 0. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty. The only interpretable outcome is that the AMD GPU has a measured score and the NVIDIA GPU does not. The AMD part’s texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s versus the NVIDIA part’s 900.9 GTexel/s, and the AMD part’s pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s versus the NVIDIA part’s 112.6 GPixel/s. These numbers suggest different strengths, but without NVIDIA benchmark data, the database cannot confirm which part wins in actual workloads.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip is codenamed Hotpink Bonefish and belongs to the Navi Mobile generation of the RX 7000M series. It packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The NVIDIA N1X 48SM uses the GB20B chip, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 382 mm², which is larger than the AMD chip, but its transistor count is listed as unknown. The NVIDIA part belongs to the Blackwell IGP generation with the N1x codename.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The NVIDIA GPU has a base clock of 741 MHz and a boost clock of 2346 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part’s base clock is more than double the NVIDIA part’s base clock, while the boost clocks are closer, differing by 64 MHz in favor of AMD. The AMD memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA memory clock is 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective speed.

Compute unit counts differ by a wide margin. The AMD GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GPU has 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation units, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has roughly 3.4 times as many shading units and 3.4 times as many TMUs, but fewer ROPs. The NVIDIA part also has 48 RT cores compared to the AMD part’s 28, and it includes 192 tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks entirely.

The memory subsystems also diverge. The AMD GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GPU uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 16 times the memory capacity and a wider bus, plus 17.2 GB/s more bandwidth. The AMD part has a higher pixel rate at 154.2 GPixel/s versus 112.6 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA part has a much higher texture rate at 900.9 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s.

FP32 throughput differs as well. The AMD GPU delivers 17.27 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA GPU delivers 28.83 TFLOPS. The AMD GPU supports FP16 at 34.55 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA GPU supports FP16 at 28.83 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part has a higher FP32 figure but a lower FP16 figure. The NVIDIA part supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the AMD part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA part lists one HDMI output, while the AMD part’s display outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the NVIDIA part lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The AMD part has a 90 W TDP, while the NVIDIA part’s TDP is unknown. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors.

The AMD part was released in January 2023 and is the successor to Polaris Mobile. The NVIDIA part has a release date of May 2026, with no predecessor listed. Both are marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The database provides a clear answer for one part and no measurable answer for the other. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 0.7% either direction, confirming that it performs in line with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, NVIDIA CMP 30HX, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, and AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and a placeholder 50th percentile.

For users relying on measured performance, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the only part with data supporting a purchase decision. It offers a verified 63,775 OpenCL score, 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, and 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also has a 90 W TDP, making it a low-power IGP solution. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM, by contrast, has higher theoretical specs in several areas, including 28.83 TFLOPS FP32, 6144 shading units, 128 GB of memory, and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. However, none of those specs are validated by benchmark results in the database.

The data indicates that the AMD part is the safer choice for anyone who values confirmed performance. The NVIDIA part’s higher raw specifications could potentially translate into better performance in certain workloads, particularly those that leverage its 192 tensor cores or 48 RT cores, but the absence of any benchmark score means that potential remains unverified. The AMD part’s 89th percentile placement, based on a real score, is the only performance credential either GPU can claim.

FAQ

Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the NVIDIA N1X 48SM have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark results for the NVIDIA N1X 48SM. Its average benchmark score is zero, and it sits at the 50th percentile by default.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63,842), 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693), and 0.7% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (64,212).

Q: What are the memory specifications of both GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has 6144 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 1792 shading units.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA N1X 48SM delivers 28.83 TFLOPS.