NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA Rubin GPU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. This places the card at the 36th percentile among all GPUs tracked in the database. Its average benchmark score is 6270. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Consequently, there is no direct head-to-head comparison available from measured results. The data shows that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a fully measured product with an active production status, while the Rubin GPU is also listed as active but lacks any recorded benchmark scores.

When placing the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in context, its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which has an identical average score of 6270, representing a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% higher. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a narrow performance band around the 6270 mark. The Rubin GPU, with no benchmarks and no rivals listed, cannot be compared quantitatively in any benchmark discipline.

The absence of a measured head-to-head result does not prevent an architectural comparison. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Rubin GPU delivers 130.0 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Rubin GPU is 2.96 times higher in raw FP32 throughput. For FP16, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Rubin GPU delivers 260.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, a 5.92 times difference. Texture rate on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 686.6 GTexel/s, while the Rubin GPU achieves 2,031.2 GTexel/s, roughly 2.96 times higher. Pixel rate is the one metric where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER leads: 235.4 GPixel/s versus 54.41 GPixel/s, a 4.33 times advantage for the GeForce card. This stems from the Rubin GPU having only 24 ROPs, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 96 ROPs.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in pixel fill rate. With 96 ROPs and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, it achieves 235.4 GPixel/s. The Rubin GPU, despite having 28,672 shading units, uses only 24 ROPs, resulting in 54.41 GPixel/s. This makes the GeForce card far more effective for rasterization workloads that depend on pixel output, such as traditional game rendering at high resolutions. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a higher base clock of 2295 MHz versus 700 MHz, and a slightly higher boost clock of 2452 MHz versus 2267 MHz. The GeForce card is designed for client graphics, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, plus support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Rubin GPU has no display outputs and lists its API support as N/A, confirming its server-oriented role.

The Rubin GPU wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 130.0 TFLOPS is 2.96 times that of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Its FP16 performance of 260.0 TFLOPS is 5.92 times higher. Texture rate of 2,031.2 GTexel/s is 2.96 times higher. Memory bandwidth is dramatically higher: 22.1 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s, a 24.7 times advantage. Memory capacity is 288 GB versus 16 GB, an 18 times advantage. The Rubin GPU uses HBM4 with a 16384-bit bus, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus. These figures position the Rubin GPU for HPC, AI training, and large-scale server workloads, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER targets high-end desktop gaming and workstation tasks.

The database shows no overlapping benchmark wins between the two products because only one product has benchmark data. The percentile rankings reinforce this split: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, while the Rubin GPU is listed at the 50th percentile despite having zero average benchmark score. This percentile value appears to reflect its server classification rather than measured performance, as no test results exist for the Rubin GPU.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Rubin GPU uses the GR100 chip based on the Rubin architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It contains 336,000 million transistors on a 1456 mm² die, with a transistor density of 230.8 million per square millimeter. The Rubin GPU has 7.37 times more transistors and a die that is 3.85 times larger, while achieving nearly double the transistor density due to the more advanced process node.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with memory clock at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. The Rubin GPU has 288 GB of HBM4 on a 16384-bit bus, with memory clock at 2695 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 22.1 TB/s. The Rubin GPU's bus width is 64 times wider, and its bandwidth is 24.7 times higher. The Rubin GPU's memory clock is lower in raw MHz but the effective data rate and bus width more than compensate.

Compute resources differ substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Rubin GPU has 28,672 shading units, 896 TMUs, 24 ROPs, no listed RT core count, and 896 tensor cores. The Rubin GPU offers 3.2 times more shading units, 3.2 times more TMUs, and 3.2 times more tensor cores, but only one quarter of the ROPs. The RT core field for the Rubin GPU is null, meaning no ray tracing core data is recorded.

Power and physical specifications differ greatly. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Rubin GPU has a TDP of 2300 W, uses an SXM module form factor, has no listed power connectors, and requires a suggested PSU of 2700 W. The Rubin GPU has no physical dimensions listed. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the GeForce card, PCIe 6.0 x16 for the Rubin GPU.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the Rubin GPU has no recorded launch MSRP. The GeForce card's release date is 2025-12-31, and the Rubin GPU shares the same release date. The Rubin GPU's predecessor is listed as Server Blackwell, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no predecessor recorded. Neither product has a successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA Rubin GPU delivers 130.0 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 2.96 times the 43.94 TFLOPS of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Rubin GPU has 22.1 TB/s of memory bandwidth using HBM4 on a 16384-bit bus, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 896.0 GB/s using GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Rubin GPU's bandwidth is 24.7 times higher.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER have any performance advantage?

A: Yes, its pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s is 4.33 times higher than the Rubin GPU's 54.41 GPixel/s, driven by 96 ROPs versus 24 ROPs.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Rubin GPU?

A: No. The database records no benchmark entries for the Rubin GPU, and its average benchmark score is 0. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5.

Q: What are the transistor counts and process nodes?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The Rubin GPU uses a 3 nm process with 336,000 million transistors on a 1456 mm² die.

Q: How do the physical form factors differ?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm, using one 16-pin power connector with a 350 W TDP. The Rubin GPU is an SXM module with a 2300 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 2700 W, with no dimensions or power connector listed.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in every major specification category. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the Rubin GPU uses the GR100 chip on Rubin architecture. Process nodes are 5 nm versus 3 nm, both from TSMC. Transistor count is 45,600 million versus 336,000 million, and die size is 378 mm² versus 1456 mm². Transistor density is 120.6M per mm² versus 230.8M per mm².

Clock speeds differ: base clock 2295 MHz versus 700 MHz, boost clock 2452 MHz versus 2267 MHz, and memory clock 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 2695 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). Memory configuration shows 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus versus 288 GB HBM4 on a 16384-bit bus, with bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 22.1 TB/s.

Compute units differ: shading units 8,960 versus 28,672, TMUs 280 versus 896, ROPs 96 versus 24, RT cores 70 versus null, and tensor cores 280 versus 896. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 54.41 GPixel/s, texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 2,031.2 GTexel/s, FP32 is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 130.0 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 260.0 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specs show TDP of 350 W versus 2300 W, slot width of dual-slot versus SXM module, power connector of 1x 16-pin versus none listed, and suggested PSU of none versus 2700 W. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 6.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b versus no outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 for the GeForce card, while the Rubin GPU lists N/A for all three. Dimensions are 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm for the GeForce card, with none recorded for the Rubin GPU. The GeForce card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the Rubin GPU has no launch MSRP. The Rubin GPU lists its predecessor as Server Blackwell, while the GeForce card has none. Both share the release date of 2025-12-31 and active production status. The GeForce card is in the 36th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 6270, while the Rubin GPU is in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 and no rivals listed.