NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The data paints a remarkably one-sided picture. Across all ten recorded benchmark comparisons, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti takes the win. The RTX 5070 does not register a single victory in any of the tested workloads. That does not mean the smaller card is without purpose, but its role is clearly defined by a different set of priorities.

The RTX 5070 Ti dominates in compute-heavy and modern graphics workloads. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 6604 against 5077 for the RTX 5070, a 30.1% advantage. That is the single largest delta in the entire comparison. GPU compute results reinforce the pattern: PassMark GPU Compute shows the 5070 Ti at 20203 versus 15787, a 28% gap. This suggests the 5070 Ti is the better choice for tasks that hammer the shader array and tensor cores, such as rendering, simulation, or any workflow where raw FP32 throughput matters.

The RTX 5070, by contrast, wins in a different sense: it occupies a more efficient position in the lineup. With a 250 W TDP against 300 W for the Ti, and a shorter 245 mm length versus 304 mm, it fits into more constrained builds. The data shows it still delivers respectable performance, just at a lower absolute level. Its strongest relative showing is in 2D workloads, where the gap narrows to 2.1% (1332 versus 1305 in PassMark G2D). That is the closest margin anywhere in the dataset.

For legacy DirectX titles, the 5070 Ti leads but by smaller margins. PassMark DirectX 9 shows 351 versus 320, a 9.7% difference. DirectX 10 is closer still at 6.7% (192 versus 180). These older APIs do not scale as aggressively with the additional hardware resources, so the gap compresses. Modern APIs tell a different story, with DirectX 12 showing a 17.6% lead for the 5070 Ti (127 versus 108) and Vulkan showing 25.8% (225122 versus 178923).

The pattern is clear: the 5070 Ti is built for maximum throughput, while the 5070 is built for balance. The database places the 5070 Ti at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, versus the 82nd percentile for the 5070. That four-point spread reflects the average benchmark score gap of 49957 versus 40377, a 23.7% difference in overall measured performance.

Architecture Differences

Both cards share the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the 5 nm TSMC process node, but they are fundamentally different chips. The 5070 Ti uses the GB203 die with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The 5070 uses the GB205 die with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The transistor density is nearly identical, 120.6M per mm² versus 118.3M per mm², which indicates the process maturity is the same, but the physical scale is not.

The core configuration diverges sharply. The 5070 Ti packs 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The 5070 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. That is a 45.8% advantage in shading units for the Ti, which explains its commanding lead in FP32 throughput: 43.94 TFLOPS versus 30.87 TFLOPS. The FP16 figures match the FP32 rates at a 1:1 ratio, so both cards process half-precision at the same rate as single-precision, a design choice that favors compute workloads.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware scale similarly. The 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores against 48 on the 5070, and 280 tensor cores versus 192. These are not just count differences; they represent proportional increases in the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The pixel rate tells the same story: 235.4 GPixel/s for the Ti versus 201.0 GPixel/s for the 5070. Texture rate shows a larger gap, 686.6 GTexel/s versus 482.3 GTexel/s, a 42.4% advantage.

Clock speeds behave inversely. The 5070 runs higher clocks, with a base of 2325 MHz and a boost of 2512 MHz. The 5070 Ti sits slightly lower at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. This is a familiar pattern: the smaller chip with fewer cores can push higher frequencies, but it cannot compensate for the core deficit. The memory clock is identical at 1750 MHz, running 28 Gbps effective on both.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 5070 has 12 GB on a 192-bit bus, yielding 672.0 GB/s. That is a 33.3% bandwidth advantage for the Ti, which becomes critical in high-resolution textures and large scene loads. The 4 GB capacity difference also matters for modern games that exceed 12 GB at high settings.

Physical dimensions reflect the internal disparity. The 5070 Ti measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm, while the 5070 comes in at 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector, but the Ti requires a 700 W suggested PSU versus 600 W for the 5070. Display outputs are identical: one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b. API support is also the same, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a straightforward conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti is the faster card in every measured category, and it wins all ten head-to-head comparisons. The average benchmark score of 49957 places it 23.7% ahead of the 5070's 40377. Its nearest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which scores 50001, just 0.1% higher. That means the 5070 Ti sits in a competitive band where small deviations matter, and it is effectively tied with a previous-generation high-end card.

For users who prioritize raw performance, particularly in compute, Vulkan, or modern DirectX 12 workloads, the 5070 Ti is the clear selection. Its 30.1% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 28% lead in GPU compute are decisive. The additional 4 GB of memory and 224 GB/s of extra bandwidth provide headroom for future workloads that demand larger data sets.

The RTX 5070 makes sense for a different user profile. It is smaller, lighter, and draws less power, with a 250 W TDP versus 300 W. It still delivers strong scores, sitting at the 82nd percentile and beating its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, by 0.1%. Its performance in 2D tasks is nearly identical to the Ti, and its legacy DirectX 9 and 10 results are within 10%. For users who do not need maximum compute throughput or who have physical or power constraints, the 5070 remains a capable option, but the data does not show any workload where it surpasses the Ti.

The verdict is not close. The 5070 Ti wins on every metric recorded, and the only real question is whether the 5070's lower power draw and smaller footprint justify the performance sacrifice. For pure performance, the Ti is the answer. For compact builds or power-sensitive configurations, the 5070 serves a purpose, but it is strictly a compromise, not a competitor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 on average, while the RTX 5070 scores 40377, a difference of 23.7%.

Q: How much faster is the 5070 Ti in DirectX 12?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the 5070 Ti scores 6604 versus 5077 for the 5070, a 30.1% advantage. In PassMark DirectX 12, the lead is 17.6% (127 versus 108).

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the 5070 has 12 GB. The bus width differs as well, with 256-bit on the Ti versus 192-bit on the 5070.

Q: Does the 5070 have any winning benchmarks?

A: No. Across all ten recorded head-to-head comparisons, the 5070 Ti wins every single test. The closest margin is in PassMark G2D, where the Ti leads by only 2.1%.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare?

A: The 5070 runs higher clocks, with a base of 2325 MHz and a boost of 2512 MHz. The 5070 Ti runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Despite lower clocks, the Ti is faster due to its larger core count.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W, while the 5070 has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU is 700 W for the Ti and 600 W for the 5070.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest victory for the 5070 Ti comes in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 6604 against 5077, a 30.1% delta. This test is a modern, compute-heavy workload that stresses the full GPU pipeline, and the additional shading units and bandwidth pay off substantially. The second-largest gap is in GPU compute, where the Ti scores 20203 versus 15787, a 28% lead. This confirms that the architectural differences translate directly into raw number-crunching capability.

Vulkan performance shows a 25.8% gap, with scores of 225122 versus 178923. OpenCL follows at 23%, with 212363 versus 172660. These two API tests are often used for professional and scientific workloads, so the Ti's advantage matters beyond gaming. The PassMark G3D test, a general graphics score, shows 32974 versus 29137, a 13.2% lead. This is a more moderate gap, suggesting that some real-world gaming scenarios may not fully utilize the Ti's extra resources.

DirectX 12 performance in PassMark shows a 17.6% delta, with 127 versus 108. This is smaller than the 3DMark gap, likely because the PassMark test is less demanding on memory bandwidth. Legacy API tests show the smallest differences: DirectX 9 at 9.7% (351 versus 320), DirectX 11 at 8.3% (300 versus 277), and DirectX 10 at 6.7% (192 versus 180). These older APIs are often CPU-bound or lack the draw call overhead to scale with more cores.

The 2D test is the closest, with 1332 versus 1305, a 2.1% delta. This is a desktop compositing workload that barely stresses either GPU. The pattern across all tests is consistent: the wider the performance gap, the more modern or compute-oriented the workload. The 5070 Ti excels where the GPU is the bottleneck, while the 5070 holds its ground in lighter, less demanding tasks.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every core specification. The 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the 5070 uses the GB205 with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. Transistor density is similar, 120.6M per mm² against 118.3M per mm².

Shading units are 8960 versus 6144, a 45.8% difference. Texture mapping units are 280 versus 192. ROPs are 96 versus 80. RT cores are 70 versus 48. Tensor cores are 280 versus 192. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 201.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 482.3 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 throughput are 43.94 TFLOPS versus 30.87 TFLOPS.

Base clocks are 2295 MHz versus 2325 MHz. Boost clocks are 2452 MHz versus 2512 MHz. Memory is 16 GB versus 12 GB, both GDDR7. Bus width is 256-bit versus 192-bit. Bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s versus 672.0 GB/s. TDP is 300 W versus 250 W. Suggested PSU is 700 W versus 600 W. Physical dimensions are 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm against 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm. Both use a dual-slot design, a single 16-pin connector, and identical display outputs. Both support the same API set. The 5070 Ti launched on 2025-02-19, while the 5070 launched on 2025-03-03.