Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Comparison

The Intel Arc A580 and NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super occupy entirely different segments of the GPU market, and the recorded data confirms this. The Arc A580 is a discrete desktop graphics card with substantial compute resources, while the Jetson Orin Nano Super is a compact embedded system-on-module designed for edge applications. Benchmark results show the Arc A580 delivering dramatically higher raw performance, but the Jetson module counters with extreme efficiency and a compact footprint.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct comparison data is limited because the Jetson Orin Nano Super has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel Arc A580, by contrast, has three recorded benchmark results. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A580 scores 2229 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 91657, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 79381. These results place the Arc A580 in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 57756.

The Jetson Orin Nano Super sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no completed tests are available for comparison. This absence of data means the head-to-head picture relies entirely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct performance measurements.

When examining the Arc A580's nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly clustered competitive field. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, which is 0.6% below the Arc A580. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE averages 57367, sitting 0.7% above the Arc A580. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239, 0.8% below, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, 1.1% below. These margins are narrow, placing the Arc A580 in close contention with each of these cards.

For the Jetson Orin Nano Super, the nearest rivals field is empty, leaving no comparative benchmark context. The performance gap between the two products is best understood through raw compute figures. The Arc A580 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Jetson Orin Nano Super delivers 2.089 TFLOPS. That represents a difference of roughly 5.9 times in favor of the Arc A580. FP16 performance follows the same pattern: 24.58 TFLOPS for the Arc A580 versus 4.178 TFLOPS for the Jetson module, a ratio of approximately 5.9 to 1.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A580 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 2.089 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super. The Arc A580 is approximately 5.9 times faster in FP32 and FP16 workloads.

Q: How do their memory systems compare?

A: Both have 8 GB of memory, but the implementations differ significantly. The Arc A580 uses GDDR6 with a 256-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Jetson Orin Nano Super uses LPDDR5 with a 128-bit bus and 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, giving the Arc A580 five times the memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W and requires a 450 W suggested power supply with 2x 8-pin connectors. The Jetson Orin Nano Super has a TDP of 25 W, requiring no external power connectors. This places the Jetson module at roughly one-seventh the power draw of the Arc A580.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Arc A580 has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Jetson Orin Nano Super has 1024 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Arc A580 provides three times the shading units and six times the ROPs.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Arc A580 additionally includes 24 ray tracing cores, while the Jetson Orin Nano Super includes 32 tensor cores and no ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The Arc A580 is a dual-slot discrete card. The Jetson Orin Nano Super is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) measuring 70 mm by 45 mm, making it suitable for portable devices.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc A580 uses the DG2-512 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 series. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super uses the GA10B chip based on the Ampere architecture, part of the Tegra generation. It is fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung with a 200 mm² die size. Transistor count is listed as unknown in the database, and transistor density data is not recorded.

The compute feature sets differ in notable ways. The Arc A580 includes 24 ray tracing cores, which the Jetson Orin Nano Super lacks entirely. Conversely, the Jetson Orin Nano Super includes 32 tensor cores, while the Arc A580 has no tensor cores recorded. This reflects their intended workloads: the Arc A580 targets gaming and graphics rendering, while the Jetson module is designed for AI and edge inference tasks.

The Arc A580's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The Jetson Orin Nano Super delivers 16.32 GPixel/s and 32.64 GTexel/s. These figures show the Arc A580 outpacing the Jetson module by approximately 11.8 times in pixel throughput and 11.8 times in texture throughput.

Specification Differences

The two products diverge across nearly every recorded specification. The manufacturing process differs: 6 nm at TSMC for the Arc A580 versus 8 nm at Samsung for the Jetson Orin Nano Super. Die size differs at 406 mm² versus 200 mm². Transistor count is 21,700 million for the Arc A580, while the Jetson module's count is unknown.

Clock speeds show the Arc A580 running at 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost. The Jetson Orin Nano Super has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks differ as well: the Arc A580 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate, while the Jetson module runs at 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective.

Memory bandwidth is 512.0 GB/s for the Arc A580 versus 102.4 GB/s for the Jetson Orin Nano Super. The memory bus width is 256-bit for the Arc A580 and 128-bit for the Jetson module. Both use different memory types: GDDR6 for the Arc A580 and LPDDR5 for the Jetson module.

The Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W with a dual-slot form factor and 2x 8-pin power connectors. The Jetson Orin Nano Super has a TDP of 25 W, an IGP form factor, and no power connectors. The suggested PSU is 450 W for the Arc A580, while the Jetson module has no PSU requirement listed.

Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Arc A580 versus PCIe 4.0 x4 for the Jetson Orin Nano Super. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 for the Arc A580, while the Jetson module's outputs are described as portable device dependent. The Jetson Orin Nano Super measures 70 mm by 45 mm, while the Arc A580's dimensions are not recorded.

Release dates differ by over a year. The Arc A580 launched on October 9, 2023, while the Jetson Orin Nano Super launched on December 16, 2024. The Arc A580 has a predecessor in Xe Graphics and a successor in Battlemage. The Jetson Orin Nano Super has no predecessor or successor listed.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear separation of use cases. The Intel Arc A580 is a high-performance desktop graphics card with 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It is positioned for traditional graphics workloads, supporting ray tracing and delivering strong benchmark results in the 87th percentile.

The NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super is a low-power embedded module with 2.089 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 8 GB of LPDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, and 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 25 W TDP and compact 70 mm by 45 mm footprint make it suitable for portable and edge deployments. Its 32 tensor cores indicate a focus on AI inference workloads.

The Arc A580's nearest rivals all sit within 1.1% of its average benchmark score of 57756, showing that it competes effectively with cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and RX 9070 GRE. No such competitive context exists for the Jetson Orin Nano Super, as its benchmark field is empty.

The choice between these two products depends entirely on the deployment scenario. The Arc A580 delivers roughly 5.9 times the FP32 performance of the Jetson module, along with ray tracing support and higher memory bandwidth. The Jetson Orin Nano Super delivers extreme power efficiency, a compact footprint, and tensor core support for AI workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A580 wins in every category of raw graphics performance. Its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 output, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate position it for demanding gaming and rendering tasks. Its 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The 24 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature absent from the Jetson module. Its three recorded benchmark scores, including an 87th percentile ranking, confirm its competitive standing among desktop GPUs.

The NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super wins in power efficiency and form factor. Its 25 W TDP is approximately one-seventh of the Arc A580's 175 W TDP. Its 70 mm by 45 mm dimensions and IGP form factor allow integration into portable devices where a dual-slot discrete card cannot fit. Its 32 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for AI and machine learning inference, which the Arc A580 lacks entirely. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface suits embedded system integration, while the Arc A580's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface targets full desktop motherboards.

The launch MSRP of the Jetson Orin Nano Super is 249 USD, while the Arc A580 has no recorded launch MSRP. The production status for both is listed as active, meaning both remain available. The Arc A580's successor, Battlemage, indicates an ongoing product line, while the Jetson Orin Nano Super has no successor listed, suggesting it may be a standalone offering in the embedded market.