NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA TITAN V Comparison

The NVIDIA TITAN V and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER represent two very different eras of GPU design, and the benchmark data reflects a clear split in their capabilities. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins 9 of the 10 recorded head-to-head tests, dominating in DirectX workloads and compute, while the TITAN V secures a single, massive victory in the Vulkan API test. The data indicates that the newer Ada Lovelace card is the superior choice for modern gaming and general-purpose compute, while the older Volta card retains a niche advantage in specific Vulkan-based applications.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is stark. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the winner for almost every modern workload, taking the top spot in DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests, as well as in OpenCL, 3DMark Steel Nomad, Passmark G2D, G3D, and GPU Compute. This makes it the clear pick for contemporary gaming, content creation, and any application that leverages DirectX or OpenCL. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and higher shading unit count give it a broad advantage across the board.

The TITAN V, by contrast, wins only in the Geekbench Vulkan test. Its score of 152117 in that specific benchmark dwarfs the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 53683, a delta of 183.4% in its favor. This suggests that the TITAN V's older Volta architecture has a particular strength in Vulkan compute or rendering paths that the newer Ada Lovelace implementation does not match. For users running Vulkan-based workloads, the TITAN V is the standout performer, though this is a narrow slice of the overall benchmark suite.

In aggregate, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a higher average benchmark score of 31087 compared to the TITAN V's 34355? No, the data shows the TITAN V has the higher average score at 34355, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at 31087. This is an interesting anomaly, driven entirely by the TITAN V's enormous Vulkan result. The percentile ranks confirm the split: the TITAN V sits at the 79th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is at the 76th percentile, meaning the TITAN V's single strong result lifts its overall standing despite losing most individual tests.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The TITAN V uses the GV100 chip on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 21,100 million transistors on an 815 mm² die. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a much smaller 379 mm² die. The transistor density tells the story of the manufacturing leap: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 121.1M transistors per mm² versus 25.9M / mm² for the TITAN V, a 4.7x improvement in density.

Core configurations differ significantly. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, while the TITAN V has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The newer card has more shaders and fewer texture units. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also brings dedicated hardware that the TITAN V lacks entirely: 66 RT cores for ray tracing and 264 tensor cores. The TITAN V does have 640 tensor cores, but they are from the older Volta generation, and it has no RT cores at all.

Memory is another major divergence. The TITAN V uses 12 GB of HBM2 on a 3072-bit bus, delivering 651.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The newer card has more capacity and slightly higher bandwidth, despite the narrower bus. Clock speeds also favor the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with a base of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz versus the TITAN V's 1200 MHz base and 1455 MHz boost.

The compute throughput numbers reflect these differences. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 and the same 44.10 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The TITAN V offers 14.90 TFLOPS of FP32 and 29.80 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The newer card has nearly 3x the FP32 throughput and matches its FP16 output at full rate. Pixel and texture rates also favor the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s versus 139.7 GPixel/s and 465.6 GTexel/s for the TITAN V.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a consistent pattern of RTX 4070 Ti SUPER dominance, with the TITAN V's Vulkan result being the sole exception. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5569 against the TITAN V's 3565, a 36% advantage. This is a strong indicator for modern DX12 gaming performance.

The compute tests are even more lopsided. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199267 versus 157265, a 21.1% lead. In Passmark GPU Compute, the gap widens dramatically: 18372 versus 9263, a 49.6% difference. This suggests the Ada Lovelace architecture is far more efficient at general-purpose compute tasks, despite the TITAN V's larger die and HBM2 memory.

DirectX API tests show the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER winning across every version. In Passmark DirectX 9, it scores 360 versus 213, a 40.8% lead. In DirectX 10, it scores 181 versus 153, a 15.5% lead. In DirectX 11, it scores 278 versus 152, a massive 45.3% lead. In DirectX 12, it scores 119 versus 81, a 31.9% lead. The older DirectX 11 result is particularly telling, as it shows the newer card is not just better at the latest APIs but also at legacy ones.

The TITAN V's lone victory in Geekbench Vulkan is striking: 152117 versus 53683, which translates to a 183.4% delta. This is the largest margin in either direction across the entire test suite. It indicates that the Volta architecture's Vulkan driver or hardware implementation has a unique strength that is not replicated in the Ada Lovelace card. For Vulkan-specific workloads, the TITAN V is not just better, it is in a different class.

The 2D and 3D Passmark tests also favor the newer card. In Passmark G2D, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 1225 versus 937, a 23.5% lead. In Passmark G3D, it scores 31811 versus 19805, a 37.7% lead. These results reinforce the overall picture of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER as the more capable card for almost every measured task.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN V has an average benchmark score of 34355, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average score of 31087. The TITAN V's single Vulkan win inflates its average despite losing 9 of 10 head-to-head tests.

Q: Why does the TITAN V win the Vulkan test by such a large margin?

A: In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the TITAN V scores 152117 while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53683, a delta of 183.4% in favor of the TITAN V. This suggests the Volta architecture has a specific Vulkan implementation advantage over the Ada Lovelace card.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing. The TITAN V has no RT cores, so it has no hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth, while the TITAN V has 651.3 GB/s. The newer card also has more memory capacity at 16 GB versus 12 GB.

Q: How do the FP32 compute capabilities compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32, while the TITAN V delivers 14.90 TFLOPS. This is nearly a 3x difference in raw single-precision compute throughput.

Q: What are the DirectX 12 scores for each card?

A: In Passmark DirectX 12, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 119 and the TITAN V scores 81, giving the newer card a 31.9% lead. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the TITAN V supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

The Verdict

The data is clear: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior card for the overwhelming majority of workloads. It wins 9 of 10 head-to-head tests, including every DirectX benchmark and all compute-heavy tests. Its 49.6% lead in Passmark GPU Compute and 45.3% lead in DirectX 11 make it the obvious choice for anyone prioritizing modern gaming, content creation, or general compute. The 16 GB memory capacity and 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput give it a substantial performance headroom over the older card.

The NVIDIA TITAN V should only be considered by users with specific Vulkan-based workloads. Its 183.4% victory in the Geekbench Vulkan test is exceptional and indicates that it is the better option for Vulkan compute or rendering tasks. However, this single win does not offset its losses elsewhere. The TITAN V also has no RT cores, making it unsuitable for ray tracing. For all other purposes, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the recommended choice based on the recorded benchmark data.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has a lower launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the TITAN V launched at 2,999 USD. The newer card delivers better performance across almost every metric at a fraction of the original launch price, making it the more practical option for most users. The TITAN V's higher average benchmark score is a statistical artifact of its Vulkan dominance, not a reflection of overall capability.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The TITAN V uses the GV100 chip on a 12 nm process, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process. Transistor counts are 21,100 million versus 45,900 million, and die sizes are 815 mm² versus 379 mm². Transistor density is 25.9M / mm² versus 121.1M / mm².

Clock speeds differ: the TITAN V has a base of 1200 MHz and boost of 1455 MHz, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a base of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz. Memory configurations are different: 12 GB HBM2 on a 3072-bit bus versus 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. Bandwidth is 651.3 GB/s versus 672.3 GB/s.

Shading units are 5120 versus 8448, TMUs are 320 versus 264, and ROPs are 96 for both. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, while the TITAN V has 640 tensor cores and no RT cores. FP32 is 14.90 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel rates are 139.7 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 465.6 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specs also differ: the TITAN V has a TDP of 250 W and uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and a single 16-pin connector. Both suggest a 600 W PSU. The TITAN V is dual-slot and 267 mm long, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is triple-slot and 310 mm long. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.0 + 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for the TITAN V, and 1x HDMI 2.1 + 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The TITAN V supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.