NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA H20 NVL16 Comparison

The Verdict

The GeForce RTX 4060 is a consumer desktop graphics card built for gaming and general-purpose rendering, while the H20 NVL16 is a server-accelerator module with no display outputs and a completely different workload profile. The recorded data shows the RTX 4060 holds a database percentile ranking of 61, with an average benchmark score of 17,639 across ten tests, while the H20 NVL16 has no benchmark entries and sits at the 50th percentile. The RTX 4060 is the only one of the two with any measured graphics performance data, so for any task that requires rasterization, DirectX, or display output, the RTX 4060 is the functional choice. The H20 NVL16 targets compute-heavy server environments, as indicated by its 96 GB of HBM3 memory, 4.03 TB/s bandwidth, and 312 tensor cores, but without benchmark scores, its relative performance cannot be quantified. The RTX 4060 is end-of-life, while the H20 NVL16 remains active in production.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a 5 nm TSMC manufacturing process, but they diverge sharply in every other architectural aspect. The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip from the Ada Lovelace architecture, containing 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The H20 NVL16 uses the GH100 chip from the Hopper architecture, with 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die, giving a density of 98.3M per mm². The H20 NVL16 has more than four times the transistor count and a die over five times larger.

The RTX 4060 packs 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, 48 raster output units, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The H20 NVL16 offers 9,984 shading units, 312 texture mapping units, only 24 raster output units, no RT core data, and 312 tensor cores. The H20 NVL16 has more than triple the shading units and more than triple the tensor cores, but its raster output unit count is half that of the RTX 4060. The H20 NVL16 reports no RT core count, reflecting its server orientation rather than a consumer ray-tracing focus.

The RTX 4060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the H20 NVL16 lists all APIs as N/A. The RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The H20 NVL16 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and has no display outputs at all, consistent with its purpose as a compute accelerator that runs headless in a server chassis.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The H20 NVL16 delivers 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth from 96 GB of HBM3 memory on a 6144-bit bus, while the RTX 4060 provides 272.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The H20 NVL16 has roughly 14.8 times the bandwidth.

Q: Are these GPUs comparable for gaming?

A: The RTX 4060 is the only one with benchmark data and display outputs, plus DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The H20 NVL16 has no display outputs, no DirectX support, and no benchmark scores, so it is not suited for gaming workloads.

Q: Which card has higher clock speeds?

A: The RTX 4060 boosts to 2460 MHz, while the H20 NVL16 boosts to 1980 MHz. Both share the same 1830 MHz base clock.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU, while the H20 NVL16 has a 400 W TDP with an 800 W suggested PSU. The H20 NVL16 requires substantially more power delivery.

Q: Does the H20 NVL16 have ray tracing capabilities?

A: The database lists no RT core count for the H20 NVL16, while the RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores. The H20 NVL16 focuses on tensor operations instead, with 312 tensor cores compared to the RTX 4060's 96.

Q: What is the form factor difference?

A: The RTX 4060 is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a 1x 12-pin power connector. The H20 NVL16 is an SXM module with no listed dimensions and no power connector data, indicating a different mounting and power scheme.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification field. The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip from the Ada Lovelace architecture, while the H20 NVL16 uses the GH100 chip from the Hopper architecture. The process node is identical at 5 nm, and both use TSMC as the foundry. Transistor counts are 18,900 million for the RTX 4060 versus 80,000 million for the H20 NVL16. Die sizes are 159 mm² versus 814 mm². Transistor density is 118.9M per mm² versus 98.3M per mm².

Clock speeds differ: the RTX 4060 runs at 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost, while the H20 NVL16 runs at 1830 MHz base and 1980 MHz boost. Memory configurations are starkly different: 8 GB GDDR6 at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) with a 128-bit bus for the RTX 4060, versus 96 GB HBM3 at 1313 MHz (5.3 Gbps effective) with a 6144-bit bus for the H20 NVL16. Bandwidth is 272.0 GB/s versus 4.03 TB/s.

Compute resources: the RTX 4060 has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The H20 NVL16 has 9,984 shading units, 312 TMUs, 24 ROPs, no listed RT cores, and 312 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 versus 47.52 GPixel/s for the H20 NVL16. Texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s versus 617.8 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 15.11 TFLOPS versus 39.54 TFLOPS. FP16 is 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RTX 4060 versus 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1) for the H20 NVL16.

Power and physical specs: the RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP, dual-slot width, 1x 12-pin connector, and 300 W suggested PSU. The H20 NVL16 has a 400 W TDP, SXM module form factor, no listed power connector, and 800 W suggested PSU. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for the RTX 4060, while the H20 NVL16 has none. The RTX 4060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4; the H20 NVL16 lists all APIs as N/A. The RTX 4060 launched on 2023-05-17 with a launch MSRP of 299 USD, while the H20 NVL16 releases on 2025-09-01 with no launch MSRP. The RTX 4060 is end-of-life with a GeForce 50 successor, and the H20 NVL16 is active with a Server Blackwell successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, and the H20 NVL16 has no individual benchmark scores at all. The RTX 4060 has ten recorded benchmark results, all of which stand as the only comparative data points between the two. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4060 scores 2,302. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 95,057. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 48,643. PassMark tests show 103 in DirectX 10, 175 in DirectX 11, 76 in DirectX 12, 236 in DirectX 9, 1,037 in G2D, 19,545 in G3D, and 9,213 in GPU Compute.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4060, based on average benchmark score, are all AMD parts: the Radeon HD 7790 at 17,666 (delta of -0.2%), the Radeon 780M at 17,588 (delta of 0.3%), the Radeon Pro 560 at 17,551 (delta of 0.5%), and the Radeon Pro 460 at 17,509 (delta of 0.7%). This places the RTX 4060 essentially at parity with these older or integrated parts, with a performance spread of less than one percent. The H20 NVL16 has no rivals listed and no average score, so any direct comparison between the two cards is impossible from the measured data. The win count in head-to-head benchmarks is zero for both, reflecting the absence of shared tests.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 wins in every category where measured data exists. It has all ten benchmark scores, a 61st percentile rank among all GPUs, and a working average score of 17,639. It delivers display outputs, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, which is higher than the H20 NVL16's 1980 MHz. Its pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s is more than double the H20 NVL16's 47.52 GPixel/s, indicating a clear advantage in fill-rate-bound raster workloads. The RTX 4060 also has 48 ROPs versus 24 on the H20 NVL16, reinforcing its rasterization focus. Its dual-slot, 240 mm length, and 115 W TDP make it suitable for standard desktop builds with a 300 W suggested PSU.

The H20 NVL16 wins on compute-oriented specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 39.54 TFLOPS is 2.6 times the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1) is 5.2 times the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1). The 312 tensor cores versus 96 gives it a clear edge in matrix operations. Memory capacity of 96 GB versus 8 GB, bandwidth of 4.03 TB/s versus 272.0 GB/s, and a 6144-bit bus versus 128-bit all point to large-scale data processing. The texture rate of 617.8 GTexel/s versus 236.2 GTexel/s supports heavy texture work. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface doubles the bus bandwidth of the RTX 4060's PCIe 4.0 x8. The 400 W TDP and 800 W suggested PSU indicate a server-class power envelope, and the SXM module form factor aligns with dense accelerator deployments. The H20 NVL16 also has a newer release date of 2025-09-01 and remains active in production, while the RTX 4060 is end-of-life.

For a builder choosing between them, the decision hinges on workload. The RTX 4060 is the only option with graphics benchmarks, display outputs, and consumer API support. The H20 NVL16 is the only option with HBM3 memory, massive FP16 throughput, and a server module form factor. Neither card can substitute for the other in its intended role.