NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile shows a substantial performance profile, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided. The RTX 5070 Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation holds a 50th percentile rank but has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating an absence of measured results rather than a literal zero-performance outcome.
Focusing on the RTX 5070 Mobile's individual benchmark results provides the only quantitative performance picture available. In Geekbench OpenCL, the card scores 122238, while its Geekbench Vulkan result is 116960. These two scores are closely aligned, suggesting consistent compute performance across different API workloads. PassMark DirectX 11 testing yields a score of 192, and PassMark DirectX 9 produces 214. The DirectX 12 score is notably lower at 93, while the DirectX 10 result is 129. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 represents the primary gaming-oriented metric, and the PassMark GPU Compute score is 8279. The PassMark G2D score of 896 covers 2D graphics operations, which are typically less demanding than 3D rendering.
Since the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a win count for either side. The winsA and winsB fields both read 0. The comparison therefore rests on the RTX 5070 Mobile's absolute scores and its position relative to other GPUs in the database, not on a direct contest between the two mobile parts.
The RTX 5070 Mobile's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti shows an average score of 29945, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 29928. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti averages 29783, putting it 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 averages 30095, which is 0.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 averages 30433, 1.7% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the RTX 5070 Mobile performs at a level comparable to these desktop-class GPUs despite being a mobile part. The closest match is the RTX 3070 Ti, with a difference of only 0.1%, essentially a statistical tie.
The Verdict
The data shows a clear split: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has a fully populated benchmark profile, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has none. For any workload measurable by the database, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only option with recorded evidence of capability. Its average benchmark score of 29928 and 75th percentile ranking place it ahead of the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation's 50th percentile, though the latter's lack of scores makes direct percentage comparisons impossible.
Who should pick the RTX 5070 Mobile? Anyone seeking a mobile GPU with verified performance data. The card's Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute throughput, while the PassMark G3D score of 20355 suggests solid 3D rendering capability. Its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, are desktop GPUs with similar average scores, which speaks to the RTX 5070 Mobile's relative strength.
Who should pick the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation? The database contains no benchmark results for this card, so there is no measured evidence to recommend it for any specific workload. Its 50th percentile ranking is lower than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 75th percentile, but without scores, the magnitude of any performance gap remains unquantified. The choice would have to rest on factors outside the recorded data, such as the card's Ada Lovelace architecture and its position as a workstation-oriented part, but the database does not contain the necessary metrics to validate that direction.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile?
A: The average benchmark score is 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs in the database.
Q: Does the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for this card. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it holds the 50th percentile ranking.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average score of 29945, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 29928. This makes the two effectively equal in average performance.
Q: What is the RTX 5070 Mobile's best-performing benchmark result?
A: The highest recorded score is 122238 in Geekbench OpenCL, followed closely by 116960 in Geekbench Vulkan.
Q: Which card has the higher percentile ranking?
A: The RTX 5070 Mobile ranks at the 75th percentile, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation ranks at the 50th percentile.
Q: Are the nearest rivals of the RTX 5070 Mobile desktop or mobile GPUs?
A: The nearest rivals are all desktop GPUs: the RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 2080 Ti, AMD Radeon RX 6800, and AMD Radeon RX 6700, with score deltas ranging from 0.1% to 1.7%.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ across several specification fields, though both share some common ground. Both are manufactured by NVIDIA, use a 5 nm process node at TSMC, have 8 GB of memory on a 128 bit bus, 48 ROPs, a 50 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, portable device dependent display outputs, and identical API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.
The RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. Its base clock is 907 MHz, boost clock is 1425 MHz, and memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, belonging to the Ada-MW generation. Its base clock is 1635 MHz, boost clock is 2115 MHz, and memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.
The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Mobile has a pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has a pixel rate of 101.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 203.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 compute are 13.13 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Mobile and 12.99 TFLOPS for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation, both at a 1:1 ratio.
Memory bandwidth differs: the RTX 5070 Mobile uses GDDR7 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The bus interface also differs, with the RTX 5070 Mobile using PCIe 5.0 x16 and the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation using PCIe 4.0 x16. Transistor counts are 21,900 million for the RTX 5070 Mobile on a 181 mm² die, versus 18,900 million for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation on a 159 mm² die. Transistor density is 121.0M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Mobile and 118.9M per mm² for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation.
The release dates also differ: the RTX 5070 Mobile was released on 2025-04-14, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation was released on 2023-03-20. The RTX 5070 Mobile's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile, and it has no successor listed. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation's predecessor is Ampere-MW, and its successor is Blackwell-MW.
Architecture Differences
The RTX 5070 Mobile and RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation represent two distinct NVIDIA architectures. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace. The chip designs differ accordingly: GB206 for the RTX 5070 Mobile and AD107 for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. Both are built on a 5 nm TSMC process, but the transistor counts and die sizes are not identical. The RTX 5070 Mobile packs 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation fits 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The resulting transistor density is 121.0M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Mobile and 118.9M per mm² for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation.
The compute resources show a clear scaling difference. The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and the same 48 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware differs as well: 36 RT cores on the RTX 5070 Mobile versus 24 on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. Tensor core counts follow the same pattern, with 144 on the RTX 5070 Mobile and 96 on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation.
Memory architecture is a major differentiator. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses GDDR7 with a 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses GDDR6 with a 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both have 8 GB capacity on a 128 bit bus. The effective memory clock is 24 Gbps for the RTX 5070 Mobile and 16 Gbps for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. The base clock is higher on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation at 1635 MHz versus 907 MHz, and the boost clock is also higher at 2115 MHz versus 1425 MHz.
The pixel rate is higher on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation at 101.5 GPixel/s, compared to 68.40 GPixel/s on the RTX 5070 Mobile. Texture rates are nearly equal: 203.0 GTexel/s for the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 205.2 GTexel/s for the RTX 5070 Mobile. FP32 and FP16 compute are also close, with the RTX 5070 Mobile at 13.13 TFLOPS and the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation at 12.99 TFLOPS.
The bus interface differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 on the RTX 5070 Mobile versus PCIe 4.0 x16 on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is part of the Ada-MW generation. The release timeline reflects this: the RTX 5070 Mobile came out in 2025, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation arrived in 2023.
Where Each One Wins
Based on the recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is the clear winner in every measurable category. It has a 75th percentile ranking versus the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation's 50th percentile. Its average benchmark score is 29928, while the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no recorded score. The RTX 5070 Mobile also leads in shading units, TMUs, RT cores, tensor cores, memory bandwidth, and FP32 compute, with 13.13 TFLOPS versus 12.99 TFLOPS.
The RTX 5070 Mobile wins on memory bandwidth by a wide margin, 384.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, which directly benefits memory-intensive workloads such as high-resolution textures and large datasets. Its GDDR7 memory type and 24 Gbps effective speed provide a substantial advantage over the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation's GDDR6 at 16 Gbps. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface also gives the RTX 5070 Mobile an edge in data transfer rates compared to the PCIe 4.0 x16 on the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation.
The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation does hold some advantages in the specification data, though these are not reflected in any benchmark scores. Its boost clock of 2115 MHz is significantly higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 1425 MHz, and its base clock of 1635 MHz exceeds the 907 MHz on the RTX 5070 Mobile. The pixel rate of 101.5 GPixel/s is higher than the 68.40 GPixel/s on the RTX 5070 Mobile. These higher clock speeds and pixel rate could theoretically benefit certain workloads, but without benchmark results, the database cannot confirm any real-world advantage.
The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation also has a higher transistor density in terms of die efficiency, though the RTX 5070 Mobile has more total transistors. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation's 159 mm² die is smaller than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 181 mm², which could matter for physical design constraints, but the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers more compute resources in a larger package.
For use cases, the RTX 5070 Mobile suits workloads requiring high memory bandwidth, such as 3D rendering, compute-heavy tasks, and gaming at high detail settings. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 supports this. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation, with its higher clocks and pixel rate, might be intended for workstation tasks that favor those characteristics, but the absence of benchmark data means any such claim remains unverified.
The RTX 5070 Mobile's nearest rivals, all desktop GPUs with similar average scores, further underline its strength. Being within 0.1% of the RTX 3070 Ti and 0.5% of the RTX 2080 Ti places it in high-performance territory. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation, by contrast, has no rival data, so its competitive position cannot be assessed. The database records no wins for either card, but the RTX 5070 Mobile's comprehensive benchmark profile makes it the only part with demonstrated performance.