NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Lisuan Tech LX PRO
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO
The Verdict
The recorded data positions the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti as the higher-performing option by a substantial margin, despite the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offering more memory and a newer release date. The RTX 5070 Ti carries an average benchmark score of 49,957 across all recorded tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX PRO, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. The RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice for users prioritizing measured performance, as it also holds a 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 rate versus the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS, a 78.8% advantage in raw single-precision compute.
The LX PRO, however, is not without its strengths. It provides 24 GB of GDDR6 memory compared to 16 GB of GDDR7 on the NVIDIA card, and its FP16 throughput reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 11.9% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 figure. The LX PRO also draws less power, with a 225 W TDP versus 300 W, and requires a smaller 550 W suggested PSU instead of 700 W. Users who need large memory capacity for data-heavy workloads or who prioritize FP16 compute might consider the LX PRO, but the lack of any recorded benchmark data makes its real-world performance unverified in this database.
The RTX 5070 Ti’s nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 50,951 average score (2% higher), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50,001 (0.1% higher), the Intel Arc A550M at 49,737 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 48,477 (3.1% lower). These deltas are small, indicating the RTX 5070 Ti sits in a tightly contested performance band. For any user seeking verified, competitive performance, the RTX 5070 Ti stands as the data-backed selection.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two cards?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti records an average benchmark score of 49,957 across ten tests, while the LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0. The RTX 5070 Ti also achieves an 86th percentile rank versus the LX PRO’s 50th percentile.
Q: Which card has more memory and what type?
A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 107.4% higher bandwidth.
Q: How do the FP32 and FP16 compute rates compare?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), meaning the LX PRO is 11.9% ahead in FP16 but 78.8% behind in FP32.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both use a dual-slot design and a single 16-pin power connector.
Q: Which card has ray tracing and tensor cores?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The LX PRO lists no RT core or tensor core counts in the database, so its ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities are not specified.
Q: How do the nearest rivals compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Arc A550M is 0.4% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is 3.1% behind, based on average benchmark scores.
Architecture Differences
The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density can be calculated.
The NVIDIA card implements 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, which are absent from the LX PRO’s specification sheet. The LX PRO uses 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, matching the RTX 5070 Ti in ROP count but trailing in shading units by 45.8% and in TMUs by 45.8% as well.
The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory clocked at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed on a 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card’s bandwidth is 107.4% higher, despite having 33.3% less capacity.
The bus interfaces also differ: the RTX 5070 Ti runs on PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO runs on PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference in Vulkan support.
Display outputs are another point of distinction. The RTX 5070 Ti offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI output listed. Both cards are dual-slot designs with a 48 mm width, but the RTX 5070 Ti is longer at 304 mm versus 248 mm, and taller at 137 mm versus 118 mm.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, while the LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks. The memory clock differs as well: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO.
Shading units: the RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960, the LX PRO has 6,144. TMUs: 280 versus 192. ROPs are equal at 96 for both. The RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores; the LX PRO has none listed. Pixel rate: 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 22.6% advantage for NVIDIA. Texture rate: 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, an 78.8% advantage for NVIDIA.
FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, an 78.8% lead for the RTX 5070 Ti. FP16 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), an 11.9% lead for the LX PRO. TDP: 300 W versus 225 W. Suggested PSU: 700 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16.
Memory capacity: 16 GB versus 24 GB. Memory type: GDDR7 versus GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit versus 192-bit. Bandwidth: 896.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm. Release date: 2025-02-19 versus 2026-03-16. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards, and the LX PRO has zero recorded benchmark scores. The comparison must therefore rely on the RTX 5070 Ti’s individual benchmark results and the specification-derived compute rates.
In FP32 compute, the RTX 5070 Ti achieves 43.94 TFLOPS, which is 78.8% higher than the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS. This translates directly to faster single-precision shader work, a critical factor in gaming and general compute. The texture rate shows a similar gap: 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, again 78.8% higher for the NVIDIA card. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 22.6% lead.
Memory bandwidth is where the NVIDIA card wins most decisively. At 896.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, the RTX 5070 Ti offers more than double the bandwidth, a 107.4% increase. This matters for high-resolution textures and large data sets, though the LX PRO’s 24 GB capacity could offset bandwidth limits in capacity-bound scenarios.
The LX PRO’s single recorded advantage is FP16 throughput. At 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, it exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti’s 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) by 11.9%. For FP16-heavy workloads such as certain AI inference tasks, the LX PRO could process faster, assuming the architecture delivers on its spec sheet.
The RTX 5070 Ti’s recorded benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6,604, Geekbench OpenCL of 212,363, Geekbench Vulkan of 225,122, and Passmark GPU Compute of 20,203. Its Passmark G3D score is 32,974, with DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores of 351, 192, 300, and 127 respectively. The G2D score is 1,332. The LX PRO has no comparable data, so no direct benchmark deltas can be calculated.
The nearest rivals to the RTX 5070 Ti provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50,951, which is 2% higher. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49,737, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48,477, 3.1% lower. These narrow deltas suggest the RTX 5070 Ti competes within a tight performance envelope, neither dominating nor being dominated by its closest measured competitors. The LX PRO, with no rivals listed and no scores, cannot be placed in this context from recorded data.