GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

CORE STATE GP107S
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1468 MHz
TDP 20 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Pascal
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

H200 NVL

CORE STATE GH100
VRAM 141 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1785 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 6144 bit
ARCHITECTURE Hopper
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
8,689
334,891
geekbench_vulkan
13,077
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA H200 NVL

Rendering performance benchmarks between NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (NVIDIA) reveal a clear leader. NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics delivers considerably stronger performance over modern gaming benchmarks. This memory advantage and architectural improvements translate into visibly enhanced gaming results. Performance figures supports this observation. Users demanding maximum visuals would take note.

The VRAM benefit of NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics gets particularly relevant at demanding detail settings. Demanding workloads consumes notable VRAM, and NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics offers more capacity. The results into smoother performance in VRAM-hungry workloads. Future releases might increasingly need extra graphics memory. This edge grows over releases.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics pulls further ahead of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (NVIDIA). Its hardware cores handle intensive shadow calculations considerably more efficiently. Players seeking modern effects might definitely consider NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics. This real-time ray tracing capability is substantial. Modern games continually take advantage of real-time ray tracing effects.

In conclusion, NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics delivers the better choice in this evaluation. Its performance superiority validate attention for anyone building a capable graphics PC. Though NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (NVIDIA) features its merits, this performance figures definitely benefits NVIDIA's NVIDIA H200 NVL graphics. Base your decision with this in mind. The frame rate difference is notable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
MX350
H200 NVL
Core Specs
Shading Units
640
16,896 +2540.0%
Shaders
640
16,896 +2540.0%
TMUs
32
528 +1550.0%
ROPs
16
24 +50.0%
SM Count
5
132 +2540.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1354 MHz
1365 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1785 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz 7 Gbps effective
1593 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
2 GB
141 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
144,384 +6950.0%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM3e
Memory Bus
64 bit
6144 bit
Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
4.89 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
512 KB
50 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
23.49 GPixel/s
42.84 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
46.98 GTexel/s
942.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1.879 TFLOPS
60.32 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
30.16 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
120.6 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
Tensor Cores
528
Power
TDP
20 W
600 W
TDP (W)
20
600 +2900.0%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Power Connectors
None
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Pascal
Hopper
GPU Name
GP107S
GH100
Generation
GeForce MX (3xx)
Server Hopper (Hxx)
Process Size
14 nm
5 nm
Transistors
3,300 million
80,000 million
Die Size
132 mm²
814 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
25.0M / mm²
98.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
6.1
9.0
Shader Model
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Server Ada
Successor
Server Blackwell
View GeForce MX350 Details View H200 NVL Details