GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

CORE STATE GB207
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,365
N/A
geekbench_opencl
84,171
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
53,146
passmark_directx_10
N/A
57
passmark_directx_11
N/A
68
passmark_directx_12
N/A
47
passmark_directx_9
N/A
115
passmark_g2d
N/A
491
passmark_g3d
N/A
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

If analyzing NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics to Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, a benchmark delta gets immediately apparent. NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics takes the advantage in virtually most game we executed. The margin is significant sufficiently to influence everyday gaming performance. Enthusiasts can feel better performance. This verdict is straightforward.

For hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics leaps significantly ahead of Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. The specialized accelerators manage complex global illumination effects significantly more efficiently. Players wanting premium visuals will definitely pick NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics. This real-time ray tracing advantage is substantial. Contemporary titles more and more use ray tracing technology.

The video memory superiority of NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics turns increasingly relevant at demanding detail settings. 4K rendering demands considerable video memory, and NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics provides additional headroom. This results into improved gameplay in VRAM-hungry titles. Next-gen software can continually need additional memory. This edge increases over time.

The bottom line: NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics wins this matchup obviously. Users wanting graphics performance will strongly choose NVIDIA's RTX 5050 graphics over Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. This benchmark numbers demonstrates this assessment. Your titles might render significantly more fluidly. It's a obvious victor in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5050 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
2,560 0.0%
Shaders
2,560
2,560 0.0%
TMUs
80
80 0.0%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
SM Count
20
20 0.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1020 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
32 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
120.0 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.680 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
120.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.680 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
20
20 0.0%
Tensor Cores
80
80 0.0%
Power
TDP
50 W
95 W
TDP (W)
50
95 +90.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB207
GA107
Generation
GeForce 50 Mobile
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
16,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
149 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
113.4M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 40 Mobile
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details