NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA TITAN V Comparison

The benchmark data splits this comparison cleanly by era and intent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins six of nine head-to-head tests, but the NVIDIA TITAN V takes the two most demanding compute-oriented workloads and nearly matches the newer card’s average score. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the faster gaming GPU in DirectX workloads; the TITAN V remains a compute specialist with a narrow but real edge in raw GPGPU throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates the legacy DirectX API suite. In Passmark DirectX 11, it scores 237 against 152 for the TITAN V, a 55.9% advantage that is the largest margin in the entire comparison. DirectX 12 shows a 25.9% lead (102 vs 81), and DirectX 9 shows a 21.6% lead (259 vs 213). Passmark G3D, the aggregate gaming-oriented score, favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 24004 versus 19805, a 21.2% gap. The mobile card also wins Passmark GPU Compute (10101 vs 9263, +9%) and Passmark G2D (981 vs 937, +4.7%).

The TITAN V’s wins are concentrated in Geekbench. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 157265 against 143870, an 8.5% margin. In Geekbench Vulkan, it repeats the exact 8.5% margin with 152117 against 139213. Its third win is marginal: Passmark DirectX 10 at 153 versus 151, a 1.3% edge that is statistically negligible.

The user-facing split is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the DirectX performer, while the TITAN V holds a Geekbench-specific compute advantage. Average benchmark scores reflect this tension — the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 35435, the TITAN V posts 34355, a 3.1% overall lead for the newer card. Both sit at the 80th and 79th percentile of all GPUs, respectively, placing them in the same performance tier despite their architectural distance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundry nodes, different architectures, and different design philosophies. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the TITAN V uses the GV100 chip on a 12 nm TSMC process. Transistor counts reflect the node gap: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile packs 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die (118.3M / mm² density), while the TITAN V fits 21,100 million on a much larger 815 mm² die (25.9M / mm² density). The TITAN V’s die is over three times larger physically, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile crams roughly 47% more transistors into a third of the area.

Architecturally, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is Blackwell 2.0, the TITAN V is Volta. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The TITAN V counters with 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, 96 ROPs, no RT cores, and 640 tensor cores. The TITAN V has substantially more texture and pixel throughput (465.6 GTexel/s and 139.7 GPixel/s vs 266.2 GTexel/s and 115.8 GPixel/s), but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has more raw FP32 throughput at 17.04 TFLOPS versus 14.90 TFLOPS. FP16 tells a different story: the TITAN V hits 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile matches its FP32 at 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1).

Memory is another generational split. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The TITAN V uses 12 GB of HBM2 on a 3072-bit bus with 651.3 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has slightly higher bandwidth despite the far narrower bus, thanks to faster memory clocks (1750 MHz / 28 Gbps effective vs 848 MHz / 1696 Mbps effective). The TITAN V’s power profile is dramatically different: 250 W TDP, dual-slot, requiring a 600 W PSU and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP form factor with 60 W TDP and no power connectors. API support also differs: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the TITAN V is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads with an average benchmark score of 35435, while the NVIDIA TITAN V averages 34355. The newer card is 3.1% ahead overall.

Q: Does the TITAN V win any benchmark by a significant margin?

A: Yes. The TITAN V wins Geekbench OpenCL (157265 vs 143870) and Geekbench Vulkan (152117 vs 139213), both by 8.5%. Its only other win, Passmark DirectX 10, is marginal at 153 vs 151 (1.3%).

Q: How do the two compare in DirectX gaming workloads?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins every DirectX test that shows a meaningful gap. It leads by 55.9% in DirectX 11, 25.9% in DirectX 12, and 21.6% in DirectX 9. It also wins Passmark G3D by 21.2%.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: Both have 12 GB, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the TITAN V uses HBM2 on a 3072-bit bus with 651.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the TITAN V has a 250 W TDP and needs a 600 W PSU with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, and the TITAN V sits at the 79th percentile. Their nearest rivals overlap in average score range.

Specification Differences

The two differ in nearly every major spec category. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process; the TITAN V uses 12 nm. Transistor count is 31,100 million vs 21,100 million; die size is 263 mm² vs 815 mm². Base clocks are 847 MHz vs 1200 MHz; boost clocks are 1447 MHz vs 1455 MHz. Memory type is GDDR7 vs HBM2, bus width is 192-bit vs 3072-bit, and bandwidth is 672.0 GB/s vs 651.3 GB/s.

Shading units are 5888 vs 5120; TMUs are 184 vs 320; ROPs are 80 vs 96. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores; the TITAN V has no RT cores and 640 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 115.8 GPixel/s vs 139.7 GPixel/s; texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel/s. FP32 is 17.04 TFLOPS vs 14.90 TFLOPS; FP16 is 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 60 W vs 250 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is IGP slot width with no power connectors; the TITAN V is dual-slot with 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin and a 600 W suggested PSU. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 vs PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.0 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2) vs 12 (12_1). Release dates are 2025-02-28 vs 2017-12-06. Production status is Active vs End-of-life. The TITAN V’s launch MSRP was 2,999 USD; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin in the comparison is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s DirectX 11 result. It scores 237 against 152, a 55.9% lead that indicates a fundamental advantage in legacy API efficiency. DirectX 12 shows a 25.9% lead (102 vs 81), and DirectX 9 shows a 21.6% lead (259 vs 213). These three results are consistent: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms across the DirectX stack by double digits.

Passmark G3D reinforces this pattern. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 24004 against 19805, a 21.2% advantage that represents the aggregate gaming performance picture. Passmark GPU Compute is closer at 10101 vs 9263, a 9% lead for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Passmark G2D is the narrowest of the RTX wins at 981 vs 937 (4.7%).

The TITAN V’s wins are equally consistent but confined to Geekbench. In OpenCL, it scores 157265 vs 143870 (8.5% ahead). In Vulkan, it scores 152117 vs 139213 (8.5% ahead). The DirectX 10 result (153 vs 151) is effectively a tie, with a 1.3% margin that falls within noise. Notably, the TITAN V’s Geekbench wins come despite lower FP32 throughput (14.90 vs 17.04 TFLOPS), suggesting its higher FP16 rate (29.80 TFLOPS) and larger tensor core count (640 vs 184) carry compute workloads in those specific tests.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins six of nine tests; the TITAN V wins three. But the score distribution matters: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s wins include the largest single margin (55.9%), while the TITAN V’s wins are either narrow (1.3%) or identical in magnitude (8.5% twice). The average scores reflect this — 35435 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, 34355 for the TITAN V — a 3.1% overall edge that understates the gaming gap but captures the compute parity.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. For DirectX gaming, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the definitive choice. It wins DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests, with margins from 1.3% (DirectX 10) to 55.9% (DirectX 11). The Passmark G3D score of 24004 vs 19805 confirms that gaming-oriented workloads favor the newer card by over a fifth. Its 80th percentile ranking, 60 W TDP, and IGP form factor also make it the practical option for a portable system.

For compute workloads measured by Geekbench, the NVIDIA TITAN V retains a measurable edge. Its 8.5% wins in both OpenCL and Vulkan, combined with 29.80 TFLOPS FP16 throughput and 640 tensor cores, make it the stronger card in those specific tests. However, the TITAN V loses Passmark GPU Compute (10101 vs 9263), so its Geekbench advantage does not generalize to all compute benchmarks. The TITAN V’s 250 W TDP, dual-slot size, and 600 W PSU requirement also make it a desktop-only part.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the better all-round GPU. It leads the average benchmark score (35435 vs 34355), wins the aggregate gaming score, and wins the compute aggregate in Passmark. The TITAN V’s Geekbench wins are real but narrow and test-specific. Given that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also offers RT cores, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and PCIe 5.0, the data points to it as the superior modern choice. The TITAN V remains a niche pick for workloads that specifically favor its Volta-era compute layout and HBM2 memory, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins the overall comparison on both score count and margin distribution.