GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5050

CORE STATE GB207
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2572 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
2,502
geekbench_opencl
20,255
90,334
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
89,381
passmark_directx_10
19
103
passmark_directx_11
52
150
passmark_directx_12
25
66
passmark_directx_9
65
186
passmark_g2d
890
1,113
passmark_g3d
5,310
17,326
passmark_gpu_compute
2,840
9,184

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Throughout this graphics card matchup, RTX 5050 by NVIDIA shows its dominance obviously. If you're gaming at high resolutions, RTX 5050 by NVIDIA steadily outperforms AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) by substantial percentages. This frame rate difference widens notably more at elevated resolutions. This card manages resource-hungry titles with grace. Its technical improvements are evident.

Game performance performance in various resolutions reliably favor RTX 5050 by NVIDIA. Whether it's multiplayer scenarios to heavy productions, RTX 5050 by NVIDIA preserves its advantage. This gaming consistency over multiple workloads indicates core design superiority. Gamers will expect solid experiences irrespective of game type. The capability is notable.

AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) shouldn't be written off completely, yet the performance shortfall versus RTX 5050 by NVIDIA is hard to deny. In cost-sensitive consumers, AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) could nevertheless make value when its smaller cost compensates for the lower power. But, for pure rendering power, RTX 5050 by NVIDIA stands as the undisputed champion. The assessment is obvious. Speed seekers should lean toward RTX 5050 by NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX 5050
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
2,560 +400.0%
Shaders
512
2,560 +400.0%
TMUs
32
80 +150.0%
ROPs
16
32 +100.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
2317 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
2572 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
320.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
24 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
82.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
205.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
13.17 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
205.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
13.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
20 +150.0%
Tensor Cores
80
Power
TDP
15 W
130 W
TDP (W)
15
130 +766.7%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Phoenix
GB207
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
16,900 million
Die Size
178 mm²
149 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
142.6M / mm²
113.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
249 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 5050 Details