NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win counters for both products are zero. This means the database holds no comparative frame-by-frame scores, no per-test deltas, and no aggregated matchup statistics for these two devices.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile does have a full benchmark profile in the database. Its individual scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 4952, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 166986, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 169754, and a Passmark G3D score of 27711. The Passmark suite also records a DirectX 10 score of 171, DirectX 11 score of 253, DirectX 12 score of 116, DirectX 9 score of 314, G2D score of 1095, and GPU compute score of 12134. The average benchmark score across all tests for the RTX 5080 Mobile is 38349. Its percentile standing among all GPUs is 81.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an empty benchmark array. There are no recorded scores for any test, no average benchmark score (listed as 0), and no nearest rivals. Its percentile standing among all GPUs is 50, but this figure is not derived from any actual measured performance data in the pack. The LX PRO appears in the database with a performance classification, but the underlying measurements that would normally support such a classification are absent.

Since the head-to-head comparison field has no entries, the analysis must rely on the individual benchmark records for the RTX 5080 Mobile and the architectural specifications for both products. The data shows that the RTX 5080 Mobile has a measured presence in the database, while the LX PRO does not. The nearest rivals for the RTX 5080 Mobile are the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with an average score of 38299 and a delta of 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile with an average score of 38135 and a delta of 0.6%, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A with an average score of 38691 and a delta of -0.9%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X with an average score of 38706 and a delta of -0.9%. These deltas place the RTX 5080 Mobile within roughly one percent of all four rivals, indicating that its measured average score sits in a very tight cluster.

The absence of LX PRO benchmarks means no direct wins can be assigned to either side. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. The only quantitative comparison possible is between the RTX 5080 Mobile's measured average score of 38349 and the LX PRO's unmeasured placeholder of 0, but that placeholder does not represent a real benchmark result. The database simply lacks the data to declare a winner in any specific test.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5080 Mobile uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 378 mm² with a transistor count of 45,600 million, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no transistor density recorded.

The RTX 5080 Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50-series and the GeForce 50 Mobile generation, with the GeForce 40 Mobile as its predecessor. The LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation, with no predecessor listed. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a base clock of 975 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 5080 Mobile runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystems diverge significantly. The RTX 5080 Mobile carries 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO carries 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5080 Mobile has more than double the memory bandwidth, while the LX PRO has 50% more memory capacity.

The compute resources also differ. The RTX 5080 Mobile has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The pixel rate for the RTX 5080 Mobile is 144.0 GPixel/s, while the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s. The texture rate for the RTX 5080 Mobile is 360.0 GTexel/s, while the LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s. The floating point performance shows the RTX 5080 Mobile at 23.04 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), while the LX PRO reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Power and physical design are major differentiators. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a TDP of 80 W, an integrated graphics processor form factor, and no power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot form factor, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 550 W. The RTX 5080 Mobile uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5080 Mobile's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX PRO has physical dimensions recorded at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, while the RTX 5080 Mobile has no dimensions recorded.

API support shows both products supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5080 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The production status for both is active. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a release date of 2025-04-01, and the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. Neither product has a launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual situation. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a complete set of benchmark measurements, a percentile rank of 81, and an average benchmark score of 38349. The LX PRO has no benchmark measurements at all, a percentile rank of 50, and an average benchmark score of 0. The database cannot confirm the LX PRO's actual performance because no tests were recorded. The percentile rank of 50 for the LX PRO appears without supporting data, while the RTX 5080 Mobile's rank of 81 is backed by ten distinct test scores.

From the architectural data, the RTX 5080 Mobile is the only one with ray tracing cores and tensor cores. It also has a much higher memory bandwidth at 896.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a newer PCIe interface (5.0 versus 4.0), a smaller process node (5 nm versus 6 nm), and a substantially lower TDP at 80 W versus 225 W. The LX PRO counters with more memory capacity (24 GB versus 16 GB), higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 144.0 GPixel/s), higher texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 360.0 GTexel/s), higher FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 23.04 TFLOPS), and much higher FP16 throughput (49.15 TFLOPS versus 23.04 TFLOPS). The LX PRO also has a higher memory clock of 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz, but the effective data rate is lower at 18 Gbps versus 28 Gbps.

The RTX 5080 Mobile is the only device with measured performance in the database. Its average score of 38349 places it within 0.6% of the RTX 4080 Mobile and within 0.1% of the MX570, two very different products in the broader market. The LX PRO, without any recorded benchmarks, cannot be positioned relative to the RTX 5080 Mobile in actual workload performance. The data supports picking the RTX 5080 Mobile for any scenario requiring validated, measured performance, ray tracing, tensor operations, or high memory bandwidth. The LX PRO's advantages are purely on paper: larger memory pool, higher raw throughput in FP32 and FP16, higher pixel and texture rates, and a dual-slot desktop-style form factor with dedicated display outputs. The absence of benchmark data means the LX PRO's real-world behavior remains unverified.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The process node differs: 5 nm for the RTX 5080 Mobile, 6 nm for the LX PRO. The chip names differ: GB203 versus 7G105. The architectures differ: Blackwell 2.0 versus TrueGPU. The generations differ: GeForce 50 Mobile versus 7G100.

Memory specifications diverge completely. The RTX 5080 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5080 Mobile and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO.

Compute unit counts differ: 7680 shading units versus 6144, 240 TMUs versus 192, and identical 96 ROPs. The RTX 5080 Mobile has 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores; the LX PRO has none listed. Pixel rates are 144.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 360.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 23.04 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications differ sharply. TDP is 80 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU is not listed for the RTX 5080 Mobile, while the LX PRO lists 550 W. Bus interfaces are PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX PRO has dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm; the RTX 5080 Mobile has none recorded.

Vulkan support differs: 1.4 for the RTX 5080 Mobile, 1.3 for the LX PRO. DirectX and OpenGL support match at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6. The transistor count, die size, and transistor density are recorded for the RTX 5080 Mobile (45,600 million, 378 mm², 120.6M per mm²) but are unknown or null for the LX PRO. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a base and boost clock; the LX PRO has neither. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a predecessor (GeForce 40 Mobile); the LX PRO has none. Release dates differ: 2025-04-01 versus 2026-03-16.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the LX PRO is empty, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile?

A: The average benchmark score for the RTX 5080 Mobile is 38349, based on ten recorded tests including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has higher memory bandwidth at 896.0 GB/s, compared to the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has 60 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has a TDP of 80 W, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 5080 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 Mobile wins in every category backed by measured data. Its average benchmark score of 38349 is the only verified performance figure between the two products. Its percentile rank of 81 versus the LX PRO's 50 suggests a much stronger standing among all GPUs, though the LX PRO's rank lacks supporting benchmark evidence. The RTX 5080 Mobile also wins on memory bandwidth at 896.0 GB/s, which directly benefits high-resolution texturing, large framebuffer operations, and bandwidth-sensitive workloads. It has 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores, making it the only option for ray-traced rendering and tensor-accelerated workloads such as AI inference or DLSS-style processing. Its 5 nm process node and 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die indicate a denser, more modern design. Its 80 W TDP and integrated form factor make it suitable for portable devices, as reflected in its display output listing as portable device dependent. The RTX 5080 Mobile also supports Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3, and PCIe 5.0 versus PCIe 4.0.

The LX PRO wins on several specification-driven metrics that favor raw throughput and capacity. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory is 50% larger than the RTX 5080 Mobile's 16 GB, which matters for very large datasets, high-resolution textures, or multi-application GPU memory usage. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5080 Mobile's 23.04 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than double the RTX 5080 Mobile's 23.04 TFLOPS, indicating a strong capability for half-precision compute workloads. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s both exceed the RTX 5080 Mobile's 144.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s, suggesting faster fill-rate-bound rendering in certain scenarios. Its 2250 MHz memory clock is higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile's 1750 MHz, though the effective data rate is lower at 18 Gbps versus 28 Gbps. The LX PRO has a dual-slot desktop form factor with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and a 248 mm length, making it a discrete add-in card rather than an integrated mobile solution. Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate it is designed for desktop systems with dedicated power delivery.

The data shows a clear split: the RTX 5080 Mobile wins on measured performance, bandwidth, feature set, and efficiency, while the LX PRO wins on memory capacity, raw throughput in FP32 and FP16, fill rates, and desktop-oriented physical design. Without any recorded benchmarks for the LX PRO, the RTX 5080 Mobile remains the only product whose real-world performance is confirmed by the database.