GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1890 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
89,420
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
89,569
53,146
passmark_directx_10
107
57
passmark_directx_11
157
68
passmark_directx_12
73
47
passmark_directx_9
216
115
passmark_g2d
730
491
passmark_g3d
17,469
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
6,816
4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

If analyzing RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) versus Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, a gaming difference turns clearly noticeable. RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) secures the top spot in almost all scenario we performed. The margin is notable sufficiently to change practical gaming quality. Players can feel smoother visuals. This determination is clear.

Playing games benchmarks throughout diverse resolutions reliably favor RTX 4060 (NVIDIA). From fast-paced titles to blockbuster productions, RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) holds its edge. The gaming consistency in different workloads proves fundamental design superiority. Players can count on excellent experiences regardless of game type. This versatility is outstanding.

This memory benefit of RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) grows more important at elevated settings. Demanding workloads demands substantial graphics memory, and RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) delivers extra capability. This leads into smoother gameplay in heavy scenarios. Next-gen software should progressively require additional graphics memory. This advantage increases over generations.

Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is not written off entirely, however its performance difference relative to RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) is tough to ignore. In budget-conscious users, Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile could nevertheless make a choice provided its lower cost compensates for its reduced power. Nevertheless, when pure rendering throughput, RTX 4060 (NVIDIA) is the obvious victor. This conclusion is straightforward. Power enthusiasts will shift toward RTX 4060 (NVIDIA).

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4060 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,072
2,560 -16.7%
Shaders
3,072
2,560 -16.7%
TMUs
96
80 -16.7%
ROPs
48
48 0.0%
SM Count
24
20 -16.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1545 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1890 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
32 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
90.72 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
181.4 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
181.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
24
20 -16.7%
Tensor Cores
96
80 -16.7%
Power
TDP
115 W
95 W
TDP (W)
115
95 -17.4%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA107
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Ada-MW
View GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details