GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1515 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,612
5,871
geekbench_opencl
98,554
201,834
geekbench_vulkan
85,631
198,405
passmark_directx_10
65
183
passmark_directx_11
72
269
passmark_directx_12
70
138
passmark_directx_9
181
324
passmark_g2d
732
1,057
passmark_g3d
12,534
30,034
passmark_gpu_compute
5,368
13,401

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

For this graphics card matchup, the NVIDIA RTX 5090 demonstrates its superiority clearly. If you're gaming at 1440p, the NVIDIA RTX 5090 consistently exceeds Arc A750 (Intel) by substantial margins. This speed gap grows notably greater at demanding quality levels. This graphics card manages intensive titles with efficiency. The technical improvements are obvious.

Gaming results over diverse resolutions consistently favor the NVIDIA RTX 5090. Whether it's competitive genres to blockbuster productions, the NVIDIA RTX 5090 preserves its lead. The gaming consistency in multiple scenarios demonstrates underlying technical improvements. Players will rely on solid results independent of genre. The adaptability is impressive.

Arc A750 (Intel) faces challenges to match the NVIDIA RTX 5090's sheer power. In value-focused consumers, Arc A750 (Intel) could nonetheless represent acceptable frame rates, yet users demanding the best experience should invest toward the NVIDIA RTX 5090. This gaming gap is too notable to overlook. Intensive workloads particularly reveal this disparity. This cost difference delivers rewards in performance.

At the end of the day: the NVIDIA RTX 5090 claims this matchup decisively. Users valuing visual throughput will definitely consider the NVIDIA RTX 5090 over Arc A750 (Intel). The benchmark numbers confirms this verdict. The scenarios can render substantially more fluidly. This is a clear choice in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A750
RTX 5090 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,584
10,496 +192.9%
Shaders
3,584
10,496 +192.9%
TMUs
224
328 +46.4%
ROPs
112
112 0.0%
SM Count
82
Execution Units
448
Clocks
Base Clock
2050 MHz
990 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1515 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
24,576 +200.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
169.7 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
496.9 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
17.20 TFLOPS
31.80 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)
496.9 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
31.80 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
82 +192.9%
Tensor Cores
328
XMX Cores
448
Power
TDP
225 W
95 W
TDP (W)
225
95 -57.8%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
DG2-512
GB203
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 7)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
21,700 million
45,600 million
Die Size
406 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
53.4M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
289 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
Battlemage
View Arc A750 Details View GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Details