NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 represent two dramatically different eras of GPU design, separated by nearly a decade of architectural evolution. The data reveals a stark performance gulf, yet the Quadro P2000 holds a niche for legacy professional workloads. While the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER posts a Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 against the P2000's average of 6049, the comparison is far more nuanced when examining specific benchmark categories and architectural philosophies.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The primary cross-generational comparison comes from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, placing it in the 36th percentile of all GPUs. The Quadro P2000, with its average benchmark score of 6049, sits just below at the 35th percentile. This near-parity in percentile ranking is deceptive, however, because the Steel Nomad test is a modern, DirectX 12 Ultimate workload that heavily favors the Blackwell architecture's feature set.

Digging into the P2000's individual benchmark results reveals a specialized profile. In Geekbench OpenCL, the P2000 achieves 20125, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 23566. These are compute-oriented tests where the Pascal architecture's 1024 shading units still demonstrate competence. The PassMark suite tells a more fragmented story: the P2000 scores 6956 in G3D, 2933 in GPU Compute, but only 34 in DirectX 10, 47 in DirectX 11, and 28 in DirectX 12. The DirectX 9 score of 124 is notably higher, suggesting the architecture retains strength in legacy API paths that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER simply does not prioritize.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single benchmark entry—6269.5 in Steel Nomad—does not directly correspond to any of the P2000's test suites, making direct apples-to-apples comparisons impossible. However, the nearest rival data provides context. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly (both at 6270 average, 0% delta), while the P2000's closest rival is the GeForce MX230 (6077, -0.5% delta). The 220-point gap between the two cards' average scores (6270 vs 6049) represents roughly a 3.6% difference, but this figure masks the generational leap in raw compute capabilities—the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 versus the P2000's 3.031 TFLOPS, a 14.5x difference in theoretical peak throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better raw compute performance according to the data?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER absolutely dominates in FP32 compute, rated at 43.94 TFLOPS versus the P2000's 3.031 TFLOPS—a roughly 14.5x advantage. The FP16 comparison is even more lopsided: 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) versus 47.36 GFLOPS (1:64 ratio), indicating the Blackwell architecture handles half-precision workloads natively while Pascal treats them as a minor afterthought.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the P2000 provides 5 GB of GDDR5 on a 160-bit bus with 140.2 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's memory bandwidth is 6.4x higher, which directly impacts texture-heavy and large-dataset workloads.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the Quadro P2000 wins?

A: The data shows the P2000 has no direct wins in head-to-head benchmarks (0 wins each), but its PassMark DirectX 9 score of 124 is its strongest legacy API result. The card's Geekbench OpenCL score of 20125 and Vulkan score of 23566 suggest it remains functional for certain compute tasks, though the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's modern architecture would likely outperform in these categories if directly tested.

Q: What is the significance of the percentile rankings?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile of all GPUs (average score 6270), while the P2000 is at the 35th percentile (average score 6049). This near-identical ranking is surprising given the massive architectural differences, suggesting the benchmark pool includes many professional and older cards that keep the P2000's relative position competitive.

Q: How do the nearest rivals frame each card's position?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER exactly matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (0% delta), indicating it delivers identical average performance in this metric. The P2000's nearest rivals include the GeForce MX230 (-0.5%), RTX A400 (-0.5%), AMD Radeon 760M (+0.5%), and Radeon RX 6400 (+0.8%), showing it clusters with entry-level modern GPUs.

Q: Which card supports better display connectivity?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the P2000 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The newer DisplayPort 2.1b standard on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports higher resolutions and refresh rates, though the P2000's four-port configuration may suit multi-display professional setups.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors packed into a 378 mm² die—a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Quadro P2000 employs the GP106 chip on the Pascal architecture, using TSMC's 16 nm process with 4,400 million transistors across a 200 mm² die, yielding a density of 22.0M per mm². This represents a 10.4x increase in transistor count and a 5.5x improvement in density.

The Blackwell architecture introduces dedicated ray tracing cores (70 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER) and tensor cores (280), features entirely absent from the Pascal-based P2000, which lists null for both. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the P2000 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, indicating some software API parity despite the hardware divide. The shading unit count tells the story: 8960 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 1024 on the P2000—an 8.75x difference. Texture mapping units (280 vs 64) and ROPs (96 vs 40) follow similar patterns, with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivering 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate versus 94.72 GTexel/s on the P2000.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet reveals a comprehensive generational upgrade. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and boost of 2452 MHz, compared to the P2000's 1076 MHz base and 1480 MHz boost—the Blackwell card runs at more than double the clock speed. Memory configurations diverge sharply: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus versus 5 GB GDDR5 on a 160-bit bus. The memory clock reads 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 1752 MHz (7 Gbps effective) on the P2000, yielding bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 140.2 GB/s.

Power requirements reflect the performance gap: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP requiring a single 16-pin connector and dual-slot cooling, while the P2000 draws just 75 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W, fitting in a single-slot form factor. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width; the P2000 is smaller at 196 mm length and 111 mm height with no width specified. Bus interface differs as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 on the newer card versus PCIe 3.0 x16 on the P2000. Production status distinguishes an Active card (RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, released December 2025) from an End-of-life product (P2000, released February 2017).

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the superior performer for modern workloads, with 14.5x the FP32 compute, 6.4x the memory bandwidth, and a 10.4x transistor advantage. Its 8960 shading units and dedicated RT/tensor cores position it for contemporary gaming and AI-accelerated tasks. However, the Quadro P2000's 75 W power draw, single-slot design, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs make it a viable option for legacy professional environments requiring multiple displays with minimal power infrastructure. The P2000's End-of-life status and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's Active production status further cement the latter as the forward-looking choice. For users running modern DirectX 12 Ultimate applications, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear statistical winner; for those maintaining older workstation setups with specific multi-display needs and power constraints, the P2000 retains practical utility.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in every category where modern performance matters. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) capabilities enable high-throughput compute, while the 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and machine learning inference that the P2000 cannot attempt. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets and high-resolution textures, and the PCIe 5.0 interface doubles the data transfer ceiling of the P2000's PCIe 3.0. The 96 ROPs and 280 TMUs deliver pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s, respectively—roughly 4x and 7x the P2000's rates.

The Quadro P2000's wins are more situational. Its 75 W TDP with no external power connectors makes it suitable for systems with limited power delivery, and the single-slot form factor saves space in dense multi-GPU configurations. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs match or exceed the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 4 total outputs (1x HDMI, 3x DP) for pure display count, though with older connector standards. The P2000's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 124 suggests it handles legacy applications more gracefully, and its 5 GB memory, while smaller, may be sufficient for older professional software that does not scale to 16 GB. The 250 W suggested PSU versus 350 W TDP means the P2000 can drop into systems with minimal power headroom, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER demands substantial PSU capacity and a 16-pin connector.