GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce MX550

CORE STATE TU117SB
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1320 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090 D

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2520 MHz
TDP 425 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
20,372
278,621
geekbench_vulkan
32,469
246,941
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
8,587

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

If analyzing NVIDIA's RTX 4090 against GeForce NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a frame rate gap turns obviously evident. NVIDIA's RTX 4090 secures the advantage in almost most benchmark we ran. This gap is notable sufficiently to influence practical gaming quality. Players might experience improved gameplay. The verdict is obvious.

The VRAM edge of NVIDIA's RTX 4090 gets particularly important at demanding resolutions. 4K scenarios requires substantial VRAM, and NVIDIA's RTX 4090 delivers extra headroom. This translates into better performance in demanding workloads. Upcoming games might continually consume more graphics memory. This benefit grows over releases.

The graphics memory superiority of NVIDIA's RTX 4090 becomes particularly important at increased quality levels. 4K scenarios consumes significant video memory, and NVIDIA's RTX 4090 offers extra headroom. The leads into enhanced gameplay in VRAM-hungry titles. Next-gen games will only need extra graphics memory. This advantage grows over releases.

When those making a acquisition determination, NVIDIA's RTX 4090 emerges as the advised option. Its steady gaming lead over GeForce NVIDIA GeForce MX550 renders it the smarter choice for performance-oriented builders. Weigh your particular workloads, but the benchmarks points toward NVIDIA's RTX 4090. Base an informed selection. The gaming difference is significant and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
MX550
RTX 4090 D
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
14,592 +1325.0%
Shaders
1,024
14,592 +1325.0%
TMUs
32
456 +1325.0%
ROPs
16
176 +1000.0%
SM Count
16
114 +612.5%
Clocks
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
1320 MHz
2520 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
2 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
24,576 +1100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
96.00 GB/s
1.01 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
72 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
21.12 GPixel/s
443.5 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
42.24 GTexel/s
1,149.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS
73.54 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
42.24 GFLOPS (1:64)
1,149.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS (1:1)
73.54 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
114
Tensor Cores
456
Power
TDP
25 W
425 W
TDP (W)
25
425 +1600.0%
Suggested PSU
800 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Turing
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
TU117SB
AD102
Generation
GeForce MX (5xx)
GeForce 40
Process Size
12 nm
5 nm
Transistors
4,700 million
76,300 million
Die Size
200 mm²
609 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
23.5M / mm²
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,599 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View GeForce MX550 Details View GeForce RTX 4090 D Details