GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090

CORE STATE AD102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2520 MHz

TDP 450 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

378

9,223

geekbench_opencl

23,468

255,416

geekbench_vulkan

21,965

271,631

passmark_directx_10

N/A

224

passmark_directx_11

N/A

326

passmark_directx_12

N/A

150

passmark_directx_9

N/A

397

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,299

passmark_g3d

N/A

38,194

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

26,613

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Looking at the test numbers for NVIDIA RTX 4090 graphics card and GeForce AMD Radeon 680M, a clear pattern unfolds. NVIDIA RTX 4090 graphics card steadily produces superior scores in the testing. This speed advantage varies from significant to impressive according to the individual benchmark. This reliability points to core engineering superiority. Buyers wanting visual capability should pay attention.

When users making a investment determination, NVIDIA RTX 4090 graphics card emerges as the recommended option. Its dependable benchmark superiority over GeForce AMD Radeon 680M renders it the smarter choice for demanding builders. Consider your individual requirements, but this data guides toward NVIDIA RTX 4090 graphics card. Reach an informed selection. The performance difference is measurable and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

680M

RTX 4090

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

16,384 +2033.3%

Shaders

768

16,384 +2033.3%

TMUs

512 +966.7%

ROPs

176 +450.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

128

Clocks

Base Clock

2000 MHz

2235 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

2520 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

24,576

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

384 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

1.01 TB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

72 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

70.40 GPixel/s

443.5 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

1,290.2 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

82.58 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

1,290.2 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

128 +966.7%

Tensor Cores

—

512

Power

TDP

50 W

450 W

TDP (W)

450 +800.0%

Suggested PSU

—

850 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

Rembrandt+

AD102

Generation

Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)

GeForce 40

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

13,100 million

76,300 million

Die Size

208 mm²

609 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

63.0M / mm²

125.3M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.0

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

304 mm 12 inches

Height

—

137 mm 5.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,599 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Vega II IGP

GeForce 30

Successor

Navi III IGP

GeForce 50

View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce RTX 4090 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 680M

GeForce RTX 4090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons