NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between these two GPUs is stark, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 claiming victory in every recorded benchmark test. The database includes two head-to-head measurements, both favoring the newer card by substantial margins.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4060 scores 95,057 points, while the Quadro M4000M manages only 19,989 points. This represents a 79% deficit for the older workstation part. The sheer magnitude of this gap highlights the generational leap in raw compute performance, as the RTX 4060 delivers nearly five times the OpenCL throughput.

The Vulkan results tell a similar story, though the margin narrows somewhat. The RTX 4060 posts 48,643 points against the Quadro M4000M's 20,971 points, a 56.9% difference. Vulkan remains the stronger API for the older Maxwell architecture relative to OpenCL, but the Ada Lovelace part still more than doubles the score.

Beyond the head-to-head tests, the average benchmark scores reinforce the hierarchy. The Quadro M4000M averages 20,480 points across all recorded tests, while the RTX 4060 averages 17,639 points. This apparent contradiction stems from the different benchmark suites available for each card. The RTX 4060 has a much larger test portfolio, including DirectX 9 through 12 tests, 2D graphics, and compute workloads, many of which score lower than the Geekbench tests. The Quadro M4000M only has two Geekbench entries in the database, both of which happen to be relatively strong for its era.

The RTX 4060's individual benchmark results show a wide range of performance across different workloads. Its best result comes from Geekbench OpenCL at 95,057 points, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 48,643 points. Passmark G3D delivers 19,545 points, while Passmark GPU Compute reaches 9,213 points. Legacy DirectX tests show lower scores: 236 in DirectX 9, 175 in DirectX 11, 103 in DirectX 10, and 76 in DirectX 12. The 2D score sits at 1,037 points.

The Quadro M4000M's nearest rivals in the database include the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 points (0.3% ahead), the Intel Arc B570 at 20,556 points (0.4% ahead), the Intel Arc A750 at 20,582 points (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 points (0.9% ahead). These margins are negligible, placing the Quadro M4000M squarely in a cluster of mid-range performers from various generations.

The RTX 4060's nearest rivals paint a different picture. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 averages 17,666 points, a mere 0.2% ahead. The AMD Radeon 780M sits 0.3% behind at 17,588 points, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 trails by 0.5% at 17,551 points and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 by 0.7% at 17,509 points. The RTX 4060's average score, weighed down by its diverse test suite, places it among older and integrated-class parts, though its peak scores in modern APIs are far superior.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs spans nearly a decade of NVIDIA design philosophy. The Quadro M4000M uses the GM204 chip built on Maxwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 28 nm process. The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip based on Ada Lovelace, produced on a 5 nm process, also by TSMC.

The transistor counts reveal the density revolution. The GM204 packs 5,200 million transistors across a 398 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 13.1 million per square millimeter. The AD107 crams 18,900 million transistors into just 159 mm², achieving 118.9 million per square millimeter. This represents a ninefold improvement in density, enabling far more compute resources in a physically smaller package.

Core configuration differences are substantial. The Quadro M4000M contains 1,280 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The RTX 4060 more than doubles the shader count to 3,072, increases TMUs to 96, but reduces ROPs to 48. The RTX 4060 also adds specialized hardware: 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the Maxwell part. These dedicated units enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads that the older card cannot handle at all.

Clock speeds have climbed dramatically. The Quadro M4000M runs at a 975 MHz base and 1,013 MHz boost clock. The RTX 4060 starts at 1,830 MHz base and boosts to 2,460 MHz. Memory clocks follow the same trend: the Quadro uses 1,253 MHz GDDR5 running at 5 Gbps effective, while the RTX 4060 uses 2,125 MHz GDDR6 at 17 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration differs in capacity and bandwidth trade-offs. The Quadro M4000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 160.4 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a narrower 128-bit bus, yet achieves 272.0 GB/s thanks to the much higher memory clock. The newer card doubles capacity while adding 69.5% more bandwidth.

Theoretical throughput metrics show the performance gulf. The Quadro M4000M delivers 64.83 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, 81.04 GTexel/s texture rate, and 2.593 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The RTX 4060 reaches 118.1 GPixel/s, 236.2 GTexel/s, and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32. The texture rate improvement is particularly striking at nearly threefold. The RTX 4060 also offers FP16 performance at 15.11 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Quadro M4000M has no recorded FP16 capability.

Power and physical specifications differ meaningfully. The Quadro M4000M carries a 100 W TDP in an MXM Module form factor with no power connectors, designed for portable workstations. The RTX 4060 draws 115 W in a dual-slot layout with a single 12-pin connector and a 300 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4060 measures 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Bus interfaces and display outputs also diverge. The Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 with portable-device-dependent outputs. The RTX 4060 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, though the RTX 4060 achieves DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus the Quadro's DirectX 12 (12_1).

Release timing spans eight years. The Quadro M4000M launched on August 17, 2015, succeeding the Quadro Kepler-M and preceding the Quadro Pascal-M. The RTX 4060 launched on May 17, 2023, following the GeForce 30 series and preceding the GeForce 50 series. Both are now end-of-life products.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 dominates every modern workload category. In compute-heavy applications using OpenCL, it delivers 79% higher scores than the Quadro M4000M. For Vulkan-based rendering and compute, it leads by 56.9%. These are the only two directly comparable tests, and the newer card wins both outright.

The RTX 4060's advantage extends to features rather than just raw numbers. The presence of 24 ray tracing cores enables hardware ray tracing, entirely absent on the Quadro M4000M. The 96 tensor cores accelerate AI inference, machine learning, and DLSS-style workloads. The 8 GB memory capacity doubles what the Quadro M4000M offers, which matters for modern game textures and larger datasets. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth also provides 69.5% more memory throughput.

The Quadro M4000M retains relevance only in legacy or constrained scenarios. Its 64 ROPs exceed the RTX 4060's 48, which can matter in certain fill-rate-limited tasks at lower resolutions. The 256-bit memory bus is wider than the RTX 4060's 128-bit interface, though the newer card's higher clocks compensate. The MXM Module form factor suits specialized portable workstations where the dual-slot RTX 4060 cannot physically fit.

For relative standing among peers, the Quadro M4000M sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 4060 sits at the 61st percentile. This percentile difference reflects the diverse test portfolios each card carries rather than absolute capability. The Quadro M4000M's two Geekbench scores are both strong for its era, while the RTX 4060's broader test suite includes legacy DirectX workloads where modern architectures do not always excel.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 for virtually any workload a user would encounter today. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks by massive margins, offers more memory, more bandwidth, higher compute throughput, and adds ray tracing and tensor core capabilities that the Quadro M4000M simply cannot provide. The 5 nm process node enables this performance in a smaller die while consuming only 15 W more power.

The Quadro M4000M's only advantages are its lower 100 W TDP, wider 256-bit memory bus, higher ROP count, and MXM form factor for specialized portable systems. In 2024, these benefits rarely outweigh the RTX 4060's overwhelming performance lead.

Users running modern applications, games, or compute workloads should choose the RTX 4060. Its 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 8 GB GDDR6 memory, and dedicated RT and tensor cores make it suitable for current software. The Quadro M4000M belongs in legacy workstation deployments where software compatibility or form factor constraints prevent upgrading.

The RTX 4060 carried a launch MSRP of 299 USD, though pricing considerations aside, the performance delta alone justifies the recommendation.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in Geekbench OpenCL performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 95,057 points versus the Quadro M4000M's 19,989 points, a 79% advantage.

Q: Does the Quadro M4000M support ray tracing?

A: No. The Quadro M4000M has no ray tracing cores. The RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Quadro M4000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 160.4 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the transistor density differences?

A: The Quadro M4000M's GM204 chip has 13.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The RTX 4060's AD107 chip achieves 118.9 million per square millimeter.

Q: Which card has higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Quadro M4000M ranks at the 65th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4060 ranks at the 61st percentile. This reflects different test portfolios rather than overall capability.

Q: What form factors do these cards use?

A: The Quadro M4000M is an MXM Module with no power connectors and a 100 W TDP. The RTX 4060 is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, with one 12-pin connector and a 115 W TDP.