NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA T550 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2610 MHz
TDP 285 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T550 Mobile

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1665 MHz
TDP 23 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
5,569
N/A
geekbench_opencl
199,267
35,521
geekbench_vulkan
53,683
30,801
passmark_directx_10
181
N/A
passmark_directx_11
278
N/A
passmark_directx_12
119
N/A
passmark_directx_9
360
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,225
N/A
passmark_g3d
31,811
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
18,372
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA T550 Mobile

The NVIDIA T550 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER represent two extremes of the GPU spectrum, separated by architecture, ambition, and intended workload. The data shows a decisive victory for the newer, larger card, but the comparison reveals more than just a raw performance gap; it highlights a fundamental divergence in design philosophy between a low-power mobile workstation part and a desktop flagship.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is unambiguous, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER winning both recorded benchmarks. The most significant margin comes in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 against the T550 Mobile’s 35,521. This represents a delta of -82.2% from the perspective of the T550 Mobile, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 5.6 times the raw compute performance in this API. This is not a marginal improvement; it is a generational chasm in processing power.

The gap narrows considerably in the Geekbench Vulkan test, though the result is still a clear victory for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Here, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53,683, while the T550 Mobile manages 30,801. The delta is -42.6% for the T550 Mobile, indicating the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is about 74% faster. This suggests that while the older Turing architecture in the T550 Mobile handles Vulkan efficiently relative to its own capabilities, it cannot match the absolute throughput of the Ada Lovelace part in a modern graphics API.

Looking at the broader benchmark context, the average benchmark score for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 31,087, which is slightly lower than its Geekbench OpenCL score due to the inclusion of other tests like Passmark. The T550 Mobile’s average benchmark score is 33,161, which is higher than its Vulkan score but lower than its OpenCL score. This data indicates that the T550 Mobile is a consistent performer within its class, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s averages are pulled down by less demanding tests, making its peak compute scores even more impressive. In the combined head-to-head, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER claims 2 wins, leaving the T550 Mobile with 0.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is vast, starting with the manufacturing process. The T550 Mobile is built on TSMC’s 12 nm node, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the 5 nm process. This is a direct contributor to the massive difference in transistor density: the T550 Mobile packs 4,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, yielding 23.5M / mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, crams 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1M / mm². This means the newer card has nearly ten times the transistor count in less than double the die area.

The core configurations reflect this disparity. The T550 Mobile is based on the TU117 chip, part of the Turing architecture, and features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster operation pipelines (ROPs). It has no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, using the AD103 chip from the Ada Lovelace architecture, is a different beast entirely: it has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Critically, it also includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features that the T550 Mobile simply cannot perform.

Memory subsystems are equally divergent. The T550 Mobile uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s. This quadruples the memory capacity and offers seven times the bandwidth, which is essential for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy datasets. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also supports PCIe 4.0 x16, while the T550 Mobile is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16.

The feature set and power profiles tell the rest of the story. The T550 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The T550 Mobile is a 23 W part that is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 285 W triple-slot card requiring a 16-pin connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The T550 Mobile’s display outputs are portable-device dependent, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

Given the benchmark data, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable category. Its 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance dwarfs the T550 Mobile’s 3.410 TFLOPS. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also achieves 44.10 TFLOPS in FP16 (1:1), while the T550 Mobile only reaches 6.820 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s, compared to the T550 Mobile’s 53.28 GPixel/s and 106.6 GTexel/s.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice for any workload that demands raw compute, high-bandwidth memory, or ray tracing. Its 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores make it suitable for real-time ray-traced gaming and AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS, which the T550 Mobile cannot handle. The 16 GB memory buffer is also a significant advantage for large 3D scenes or machine learning inference that would exhaust the T550 Mobile’s 4 GB.

The T550 Mobile’s "win" is not in performance but in its form factor and power envelope. As an IGP with a 23 W TDP, it can be integrated into compact, portable devices without dedicated cooling or power delivery. Its 1024 shading units are sufficient for basic 3D acceleration and professional 2D workflows in a mobile context. Its closest rivals, such as the NVIDIA T600 Mobile (deltaPct 1) and the NVIDIA P104-100 (deltaPct 0.5), are similarly low-power parts, confirming its place in the entry-level mobile workstation segment. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s rivals, including the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (deltaPct -1.9) and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (deltaPct -1.4), are all high-end desktop parts, showing it competes at the top of the stack.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior performer in every benchmark recorded. Its lead in Geekbench OpenCL is 82.2%, and in Vulkan it is 42.6%. With a 16 GB GDDR6X memory pool, 8,448 shading units, and full ray tracing support, it is designed for high-end gaming, content creation, and professional rendering. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 76th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with rivals like the TITAN RTX, confirms its high-end status. This is the card to choose for anyone needing maximum compute throughput and modern features.

The NVIDIA T550 Mobile is not a competitor to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER; it is a purpose-built solution for a different problem. Its 77th percentile ranking is remarkably high given its 23 W power draw, but its absolute scores are a fraction of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s. The T550 Mobile is for users who need a capable GPU that fits in a thin-and-light laptop, runs without a discrete power connector, and handles basic graphics tasks. Its rivals include the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (deltaPct 0) and AMD Radeon Pro 570 (deltaPct -0.1), all of which are similarly positioned. If your priority is portability and efficiency, the T550 Mobile is the logical choice; if you need raw power, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option in this comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA T550 Mobile has a higher average benchmark score of 33,161, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 31,087. This is because the T550 Mobile’s two scores (35,521 and 30,801) are both relatively close to its average, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average is brought down by lower scores in other tests like Passmark DirectX 9 (360) and Passmark G2D (1,225).

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the T550 Mobile scores 35,521. The delta is -82.2%, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is approximately 5.6 times faster in this test.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, while the T550 Mobile has 96.00 GB/s. This is a seven-fold difference, enabled by the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 256-bit bus and GDDR6X memory, versus the T550 Mobile’s 64-bit bus and GDDR6 memory.

Q: Does the T550 Mobile support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The T550 Mobile has no ray tracing cores (rtCores is null), while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a transistor density of 121.1M / mm², manufactured on a 5 nm process. The T550 Mobile has a density of 23.5M / mm² on a 12 nm process.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The T550 Mobile has a TDP of 23 W and uses no power connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and requires a 16-pin power connector and a 600 W suggested PSU.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
T550 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
8,448
1,024 -87.9%
Shaders
8,448
1,024 -87.9%
TMUs
264
64 -75.8%
ROPs
96
32 -66.7%
SM Count
66
16 -75.8%
Clocks
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1665 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
48 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
53.28 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
106.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
44.10 TFLOPS
3.410 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
689.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
106.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
44.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.820 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
66
Tensor Cores
264
Power
TDP
285 W
23 W
TDP (W)
285
23 -91.9%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
GPU Name
AD103
TU117
Generation
GeForce 40
Quadro Turing-M (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
45,900 million
4,700 million
Die Size
379 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
121.1M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
7.5
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
IGP
Length
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
799 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30
Quadro Pascal-M
Successor
GeForce 50
Ampere-MW
View GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Details View T550 Mobile Details