NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of zero in the database, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. The percentile rank for both products sits at 50 against all GPUs, placing them at the median of the tracked performance distribution. Without measured frames per second, compute scores, or synthetic test results, the database cannot establish a raw performance hierarchy between the two. What can be analyzed instead is the theoretical throughput derived from each unit's specification sheet, which reveals distinct strengths in different workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO holds a clear mathematical lead in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 22.7% higher than the RTX 4080 Max-Q's 20.04 TFLOPS. The gap widens dramatically in half-precision work: the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, while the RTX 4080 Max-Q provides 20.04 TFLOPS on a 1:1 basis. That represents a 145.3% advantage for the Lisuan product in FP16 compute, a category that matters for AI inference, certain scientific workloads, and media processing. The pixel throughput also favors the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 108.0 GPixel/s, a 77.8% delta. Texture fill rates follow the same pattern, with the LX PRO posting 384.0 GTexel/s against 313.2 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA part, a 22.6% difference.

The RTX 4080 Max-Q counters with a different kind of efficiency story. Its 60 W TDP is 73.3% lower than the LX PRO's 225 W TDP, meaning the NVIDIA part achieves its lower absolute throughput while consuming substantially less power. The shader core count also favors NVIDIA: 7424 shading units versus 6144, a 20.8% advantage in raw execution resources. Texture mapping units number 232 on the RTX part versus 192 on the LX PRO, an 20.8% lead. The NVIDIA chip carries 58 dedicated ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, while the Lisuan specification sheet does not list either feature. That structural difference matters for any workload that uses hardware acceleration for ray tracing or tensor operations.

Memory capacity favors the Lisuan product decisively. The LX PRO ships with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the 12 GB on the RTX 4080 Max-Q. Both use a 192 bit bus and run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding identical bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s. The capacity difference becomes relevant for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and workloads that exceed a 12 GB footprint. The bus width parity means neither card has a inherent bandwidth advantage at the memory controller level, but the LX PRO can hold twice as much working data before spilling to system memory.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is positioned for throughput-heavy tasks that can use its larger memory pool and higher compute ceilings. Its 24 GB frame buffer supports larger model loading, bigger texture arrays, and more extensive rendering scenes without out-of-core swapping. The FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS indicates the hardware is tuned for mixed-precision workloads, and the 2:1 ratio suggests a design that doubles half-precision execution rather than running it at parity. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s give it a fill-rate advantage that favors high-resolution rasterization at aggressive settings. The 96 raster output units versus 80 on the RTX part contribute to that pixel throughput edge. For tasks that saturate FP32 or FP16 pipelines, the LX PRO should finish the job in less time based on the recorded compute figures.

The RTX 4080 Max-Q is positioned for efficiency-constrained environments. Its 60 W TDP allows deployment in thin-and-light portable systems where the LX PRO's 225 W requirement would be impractical. The slot width of IGP (integrated graphics processor) on the NVIDIA part, combined with no power connectors, indicates a board design that draws everything from the platform rather than requiring a dedicated PSU connection. The shading unit count at 7424 exceeds the LX PRO by 1280 units, which suggests better occupancy in workloads that are latency-bound rather than throughput-bound, such as certain real-time rendering paths. The dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores are features absent from the LX PRO specification, giving the NVIDIA product hardware acceleration paths that the Lisuan part would need to emulate in general-purpose compute. The FP32 to FP16 parity at 20.04 TFLOPS means the RTX 4080 Max-Q does not lose half-precision performance relative to its single-precision rate, which is useful for applications that require consistent throughput across precision formats.

The database shows zero wins for either product in the head-to-head field, so the analysis rests entirely on theoretical specifications. The LX PRO wins on raw compute, memory capacity, and fill rates. The RTX 4080 Max-Q wins on power efficiency, shader count, and feature-specific hardware. Neither product has a recorded benchmark score to validate these theoretical positions in real workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from completely different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q uses the AD104 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across 294 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on a TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so density cannot be computed for comparison. The process node difference, 5 nm versus 6 nm, favors the NVIDIA part in terms of manufacturing geometry, though the LX PRO has a one-generation newer release date.

The RTX 4080 Max-Q belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation, succeeding the GeForce 30 Mobile line and preceding the GeForce 50 Mobile. The LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation with no listed predecessor or successor. The NVIDIA part carries the AD104 chip name, while the Lisuan part uses 7G105, indicating a proprietary silicon design rather than a known industry standard. The Ada Lovelace architecture includes ray tracing cores numbered at 58 and tensor cores at 232, both absent from the LX PRO specification. The TrueGPU architecture from Lisuan Tech does not disclose equivalent acceleration blocks, which either means they are not present or are not tracked in the same metric.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan support differs: the RTX 4080 Max-Q lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3. That is a minor API version delta but could matter for applications that rely on newer Vulkan extensions. The process node difference of 5 nm versus 6 nm is the primary manufacturing distinction, and the transistor density number for the RTX part, 121.8M per mm², has no counterpart for the LX PRO since its die size is unknown.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets show several direct points of divergence. The RTX 4080 Max-Q has a base clock of 795 MHz and a boost clock of 1350 MHz; the LX PRO lists no base or boost clock values. The memory configuration differs in capacity only: 12 GB versus 24 GB, both GDDR6, both on a 192 bit bus, both at 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The shading units count 7424 on the NVIDIA part versus 6144 on the Lisuan part. Texture mapping units are 232 versus 192. Raster operation units are 80 versus 96. The RTX 4080 Max-Q lists 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists neither.

The power profile differs sharply. The RTX 4080 Max-Q has a TDP of 60 W, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. The NVIDIA part is classified as IGP slot width with no power connectors, meaning it is designed for integration into a system board. The LX PRO is dual-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The physical dimensions of the LX PRO are recorded at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the RTX 4080 Max-Q has no dimensions listed because it is an integrated part. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both. Display outputs differ: the RTX 4080 Max-Q is marked as portable device dependent, while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The FP16 throughput ratio splits the two. The RTX 4080 Max-Q runs FP16 at 20.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The LX PRO runs FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its half-precision execution units are twice as wide as its single-precision units. The release dates are far apart: the RTX 4080 Max-Q launched on January 2, 2023, and the LX PRO launched on March 16, 2026, a gap of over three years. The production status for both is listed as active. Neither product has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 22.7% higher than the RTX 4080 Max-Q at 20.04 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 4080 Max-Q has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 192 bit bus and provide 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 4080 Max-Q has a TDP of 60 W and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The RTX 4080 Max-Q lists 58 dedicated ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO specification does not list ray tracing or tensor core counts.

Q: Which GPU has higher pixel and texture fill rates?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The RTX 4080 Max-Q delivers 108.0 GPixel/s and 313.2 GTexel/s. The LX PRO leads by 77.8% in pixel rate and 22.6% in texture rate.

Q: What are the API support differences?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. For Vulkan, the RTX 4080 Max-Q supports version 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports version 1.3.