GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070

CORE STATE GB205

VRAM 12 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2512 MHz

TDP 250 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

5,077

geekbench_opencl

20,255

172,660

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

178,923

passmark_directx_10

180

passmark_directx_11

277

passmark_directx_12

108

passmark_directx_9

320

passmark_g2d

890

1,305

passmark_g3d

5,310

29,137

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

15,787

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Looking at the test data for the NVIDIA RTX 5070 and AMD Radeon 760M from AMD, a definite trend appears. the NVIDIA RTX 5070 steadily produces higher performance in every evaluation. This speed superiority spans from significant to impressive based on the individual game. This steadiness speaks to inherent design superiority. Consumers wanting graphics capability should consider this.

In conclusion, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 represents the stronger selection in this evaluation. The frame rate superiority justify attention for those constructing a powerful graphics system. Even though AMD Radeon 760M from AMD offers its merits, the performance data clearly advantages the NVIDIA RTX 5070. Make your choice accordingly. This gaming gap is significant enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

RTX 5070

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

6,144 +1100.0%

Shaders

512

6,144 +1100.0%

TMUs

192 +500.0%

ROPs

80 +400.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

2325 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

2512 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

12 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

12,288

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR7

Memory Bus

System Shared

192 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

672.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

48 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

201.0 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

482.3 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

30.87 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

482.3 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

30.87 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

48 +500.0%

Tensor Cores

—

192

Power

TDP

15 W

250 W

TDP (W)

250 +1566.7%

Suggested PSU

—

600 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

Phoenix

GB205

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

GeForce 50

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

31,100 million

Die Size

178 mm²

263 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

142.6M / mm²

118.3M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

245 mm 9.6 inches

Height

—

115 mm 4.5 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

549 USD

Production

Active

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 40

Successor

—

GeForce 60

View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 5070

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons