NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two very different GPU options. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a finished product with a full benchmark history, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a newer, active product with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 4070 Ti sits at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,795. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152, 0.8% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, 1.3% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44,075, 1.6% lower), and the Intel Arc A730M (45,592, 1.7% higher). The LX PRO has a 50th percentile ranking and an average score of zero, meaning the database has no performance measurements for it.

The RTX 4070 Ti is the only choice for anyone needing verified performance data. Its benchmark results span multiple DirectX versions, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The LX PRO cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because no scores exist. The RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life, while the LX PRO is active, but the lack of LX PRO measurements makes any performance comparison impossible. The data shows the RTX 4070 Ti as the established, measurable option, while the LX PRO remains unquantified.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use different manufacturing processes and architectures. The RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The LX PRO has no recorded ray tracing or tensor core counts. The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.09 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 rate.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz and 21 Gbps effective, yielding 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti has higher bandwidth, while the LX PRO has double the capacity. Pixel and texture rates favor the RTX 4070 Ti: 208.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and 626.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The RTX 4070 Ti has a 285 W TDP and requires a 600 W suggested PSU, using one 16-pin connector. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, also using one 16-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards. The RTX 4070 Ti measures 285 mm long, 112 mm high, and 42 mm wide. The LX PRO is shorter at 248 mm, taller at 118 mm, and wider at 48 mm. Display outputs differ: the RTX 4070 Ti has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16. API support is nearly identical, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 Ti supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

The RTX 4070 Ti was released in January 2023, with a launch MSRP of 799 USD, and its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series while its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The LX PRO was released in March 2026, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The RTX 4070 Ti is marked end-of-life, while the LX PRO is active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the RTX 4070 Ti and the LX PRO. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and the win counts for both items are zero. This means the two products have never been tested against each other in the recorded data.

What the data does show is the RTX 4070 Ti's standalone performance profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,024. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 176,953, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 213,808. Passmark results span multiple DirectX versions: DirectX 9 scores 352, DirectX 10 scores 187, DirectX 11 scores 288, and DirectX 12 scores 116. Passmark G2D scores 1,200, while Passmark G3D scores 31,624. Passmark GPU compute scores 18,396.

The LX PRO has no benchmark entries whatsoever. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile rank of 50 is a default value, not a measured result. The nearest rivals list for the LX PRO is empty. Therefore, no comparison of wins, losses, or performance deltas can be made between the two cards. The RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals, as listed in the database, are all other products: the RTX 5090 Mobile, Radeon Pro 5500 XT, RTX A6000, and Arc A730M. The LX PRO does not appear in that list.

The data indicates the RTX 4070 Ti's average score of 44,795 places it within 1.7% of the RTX A6000 (44,075), which is the only nearest rival with a lower score. The other three nearest rivals score higher by margins between 0.8% and 1.7%. This tight clustering suggests the RTX 4070 Ti performs at a level comparable to those four products, but the LX PRO's performance cannot be positioned relative to any of them.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The RTX 4070 Ti leads by a substantial margin in this metric.

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6, double the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X. However, the RTX 4070 Ti has higher memory bandwidth at 504.2 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti is listed as end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The LX PRO is listed as active, with no successor recorded.

Q: Does the LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals. The RTX 4070 Ti has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti uses a 5 nm process, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which GPU supports more display outputs?

A: The LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 4070 Ti has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, totaling four outputs as well, but with a different mix of connector types.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins in raw compute performance. Its FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS is 63% higher than the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s is 63% higher than the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s is 8.75% higher than the LX PRO's 192.0 GPixel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is 16.7% higher than the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 4070 Ti also has more shading units (7,680 versus 6,144), more texture mapping units (240 versus 192), and dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores, which the LX PRO lacks in the recorded data. The RTX 4070 Ti supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

The LX PRO wins in memory capacity, offering 24 GB versus 12 GB. It has more raster output units (96 versus 80). Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 22.6% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti's 40.09 TFLOPS, though this comes at a 2:1 ratio versus the RTX 4070 Ti's 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO has a lower TDP at 225 W versus 285 W, and a lower suggested PSU at 550 W versus 600 W. It is shorter in length (248 mm versus 285 mm) and wider (48 mm versus 42 mm), while being taller (118 mm versus 112 mm). The LX PRO uses GDDR6 memory, which is a different type from the RTX 4070 Ti's GDDR6X. The LX PRO is an active product, while the RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life.

The decisive factor is data availability. The RTX 4070 Ti has a complete benchmark profile across ten tests, an 84th percentile ranking, and an average score of 44,795. The LX PRO has no benchmarks, a 50th percentile default, and an average score of zero. For any workload where verified performance matters, the RTX 4070 Ti is the only option with measurable results. The LX PRO's advantages in capacity and efficiency cannot be validated against actual performance data. The RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals are all within 1.7% of its average score, indicating it competes in a tight performance band, but the LX PRO's position in that band is entirely unknown.