NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records only one benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so a direct head-to-head comparison of measured performance is not possible. Instead, the available data must be interpreted through the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score and its position relative to other GPUs.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds an average benchmark score of 6270, placing it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest recorded rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches that average score exactly with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8 percent with a score of 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 sits 0.2 percent higher at 6282, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9 percent at 6327. These deltas are minor, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a tightly clustered performance band around its average score in the database's measurements.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, by contrast, has no average benchmark score recorded and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking of 50 is derived from its specifications rather than from measured results, meaning there is no empirical score to compare against the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The database shows zero wins for either product in head-to-head testing, as no head-to-head benchmark entries exist for this pair.

Given the absence of direct measurements for the RTX 5000 Embedded, any performance assessment must rely on the architectural and specification data in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the RTX 5000 Embedded provides 32.69 TFLOPS, a gap of roughly 34 percent in raw shader compute. Pixel fill rates tell a similar story: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER reaches 235.4 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s for the RTX 5000 Embedded, an advantage of about 25 percent. Texture rate favors the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as well, with 686.6 GTexel/s compared to 510.7 GTexel/s, a lead of roughly 34 percent.

Memory bandwidth is another clear differentiator. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR7 memory across a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s, whereas the RTX 5000 Embedded uses GDDR6 on the same 256-bit bus but only reaches 576.0 GB/s. That is a 55.6 percent bandwidth advantage for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, which directly impacts memory-bound workloads. Both cards carry 16 GB of memory, so capacity is identical, but the type and effective speed differ substantially: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5000 Embedded runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The RTX 5000 Embedded operates at a much lower 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. Despite having more shading units, texture mapping units, render output units, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores, the RTX 5000 Embedded cannot match the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's throughput because its clocks are significantly lower. The RTX 5000 Embedded does lead in raw resource counts: 9728 shading units versus 8960, 304 TMUs versus 280, 112 ROPs versus 96, 76 RT cores versus 70, and 304 tensor cores versus 280. However, the clock deficit overrides that hardware advantage in the recorded throughput figures.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher recorded benchmark score?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a recorded benchmark score in the database, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6269.5 and an average score of 6270. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average score of 6270 exactly matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 0 percent delta. The AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8 percent behind at 6223, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 is 0.2 percent ahead at 6282, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9 percent ahead at 6327.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 896.0 GB/s using GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 28 Gbps effective speed. The RTX 5000 Embedded delivers 576.0 GB/s using GDDR6 on the same 256-bit bus with 18 Gbps effective speed, making the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER about 55.6 percent higher in bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 9728 shading units, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960. The RTX 5000 Embedded also leads in TMUs (304 vs. 280), ROPs (112 vs. 96), RT cores (76 vs. 70), and tensor cores (304 vs. 280).

Q: What are the power consumption figures for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector in a dual-slot form factor. The RTX 5000 Embedded has a TDP of 120 W, uses no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width.

Q: How do the process nodes compare?

A: Both GPUs are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the RTX 5000 Embedded uses the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Transistor densities are 120.6M per mm² and 121.1M per mm², respectively.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and pixel/texture processing. Its FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5000 Embedded's 32.69 TFLOPS by roughly 34 percent, making it the stronger choice for raw compute workloads such as simulation, rendering, and general-purpose GPU tasks. The memory bandwidth advantage of 896.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s, a 55.6 percent gap, gives the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER a clear edge in memory-intensive applications like high-resolution texture streaming, large dataset processing, and bandwidth-bound compute kernels. Pixel fill rate at 235.4 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate at 686.6 GTexel/s versus 510.7 GTexel/s further reinforce its dominance in rasterization-heavy scenarios.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation wins in hardware resource counts, offering more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, RT cores, and tensor cores. That makes it architecturally denser in terms of parallel execution resources, which could benefit workloads that scale with core count rather than clock speed, provided the lower clocks do not bottleneck. Its 120 W TDP is substantially lower than the 350 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, making it far more power-efficient in absolute terms. The RTX 5000 Embedded is an integrated graphics processor with no slot width and no power connectors, so it fits into portable or embedded systems where space and power are constrained. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, in contrast, requires a dual-slot design and a 16-pin connector, limiting it to desktop configurations with adequate cooling and power delivery.

For desktop gaming and high-performance workstation use, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear winner based on the recorded data. It offers superior clock speeds, memory technology, and measured throughput metrics. For embedded or mobile applications where low power draw and compact integration are priorities, the RTX 5000 Embedded is the only viable option, as its IGP form factor and 120 W envelope align with those constraints. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 5000 Embedded uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the former a newer bus interface for faster data transfer to the host system. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the RTX 5000 Embedded's outputs are portable device dependent.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs share several specifications: both have 16 GB of memory on a 256-bit bus, both use a 5 nm TSMC process, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both are currently marked as active in production. The differences are extensive elsewhere.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 5000 Embedded uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 50 generation, while the RTX 5000 Embedded belongs to the Ada-MW generation. Transistor counts are close but not identical: 45,600 million for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 45,900 million for the RTX 5000 Embedded. Die sizes are similarly close at 378 mm² versus 379 mm², with transistor densities of 120.6M per mm² and 121.1M per mm², respectively.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the RTX 5000 Embedded runs at 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. Memory clocks differ as well: 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the RTX 5000 Embedded. Memory type differs too, with GDDR7 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and GDDR6 on the RTX 5000 Embedded.

Core counts favor the RTX 5000 Embedded across the board: 9728 shading units versus 8960, 304 TMUs versus 280, 112 ROPs versus 96, 76 RT cores versus 70, and 304 tensor cores versus 280. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER counters with higher pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s vs. 188.2 GPixel/s), texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s vs. 510.7 GTexel/s), and FP32 throughput (43.94 TFLOPS vs. 32.69 TFLOPS). FP16 performance matches each card's FP32 figure at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications are strongly divergent. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RTX 5000 Embedded has a TDP of 120 W, is an IGP with no slot width, uses no power connectors, and has no recorded dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 5000 Embedded uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are fixed on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the RTX 5000 Embedded is portable device dependent.

Release timing also differs, with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER having a release date of 2025-12-31 and the RTX 5000 Embedded having a release date of 2023-03-20. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no predecessor or successor listed, while the RTX 5000 Embedded lists Ampere-MW as its predecessor and Blackwell-MW as its successor. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the RTX 5000 Embedded has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, and both use similar transistor counts and die sizes, but the underlying microarchitectures represent different generations of NVIDIA design.

Blackwell 2.0 introduces a different memory subsystem, adopting GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. Ada Lovelace, as implemented in the RTX 5000 Embedded, uses GDDR6 on the same bus width but with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The clock strategy differs as well: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at significantly higher base and boost clocks (2295 MHz and 2452 MHz) compared to the RTX 5000 Embedded (930 MHz and 1680 MHz). This suggests Blackwell 2.0 targets higher frequency operation, while Ada Lovelace in this embedded variant is tuned for lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Embedded has more execution resources per chip: 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has fewer of each: 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. Despite this, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves higher throughput metrics, indicating that its higher clocks and newer memory technology more than compensate for the reduced core counts.

The power envelope is the most striking architectural divergence. The RTX 5000 Embedded operates at 120 W with no power connectors and an IGP form factor, reflecting an embedded design priority on thermal efficiency and minimal physical footprint. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER operates at 350 W with a dual-slot cooler and a 16-pin connector, prioritizing performance over efficiency. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface also differs, with PCIe 5.0 x16 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus PCIe 4.0 x16 on the RTX 5000 Embedded, indicating a newer host interface on the former.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's release date of 2025-12-31 places it later in the product cycle than the RTX 5000 Embedded's 2023-03-20 release. The RTX 5000 Embedded has explicit predecessor and successor entries (Ampere-MW and Blackwell-MW), while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has none listed. These differences confirm that the two cards target distinct segments: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-performance desktop part with active production status and a recorded launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the RTX 5000 Embedded is a low-power integrated solution for portable or embedded systems, active but without a recorded MSRP. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results between them, so the architectural comparison stands as the primary basis for differentiation.