NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This lack of data means a direct numerical head-to-head cannot be constructed from measurements. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers an average benchmark score of 31,087 across its tested workloads. Its percentile ranking places it at 76, meaning it sits above roughly three-quarters of all GPUs tracked in the database.

Looking at the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's individual results, the strongest showing comes in the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 199,267. The Passmark G3D test returns 31,811, while the Passmark G2D test yields 1,225. Compute workloads are handled solidly, with Passmark GPU Compute scoring 18,372. In DirectX-specific tests, the card produces 360 in Passmark DirectX 9, 278 in DirectX 11, 181 in DirectX 10, and 119 in DirectX 12. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 5,569, and Geekbench Vulkan reaches 53,683.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provide context for its position. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 posts an average score of 31,206, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31,220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell reaches 31,532, a 1.4% advantage. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX achieves 31,676, leading by 1.9%. These are narrow margins, indicating the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits within a tight cluster of comparable GPUs in aggregate performance.

Since the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmarks, no delta percentages can be calculated between the two cards. The database shows zero wins for each side in head-to-head comparisons. The LX PRO's percentile ranking of 50 is a default position, not a measured outcome, given its average benchmark score of zero.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the available data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only card with verified performance measurements. Users seeking a GPU with a confirmed track record across OpenCL, Vulkan, DirectX, and compute workloads have a clear choice in the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Its 76th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 31,087 demonstrate measurable capability.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has no recorded scores in any test. Its 50th percentile and zero average score reflect an absence of data, not a performance level. The card remains in active production with a release date in 2026, but the database contains no evidence of how it performs in practice. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is noted as end-of-life, yet it retains a full set of results.

For workloads where benchmark verification matters, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option supported by measurements. The LX PRO cannot be recommended or dismissed on performance grounds, as no data exists to evaluate it. The verdict from the database is straightforward: one card has proven results, the other does not.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design philosophies. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. Its process node is 5 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a transistor count of 45,900 million on a die size of 379 mm². The transistor density calculates to 121.1 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO employs the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, using a 6 nm TSMC process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no density figure recorded.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER integrates 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The LX PRO offers 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, marking a structural difference in feature support.

Ray tracing capabilities stem directly from these core counts. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 66 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads. The LX PRO's lack of RT core data suggests it does not advertise such hardware. Tensor cores, which accelerate AI and deep learning tasks, are present in the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER at 264 units but are absent from the LX PRO's specification list.

Compute throughput also differs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, running at a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO posts 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16, using a 2:1 ratio. This means the LX PRO's FP16 output exceeds its FP32 output by a factor of two, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER matches them. For FP32 workloads, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a clear advantage. For FP16, the LX PRO takes the lead on paper.

Texture and pixel rates follow the core configurations. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 689.0 GTexel/s and 250.6 GPixel/s. The LX PRO reaches 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads in both measures, consistent with its higher shader and TMU counts.

API support shows minor differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. This gives the NVIDIA card a newer version of the Vulkan API.

Specification Differences

Memory configurations separate the two cards clearly. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, producing 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clocks at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers higher bandwidth, while the LX PRO offers more capacity.

Power requirements differ. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and suggests a 600 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both use a single 16-pin power connector. Physical dimensions vary: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, taking a triple-slot design. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, fitting a dual-slot layout.

Clock speeds show asymmetry. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER lists a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks, only memory clock data. This leaves the LX PRO's core operating frequencies unspecified in the database.

Display outputs also differ. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI output. Bus interface matches at PCIe 4.0 x16 for both.

Production status separates the cards. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is marked end-of-life, with a release date of January 2024 and a launch MSRP of 799 USD. The LX PRO is active, with a release date of March 2026 and no launch MSRP recorded. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 40 generation, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation with no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 672.3 GB/s over a 256-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outputs 44.10 TFLOPS in FP32, while the LX PRO outputs 24.58 TFLOPS. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by a significant margin.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX PRO. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 ray tracing cores.

Q: Which card has a smaller physical footprint?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm in a dual-slot design. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm by 140 mm by 61 mm in a triple-slot design.

Q: What benchmark scores exist for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the LX PRO. Its average benchmark score is zero, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every category where measurement data exists. Its FP32 compute of 44.10 TFLOPS doubles the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s exceeds the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s by more than 50%. Texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s outpaces 384.0 GTexel/s, and pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s beats 192.0 GPixel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also carries ray tracing cores and tensor cores, features the LX PRO does not list.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins where the specification sheet favors it. Its 24 GB memory capacity exceeds the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB. FP16 compute of 49.15 TFLOPS surpasses the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS. The LX PRO's lower TDP of 225 W versus 285 W suggests lower power draw. Its dual-slot design and shorter length of 248 mm make it easier to fit in compact systems. Four DisplayPort outputs match or exceed the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's three DisplayPort plus one HDMI configuration.

The LX PRO's active production status and 2026 release date indicate ongoing availability, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is end-of-life. For applications requiring large memory capacity, such as handling very large datasets or high-resolution textures, the LX PRO's 24 GB offers more headroom. For applications requiring maximum FP32 throughput, ray tracing, or tensor-based acceleration, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds the advantage based on its specifications.

The absence of benchmark data for the LX PRO means its real-world performance remains unverified in the database. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's measured results place it at the 76th percentile with an average score of 31,087, narrowly trailing rivals like the TITAN RTX by 1.9% and the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4%. Those margins are small, but they are real, recorded figures. The LX PRO's 50th percentile is a placeholder, not a performance statement.