NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 compare to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO in overall benchmark position?

A: The RTX 5070 holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40377. The LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, as it has no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What are the closest performance rivals to the RTX 5070 according to the database?

A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with an average score of 40318 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40063 (0.8% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40870 (1.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at 39568 (2% behind).

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is double the 12 GB of GDDR7 found on the RTX 5070.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each card deliver?

A: The RTX 5070 provides 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth with 192-bit bus and 28 Gbps effective memory clock. The LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s with the same 192-bit bus but a slower 18 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: How do the compute capabilities differ between the two?

A: The RTX 5070 delivers 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 and 30.87 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), meaning it has higher half-precision throughput but lower single-precision.

Q: Are both cards currently in production?

A: Yes, both the RTX 5070 and the LX PRO have an active production status in the database.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The RTX 5070 packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The two GPUs share the same shading unit count at 6144 and the same texture mapping unit count at 192. However, the ROP count differs: the RTX 5070 has 80 ROPs, while the LX PRO has 96 ROPs. The RTX 5070 includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, while the LX PRO has no recorded entries for either core type.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The RTX 5070 has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 5070 runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The API support shows some divergence. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5070 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Physical characteristics differ minimally in length but more in thickness. The RTX 5070 measures 245 mm long, 115 mm high, and 40 mm wide. The LX PRO measures 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 wins decisively in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS by a significant margin. The texture rate also favors NVIDIA: 482.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. Pixel rate is nearly identical, with the RTX 5070 at 201.0 GPixel/s and the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s.

The RTX 5070 also wins on memory bandwidth. Its 672.0 GB/s is 55.6% higher than the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s, despite both using a 192-bit bus. The faster GDDR7 memory on the RTX 5070 enables this advantage.

The LX PRO wins on memory capacity. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 is twice the RTX 5070's 12 GB. This could matter for workloads that require large datasets resident in VRAM, such as certain AI inference tasks or large 3D scene rendering.

The LX PRO also wins on half-precision compute. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) is substantially higher than the RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). For workloads that leverage FP16 heavily, the LX PRO has an advantage.

The LX PRO draws less power at 225 W TDP versus 250 W for the RTX 5070. It also recommends a 550 W PSU versus 600 W.

The LX PRO offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 5070 provides one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX 5070 supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two GPUs differ:

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Chip | GB205 | 7G105 |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2325 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 48 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 192 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 482.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 30.87 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2025-03-03 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | null |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 5070 and the LX PRO. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores across any test, and its average benchmark score is 0.

For the RTX 5070, the recorded data shows a range of results across several tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5077. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 172660, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 178923. Passmark tests show 180 in DirectX 10, 277 in DirectX 11, 108 in DirectX 12, 320 in DirectX 9, 1305 in G2D, 29137 in G3D, and 15787 in GPU Compute.

The nearest rival comparisons for the RTX 5070 provide context for its standing. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 is essentially tied at 0.1% difference, with an average score of 40318 versus the RTX 5070's 40377. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 trails by 0.8% with an average score of 40063. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 leads by 1.2% with an average score of 40870. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile trails by 2% with an average score of 39568.

The RTX 5070's percentile rank of 82 places it well above the midpoint of all GPUs tracked in the database. The LX PRO's percentile rank of 50 with no benchmark data suggests it sits at the median position but lacks measured performance confirmation.

Given the absence of LX PRO benchmark results, the performance comparison must rely on theoretical specifications rather than measured outcomes. The RTX 5070's FP32 throughput advantage of 25.6% over the LX PRO's FP32 figure indicates a clear lead in single-precision workloads. The texture rate advantage of 25.6% similarly favors the RTX 5070.

The LX PRO's FP16 throughput advantage of 59.2% over the RTX 5070 suggests it could outperform in half-precision workloads if the architecture scales accordingly. The memory capacity advantage of 100% could also provide practical benefits for certain workloads.

The RTX 5070's bandwidth advantage of 55.6% over the LX PRO indicates faster data movement for memory-intensive tasks, though the larger VRAM pool on the LX PRO could compensate in scenarios where capacity matters more than speed.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split between these two GPUs based on workload characteristics. The RTX 5070 is the stronger choice for general compute and gaming-oriented tasks. Its FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS, texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s, and memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s all exceed the LX PRO's corresponding figures by margins of 25.6% or more. The 82nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 40377 confirm solid measured performance.

The LX PRO targets a different profile. Its 24 GB memory capacity doubles the RTX 5070's 12 GB, and its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 59.2% higher. These specifications suggest suitability for workloads that need large VRAM pools or that rely heavily on half-precision math. The 6 nm process node, 225 W TDP, and 550 W PSU recommendation also indicate lower power draw.

The RTX 5070 includes ray tracing cores and tensor cores, while the LX PRO has no recorded entries for these features. For applications that leverage those specialized units, the RTX 5070 has a structural advantage. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface on the RTX 5070 also provides double the bandwidth of the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16.

The LX PRO lacks benchmark data entirely, meaning its real-world performance cannot be verified against the RTX 5070 or any other GPU in the database. The theoretical specifications suggest it competes in specific niches, but without measurements, those claims remain unconfirmed.

The RTX 5070 benefits from a well-documented performance profile with multiple benchmark scores and clear rival comparisons. Its nearest rivals are all within 2% of its average score, indicating a tightly contested performance band. The LX PRO's lack of any recorded scores places it in an unverified position.

For users prioritizing single-precision compute, texture throughput, memory bandwidth, or ray tracing and tensor core functionality, the RTX 5070 is the data-supported choice. For users needing 24 GB of VRAM or maximum FP16 throughput, the LX PRO presents a specification-based alternative, though its actual performance remains unmeasured. The RTX 5070 also has a listed launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the LX PRO has no recorded launch price.