GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 750

CORE STATE Rocket Lake

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 14 nm+++

LAUNCH DATE 2021

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 32 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz

TDP 575 W

BUS WIDTH 512 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

6,743

334,370

geekbench_vulkan

8,138

376,728

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

18,355

passmark_directx_10

N/A

226

passmark_directx_11

N/A

341

passmark_directx_12

N/A

185

passmark_directx_9

N/A

395

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,413

passmark_g3d

N/A

39,650

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

26,756

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

During this graphics card showdown, RTX 5090 establishes its dominance clearly. Whether you're creating content at 1440p, RTX 5090 reliably exceeds Intel UHD Graphics 750 by notable margins. This performance difference expands especially greater at higher resolutions. The video card handles demanding workloads with grace. The design advantages are obvious.

For ray tracing, RTX 5090 jumps significantly in front of Intel UHD Graphics 750. The dedicated units execute heavy reflection effects significantly more smoothly. Gamers seeking next-gen effects should strongly favor RTX 5090. The RT superiority is significant. Current releases more and more use hardware RT effects.

All things considered, RTX 5090 provides the better selection in this comparison. The frame rate edges validate evaluation for those building a powerful rendering system. Though Intel UHD Graphics 750 features its positives, this score results obviously advantages RTX 5090. Base your choice with this in mind. This gaming delta is substantial enough to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

UHD Graphics 750

RTX 5090

Core Specs

Shading Units

256

21,760 +8400.0%

Shaders

256

21,760 +8400.0%

TMUs

680 +4150.0%

ROPs

176 +2100.0%

SM Count

—

170

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

300 MHz

2017 MHz

Boost Clock

1300 MHz

2407 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

32 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

32,768

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR7

Memory Bus

System Shared

512 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

1.79 TB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

—

96 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

10.40 GPixel/s

423.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

20.80 GTexel/s

1,636.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

665.6 GFLOPS

104.8 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

—

1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)

104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

170

Tensor Cores

—

680

Power

TDP

15 W

575 W

TDP (W)

575 +3733.3%

Suggested PSU

—

950 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Generation 12.1

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

Rocket Lake

GB202

Generation

HD Graphics (Rocket Lake)

GeForce 50

Process Size

14 nm+++

5 nm

Transistors

—

92,200 million

Die Size

—

750 mm²

Foundry

Intel

TSMC

Density

—

122.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.6

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

304 mm 12 inches

Height

—

137 mm 5.4 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,999 USD

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

—

GeForce 40

Successor

—

GeForce 60

View UHD Graphics 750 Details View GeForce RTX 5090 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel UHD Graphics 750

GeForce RTX 5090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons