NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RTX 5080 has a full set of ten individual benchmark scores, while the LX PRO has no recorded benchmark entries, meaning its average benchmark score sits at 0. The RTX 5080 carries an average benchmark score of 56,083 across all tested workloads, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX PRO holds a 50th percentile position, which reflects its lack of measured data rather than any demonstrated performance.

Looking at the RTX 5080’s individual results, the strongest showing comes from Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 255,450, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 235,901. In Passmark testing, the G3D score reaches 36,565, while GPU Compute scores 21,789. The DirectX 9 result is 389, DirectX 11 is 324, and DirectX 10 is 208. The DirectX 12 score is 151. The 2D graphics score is 1,415. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns 8,637. These numbers establish a consistent performance profile for the RTX 5080, but without any LX PRO scores, no delta percentages or win counts can be calculated. The database shows zero wins for either card in a head-to-head sense.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5080 provide context for its standing. The AMD Radeon 8060S averages 55,757, which is 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB averages 55,698, also 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X averages 54,828, which is 2.3% lower. On the other side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE averages 57,367, putting it 2.2% ahead of the RTX 5080. These figures show the RTX 5080 sits within a tight cluster of competing GPUs, slightly above three of them and slightly below one, but all within a range of roughly 4.5 percentage points total.

The LX PRO has no nearest rivals listed in the database, no average score, and no individual benchmarks. Any quantitative comparison between the two cards is therefore impossible from the recorded data. What can be stated is that the RTX 5080 delivers measured results across a broad set of API workloads, while the LX PRO remains unmeasured in every recorded test.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge sharply at the silicon level. The RTX 5080 uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on a TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 6 nm node. The RTX 5080 packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX PRO’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no density figure recorded.

Shading unit counts differ substantially. The RTX 5080 has 10,752 shading units, while the LX PRO has 6,144. Texture mapping units number 336 against 192, and raster output units stand at 112 versus 96. The RTX 5080 includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists neither ray tracing nor tensor core counts, leaving those fields null. The RTX 5080’s FP32 throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS, more than double the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16, the RTX 5080 delivers 56.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 work is achieved through rate doubling rather than native throughput.

Clock behavior also differs. The RTX 5080 has base and boost clocks of 2295 MHz and 2617 MHz respectively, while the LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks favor the RTX 5080 at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective, versus the LX PRO’s 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The higher effective data rate on the RTX 5080 compensates for its lower memory clock because of the different memory technology.

Memory architecture splits the two clearly. The RTX 5080 uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. That is a 528 GB/s gap in favor of the RTX 5080, despite the LX PRO having 8 GB more capacity. Pixel rates are 293.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 5080 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rates are 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Process node differences matter for density and efficiency, though the LX PRO’s unknown transistor count prevents direct density comparison. The 5 nm node on the RTX 5080 is one step ahead of the 6 nm node on the LX PRO, which typically allows tighter packing and lower power per transistor. Power draw reflects this: the RTX 5080 has a 360 W TDP, while the LX PRO is rated at 225 W.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7. The LX PRO carries 8 GB more capacity.

Q: Which card delivers higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 delivers 960.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, compared to the LX PRO’s 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. The RTX 5080 provides more than double the bandwidth.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference?

A: The RTX 5080 achieves 56.28 TFLOPS in FP32, while the LX PRO achieves 24.58 TFLOPS. The RTX 5080 is roughly 2.3 times faster in single-precision compute.

Q: Does the LX PRO support ray tracing or tensor operations?

A: The database lists no ray tracing core count and no tensor core count for the LX PRO. The RTX 5080 has 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The RTX 5080 has a 360 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 750 W. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5080 ranks in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 56,083. The LX PRO ranks in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0 due to no recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RTX 5080 uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The RTX 5080 has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die; the LX PRO has unknown transistor count and die size.

Shading units: 10,752 on the RTX 5080, 6,144 on the LX PRO. TMUs: 336 versus 192. ROPs: 112 versus 96. RT cores: 84 versus none listed. Tensor cores: 336 versus none listed. FP32: 56.28 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate: 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock: 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. TDP: 360 W versus 225 W. Suggested PSU: 750 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions: 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width versus 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width. The RTX 5080 is longer and taller but thinner; the LX PRO is shorter and lower but wider.

API support: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5080 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5080 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded. The RTX 5080 released on 2025-01-29, while the LX PRO released on 2026-03-16. Both cards are dual-slot with a single 16-pin power connector. Both have active production status.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 wins outright on compute performance. Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS more than doubles the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS. That advantage carries into texture and pixel processing: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. For workloads that hammer raw shader throughput, such as heavy tessellation, compute shaders, or high-resolution rasterization with many overdraw layers, the RTX 5080 has a clear edge.

Memory bandwidth also favors the RTX 5080 decisively. At 960.0 GB/s, it provides over twice the LX PRO’s 432.0 GB/s. Games and applications that stream large textures, run high-resolution shadow maps, or use compute-based post-processing will benefit from that bandwidth headroom. The RTX 5080’s GDDR7 memory operates at 30 Gbps effective, versus 18 Gbps effective on the LX PRO, reinforcing the bandwidth lead.

Ray tracing is a non-comparison based on the data. The RTX 5080 has 84 dedicated RT cores, while the LX PRO has no RT core count listed. Any ray traced workload, whether reflections, global illumination, or path tracing, relies on those dedicated units. The LX PRO would have to fall back on general shader execution for ray tracing, which is far less efficient. Tensor cores on the RTX 5080, numbering 336, further separate the cards for AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling or neural network inference. The LX PRO has no tensor core count recorded.

The LX PRO wins on memory capacity. Its 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer exceeds the RTX 5080’s 16 GB by 8 GB. For workloads that require large datasets resident in VRAM, such as training large machine learning models, rendering high-resolution textures for film production, or running virtual machines with GPU passthrough, the extra capacity matters more than raw speed. The LX PRO also wins on power draw and physical footprint. Its 225 W TDP is 135 W lower than the RTX 5080’s 360 W, and its suggested PSU of 550 W is 200 W lower. Its dimensions are smaller in length and height: 248 mm versus 304 mm, and 118 mm versus 137 mm. It is wider at 48 mm versus 40 mm, but overall it fits in tighter spaces.

The LX PRO also offers more display outputs with four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, compared to the RTX 5080’s one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b. For multi-monitor setups requiring more than three DisplayPort connections, the LX PRO has an advantage. The RTX 5080’s DisplayPort 2.1b supports higher bandwidth, but the LX PRO provides more physical ports.

The Verdict

The data presents a lopsided comparison. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has measured benchmark results across ten workloads and an average score of 56,083, placing it in the 87th percentile. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores at all, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. For any buyer prioritizing proven performance, the RTX 5080 is the only card with verifiable results.

The RTX 5080 leads in every compute metric: FP32 at 56.28 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, texture rate at 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, pixel rate at 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and bandwidth at 960.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. It has dedicated RT cores and tensor cores where the LX PRO has none recorded. It uses a newer 5 nm process versus 6 nm, newer GDDR7 memory versus GDDR6, and a faster PCIe 5.0 interface versus PCIe 4.0. Its launch MSRP is 999 USD, though no price comparison is possible since the LX PRO has no recorded launch MSRP.

The LX PRO appeals only in specific niches. Its 24 GB of VRAM exceeds the RTX 5080 by 8 GB, which matters for memory-bound workloads. Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU make it far easier to integrate into power-constrained systems. Its shorter and lower physical dimensions, 248 mm by 118 mm versus 304 mm by 137 mm, allow installation in smaller cases. Four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs beat the RTX 5080’s three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs in port count, though not in per-port bandwidth.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The RTX 5080 is a fully characterized, high-performance GPU with substantial leads in compute, bandwidth, and feature support. The LX PRO is an unmeasured product with no benchmark evidence of any kind. Buyers who need proven gaming or professional rendering performance should choose the RTX 5080. Buyers who need maximum VRAM capacity at lower power draw, and who are willing to accept an unverified product, can consider the LX PRO. But the absence of any recorded benchmark data for the LX PRO means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from this database.