NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark suite for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible on a test-by-test basis. The RTX 4060 Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 22,729 across its nine recorded tests, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, meaning no validated performance data exists for it yet.

The RTX 4060 Mobile's individual results show a wide spread across API generations. Its strongest showing is in PassMark DirectX 9 with a score of 216, followed by PassMark DirectX 11 at 157. The DirectX 10 test returns 107, while DirectX 12 drops to 73. In compute workloads, the GPU scores 6,816 in PassMark GPU Compute, and its Geekbench results are nearly identical across APIs: 89,420 in OpenCL and 89,569 in Vulkan. The 2D graphics test records 730, and the overall 3D graphics score is 17,469.

Against its nearest rivals in the database, the RTX 4060 Mobile sits in a tight cluster. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 0.7% (22,895 average score) and the Intel Arc B580 by 1.3% (23,021 average score). It leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8% (22,549 average score) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3% (22,435 average score). These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the RTX 4060 Mobile performs essentially at parity with this group of desktop and mobile parts.

Because the LX PRO has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison rests entirely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured outcomes. The data shows that the LX PRO is an unproven quantity in terms of real-world performance, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has a validated baseline across multiple APIs and compute workloads.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has nine recorded benchmark scores with an average of 22,729.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile is within 1.3% of all four nearest rivals. It is 0.7% behind the RTX 2080, 1.3% behind the Intel Arc B580, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, and 1.3% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 16 GB more memory and 176.0 GB/s more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute specifications?

A: The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs on the RTX 4060 Mobile. The LX PRO also lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 for the RTX 4060 Mobile.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has a TDP of 115 W and uses no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics package (IGP). The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4060 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists no RT core or tensor core counts.

The Verdict

The recorded data favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile for anyone requiring validated performance. It has a complete benchmark profile, a 67th percentile ranking, and competitive scores against established GPUs like the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT. The LX PRO offers no measured results, so any performance claim about it cannot be substantiated from the database.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the choice only for workloads that demand its specific hardware capabilities. It provides 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which are substantial resources for memory-heavy tasks. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) are double the RTX 4060 Mobile's figures in both categories. The LX PRO also doubles the RTX 4060 Mobile in pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 90.72 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s).

For a system builder who needs a working GPU with proven driver support and benchmark validation, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only option with data behind it. For someone who prioritizes raw specifications and is willing to accept an unmeasured product, the LX PRO presents a larger memory pool and higher theoretical throughput. The absence of LX PRO benchmarks makes any definitive performance verdict impossible.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD107 | 7G105 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 18,900 million | unknown |

| Die size | 159 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 118.9M / mm² | null |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Shading units | 3072 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 96 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT cores | 24 | null |

| Tensor cores | 96 | null |

| Pixel rate | 90.72 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.61 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 115 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2023-01-02 | 2026-03-16 |

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². It is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, with unknown transistor count and die size, and is based on a TrueGPU architecture within the 7G100 generation.

The RTX 4060 Mobile integrates 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX PRO lists no RT core or tensor core counts, suggesting either a different compute approach or unlisted capabilities. The RTX 4060 Mobile's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1), while the LX PRO's FP16 is double its FP32 at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating a different execution model for half-precision math.

The LX PRO uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, twice the lane count of the RTX 4060 Mobile's PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX PRO also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the RTX 4060 Mobile's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 4060 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3 for the LX PRO.

The LX PRO is physically a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RTX 4060 Mobile is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with no dimensions listed, no power connectors, and a 115 W TDP. The LX PRO requires a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply, drawing 225 W. The RTX 4060 Mobile's transistor count and die size are known, while the LX PRO's remain undisclosed.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in validated performance and software ecosystem readiness. Its benchmark scores across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, plus OpenCL and Vulkan, provide a complete picture of its capabilities. The 67th percentile ranking and average score of 22,729 place it in the same performance class as the RTX 2080 and Intel Arc B580, with margins under 1.5% in either direction. Its 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores make it suitable for AI acceleration and ray-traced workloads, features the LX PRO does not document.

The LX PRO wins on raw specification sheets. It doubles the RTX 4060 Mobile in shading units, TMUs, ROPs, FP32 throughput, pixel rate, and texture rate. Its 24 GB memory capacity is three times the RTX 4060 Mobile's 8 GB, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 68.8% higher. The 192-bit bus and 18 Gbps effective memory clock provide a wider and faster memory path. The dual-slot card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs supports multi-monitor desktop setups, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's IGP form factor targets laptops and compact devices.

For professionals working with large datasets that exceed 8 GB of VRAM, the LX PRO's 24 GB pool is the clear advantage. For gamers or workstation users who require proven driver stability and measurable performance, the RTX 4060 Mobile's benchmark record is the decisive factor. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement indicate a desktop-only part, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's 115 W TDP and connector-free design suit mobile platforms. The data cannot confirm whether the LX PRO's theoretical advantages translate into real-world wins, as no benchmarks exist for it.