NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA H200 NVL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single directly comparable benchmark between these two GPUs: Geekbench OpenCL. In that test, the NVIDIA H200 NVL scores 334,891, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870. The H200 NVL leads by 57%, a decisive margin in compute throughput. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no recorded wins in the head-to-head comparison, and the H200 NVL takes all available benchmark victories.

The Geekbench OpenCL result reflects raw shader and compute execution. The H200 NVL's 60.32 TFLOPS FP32 throughput versus the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 explains the delta. That is a 3.5x advantage in theoretical FP32 rate, yet the real-world OpenCL gap is narrower at 57%, indicating that memory bandwidth and other system factors also influence the outcome.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's average benchmark score across all its recorded tests is 35,435. The H200 NVL's average benchmark score is 334,891, which is also its only recorded score. The percentile rankings reinforce the separation: the H200 NVL sits at the 100th percentile against all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile.

Rival comparisons from the database place the H200 NVL 3.1% behind the NVIDIA B200, 5.3% ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X, 9.4% behind the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, and 13.2% ahead of the NVIDIA L40S. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits within 2.4% of the NVIDIA T1000, 2.1% above the NVIDIA A2, 1.2% below the AMD Radeon Pro Duo, and 0.2% below the NVIDIA Quadro GV100. These figures show that the H200 NVL competes in the top tier of server accelerators, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile holds a mid-to-upper position among mobile graphics parts.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs use a 5 nm process node from TSMC, but the silicon underneath is entirely different. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built for the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. The H200 NVL uses the GH100 chip with Hopper architecture, part of the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation. The transistor counts diverge sharply: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, while the H200 NVL has 80,000 million transistors on a 814 mm² die. The transistor density is 118.3M per mm² for the mobile chip versus 98.3M per mm² for the server chip, meaning the Blackwell design packs transistors more tightly despite its smaller overall budget.

Memory architecture is a fundamental split. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The H200 NVL uses 141 GB of HBM3e on a 6144-bit bus, delivering 4.89 TB/s. That is over 7x the memory capacity and 7.2x the bandwidth. The mobile GPU runs memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the server part runs at 1593 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective), but the massive bus width difference makes the H200 NVL's bandwidth overwhelming.

Clock speeds also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. The H200 NVL has a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1785 MHz. Despite the mobile part's lower clocks, its pixel rate of 115.8 GPixel/s exceeds the H200 NVL's 42.84 GPixel/s, because the mobile GPU has 80 ROPs versus only 24 on the server part. Texture rate goes the other way: the H200 NVL delivers 942.5 GTexel/s from 528 TMUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile manages 266.2 GTexel/s from 184 TMUs.

Compute resources are asymmetrical. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The H200 NVL has 16,896 shading units, no listed RT cores, and 528 tensor cores. FP32 throughput is 17.04 TFLOPS for the mobile GPU versus 60.32 TFLOPS for the server GPU. FP16 performance flips the ratio: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs FP16 at 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio with FP32), while the H200 NVL runs FP16 at 120.6 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). That means the H200 NVL's FP16 rate is 7x its FP32 rate, while the mobile part's FP16 is identical to its FP32.

The H200 NVL has no display outputs and no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan API support in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display output described as portable device dependent. The server part uses a dual-slot form factor with an 8-pin EPS power connector and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The mobile part is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors and a 60 W TDP. The H200 NVL's TDP is 600 W, ten times higher. Physical dimensions for the H200 NVL are 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no recorded dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The H200 NVL wins in any workload that stresses raw compute throughput, memory capacity, or memory bandwidth. Its 141 GB of HBM3e memory and 4.89 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large model inference and training datasets that would not fit in the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 12 GB GDDR7 pool. The FP16 performance of 120.6 TFLOPS is particularly relevant for AI inference, where mixed-precision operations dominate. The 528 tensor cores provide the matrix math engine for such tasks.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in scenarios tied to conventional graphics rendering. Its 80 ROPs and 115.8 GPixel/s pixel rate exceed the H200 NVL's 24 ROPs and 42.84 GPixel/s. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the H200 NVL has no graphics API support recorded. The mobile GPU is designed to produce frames; the server GPU is designed to crunch numbers. The 60 W TDP versus 600 W TDP also indicates the mobile part can operate in a laptop or compact device, while the H200 NVL requires a server chassis with substantial power delivery.

The Geekbench OpenCL result is the only direct benchmark, and it favors the H200 NVL by 57%. However, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's passmark scores provide context for its graphics-oriented strengths: 24,004 in G3D, 10,101 in GPU compute, 981 in G2D, and DirectX 9/10/11/12 scores of 259, 151, 237, and 102 respectively. The H200 NVL has no recorded passmark scores, so comparisons in that suite are impossible.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload type. The NVIDIA H200 NVL is the choice for compute-heavy server tasks where memory size and bandwidth are paramount. Its 141 GB memory capacity, 4.89 TB/s bandwidth, and 60.32 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it at the 100th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA B200, B300 SXM6 AC, AMD Instinct MI300X, and NVIDIA L40S, all server-class accelerators. The H200 NVL is 5.3% ahead of the MI300X and 13.2% ahead of the L40S but trails the B200 by 3.1% and the B300 SXM6 AC by 9.4%.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the choice for graphics rendering and mobile use. Its 80th percentile ranking, 80 ROPs, and graphics API support make it functional for gaming and workstation visuals. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, AMD Radeon Pro Duo, NVIDIA A2, and NVIDIA T1000, all much lower in performance class. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 2.1% ahead of the A2 but 2.4% behind the T1000 and 1.2% behind the Radeon Pro Duo.

No user should pick the H200 NVL for graphics output, as it has no display outputs and no graphics API support. No user should pick the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile for large-scale compute, as its 12 GB memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are a fraction of the H200 NVL's resources. The 57% OpenCL deficit for the mobile part quantifies the compute gap. These are not competing products; they serve different segments, and the benchmark data confirms that.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA H200 NVL scores 334,891, which is 57% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 143,870.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7, while the H200 NVL has 141 GB of HBM3e.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 672.0 GB/s, and the H200 NVL delivers 4.89 TB/s.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The H200 NVL has no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support recorded.

Q: What are the FP32 and FP16 throughput figures?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.04 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The H200 NVL has 60.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 120.6 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: What are the thermal design power values?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP, and the H200 NVL has a 600 W TDP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA H200 NVL |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB205 | GH100 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Hopper |

| Generation | GeForce 50 Mobile | Server Hopper (Hxx) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | 80,000 million |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | 814 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | 98.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 847 MHz | 1365 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1447 MHz | 1785 MHz |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 141 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | HBM3e |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 6144 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 4.89 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 5888 | 16896 |

| TMUs | 184 | 528 |

| ROPs | 80 | 24 |

| RT Cores | 46 | None listed |

| Tensor Cores | 184 | 528 |

| Pixel Rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 42.84 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 942.5 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 60.32 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 120.6 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 60 W | 600 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 8-pin EPS |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Length | Not recorded | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Height | Not recorded | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2024-11-17 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 Mobile | Server Ada |

| Successor | None listed | Server Blackwell |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 80 | 100 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 35,435 | 334,891 |