NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1890 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5050

CORE STATE GB207
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2572 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
89,420
90,334
geekbench_vulkan
89,569
89,381
passmark_directx_10
107
103
passmark_directx_11
157
150
passmark_directx_12
73
66
passmark_directx_9
216
186
passmark_g2d
730
1,113
passmark_g3d
17,469
17,326
passmark_gpu_compute
6,816
9,184
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
2,502

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

The data splits this comparison into two distinct narratives: the RTX 4060 Mobile wins six of nine head-to-head benchmarks, including every DirectX legacy test, while the RTX 5050 counters with decisive victories in compute workloads and 2D graphics. The RTX 4060 Mobile holds a narrow edge in overall gaming performance, but the RTX 5050's compute advantage and newer architecture make it the more forward-looking choice for specific workloads. Neither card dominates outright — the average benchmark scores sit just 7.5% apart (22,729 vs 21,035), with the RTX 4060 Mobile ranking at the 67th percentile of all GPUs versus the RTX 5050's 66th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RTX 4060 Mobile's cleanest win comes in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, where it scores 216 against the RTX 5050's 186 — a 16.1% margin that shows the older architecture retains a substantial lead in legacy DirectX workloads. The DirectX 12 test tells a similar story at 73 vs 66, a 10.6% advantage for the RTX 4060 Mobile, while DirectX 11 (157 vs 150) and DirectX 10 (107 vs 103) produce smaller but consistent victories of 4.7% and 3.9% respectively. These results indicate the Ada Lovelace architecture's driver maturity and shading-unit count translate into better raw API-level performance across the board.

In the broader 3D gaming metric, the Passmark G3D score shows the RTX 4060 Mobile edging out the RTX 5050 by a razor-thin 0.8% (17,469 vs 17,326). The Vulkan test follows the same pattern, with the RTX 4060 Mobile winning 89,569 to 89,381 — a 0.2% margin that is nearly negligible in practice. These two results establish the RTX 4060 Mobile as the nominal gaming-performance leader, but the margins are so small that real-world differences would likely be imperceptible.

The RTX 5050's strongest counterargument comes in the Passmark GPU Compute test, where it scores 9,184 against the RTX 4060 Mobile's 6,816 — a massive 25.8% advantage that highlights the Blackwell architecture's computational efficiency. The 2D graphics test shows an even larger relative gap in the other direction: the RTX 5050 scores 1,113 vs 730, a 34.4% lead that reflects its higher memory clock and faster effective bandwidth. The Geekbench OpenCL result also favors the RTX 5050, albeit narrowly, at 90,334 vs 89,420, a 1% difference.

Notably, the RTX 5050's wins are concentrated in tests that stress raw throughput and compute, while the RTX 4060 Mobile wins all five Passmark DirectX tests plus Vulkan and G3D. This split suggests the RTX 4060 Mobile's 3,072 shading units (versus 2,560 on the RTX 5050) provide an advantage in traditional rasterization, while the RTX 5050's higher clock speeds (2,572 MHz boost vs 1,890 MHz) drive its compute performance.

The Verdict

The data supports the RTX 4060 Mobile for gamers prioritizing DirectX compatibility and legacy titles. It wins every DirectX test from 9 through 12, with margins ranging from 3.9% to 16.1%, and it holds the overall G3D lead at 17,469 vs 17,326. The 67th percentile ranking versus the RTX 5050's 66th percentile reinforces this positioning, as does the average benchmark score of 22,729 compared to 21,035.

The RTX 5050 is the pick for compute-focused users and those who prioritize raw throughput. Its 25.8% GPU Compute lead (9,184 vs 6,816) is the single largest performance gap in the entire comparison, and the 34.4% 2D graphics advantage (1,113 vs 730) indicates better memory subsystem efficiency. The RTX 5050's newer Blackwell 2.0 architecture, PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth (versus 256.0 GB/s on the RTX 4060 Mobile) make it the more future-proof option despite losing the overall benchmark count.

For balanced users, the choice comes down to workload distribution. The RTX 4060 Mobile offers better DirectX performance across the board, while the RTX 5050 delivers superior compute and 2D performance. The RTX 5050's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 output exceeds the RTX 4060 Mobile's 11.61 TFLOPS, but the RTX 4060 Mobile counters with more RT cores (24 vs 20), more TMUs (96 vs 80), and more ROPs (48 vs 32). Neither card offers a compelling reason to switch if the other fits the primary use case.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile wins six of nine benchmarks, including all five Passmark DirectX tests (9, 10, 11, and 12), the Vulkan test, and the Passmark G3D test. The RTX 5050 wins the remaining three: Geekbench OpenCL, Passmark G2D, and Passmark GPU Compute.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two cards?

A: The biggest difference is in the Passmark G2D test, where the RTX 5050 leads by 34.4% (1,113 vs 730). The second-largest gap is the Passmark GPU Compute test, where the RTX 5050 leads by 25.8% (9,184 vs 6,816). The RTX 4060 Mobile's largest win is 16.1% in Passmark DirectX 9 (216 vs 186).

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729, while the RTX 5050 averages 21,035. This represents a 7.5% difference in favor of the RTX 4060 Mobile. The nearest rival for the RTX 4060 Mobile is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22,895 (-0.7%), while the RTX 5050's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21,153 (-0.6%).

Q: Which card performs better in DirectX 12?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile wins the Passmark DirectX 12 test with a score of 73 versus 66 for the RTX 5050, a 10.6% advantage. This is the RTX 4060 Mobile's second-largest benchmark win after DirectX 9.

Q: Is the RTX 5050 better for compute workloads?

A: Yes, the data shows a significant compute advantage. The RTX 5050 scores 9,184 in Passmark GPU Compute versus 6,816 for the RTX 4060 Mobile, a 25.8% lead. It also wins the Geekbench OpenCL test 90,334 to 89,420, though by a much narrower 1% margin.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile ranks at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5050 ranks at the 66th percentile. This puts both cards in the upper-middle tier of the overall GPU performance distribution.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4060 Mobile and RTX 5050 differ in nearly every compute specification, though both share the same 8 GB GDDR6 memory configuration and 128-bit bus width. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, while the RTX 5050 uses the GB207 chip with 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. Transistor density favors the RTX 4060 Mobile at 118.9M per mm² versus 113.4M per mm².

Clock speeds substantially favor the RTX 5050: its base clock runs at 2,317 MHz versus 1,545 MHz, and its boost clock hits 2,572 MHz versus 1,890 MHz. Memory clocks also differ, with the RTX 5050 running at 2,500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) versus 2,000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) on the RTX 4060 Mobile. This translates to a bandwidth advantage for the RTX 5050 at 320.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s.

The RTX 4060 Mobile fields more execution resources: 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores, versus the RTX 5050's 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 20 RT cores, and 80 tensor cores. Despite fewer units, the RTX 5050 achieves higher throughput in FP32 (13.17 TFLOPS vs 11.61 TFLOPS) and texture rate (205.8 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s), but the RTX 4060 Mobile wins on pixel rate (90.72 GPixel/s vs 82.30 GPixel/s).

Power and physical specs differ: the RTX 4060 Mobile draws 115 W with an IGP slot width and no power connectors, while the RTX 5050 draws 130 W with a dual-slot design and a single 8-pin connector, plus a 300 W suggested PSU. The bus interface also differs — PCIe 4.0 x8 on the RTX 4060 Mobile versus PCIe 5.0 x8 on the RTX 5050. Display outputs on the RTX 5050 include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's outputs are portable-device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent successive NVIDIA architectures: the RTX 4060 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace (AD107 chip) from the GeForce 40-series, while the RTX 5050 uses Blackwell 2.0 (GB207 chip) from the GeForce 50-series. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the RTX 4060 Mobile's die is larger at 159 mm² versus 149 mm², with more transistors (18,900 million vs 16,900 million). The RTX 4060 Mobile's predecessor is the GeForce 30 Mobile, and its successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile; the RTX 5050's predecessor is GeForce 40, with GeForce 60 as its successor.

The RTX 4060 Mobile has a 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores configuration, while the RTX 5050 reduces both to 20 and 80 respectively. However, the RTX 5050's higher boost clock (2,572 MHz vs 1,890 MHz) and faster memory (20 Gbps effective vs 16 Gbps) partially compensate for the reduced core counts. The RTX 5050 also supports PCIe 5.0 x8, doubling the interconnect bandwidth of the RTX 4060 Mobile's PCIe 4.0 x8.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature parity is identical. The RTX 5050's release date of June 30, 2025 positions it as a newer product than the RTX 4060 Mobile's January 2, 2023 launch. The RTX 5050's launch MSRP is 249 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins for gamers running DirectX-based titles, particularly older games. Its DirectX 9 score of 216 versus 186 represents a 16.1% advantage, and the DirectX 12 lead of 10.6% (73 vs 66) suggests better compatibility with modern game APIs as well. The overall Passmark G3D win (17,469 vs 17,326) and Vulkan win (89,569 vs 89,381) reinforce the RTX 4060 Mobile as the general-purpose gaming choice. Its 48 ROPs versus 32 on the RTX 5050 likely contribute to the higher pixel rate (90.72 GPixel/s vs 82.30 GPixel/s), which benefits fill-rate-heavy scenes.

The RTX 5050 wins for compute-intensive tasks and 2D desktop workloads. The 25.8% GPU Compute advantage (9,184 vs 6,816) makes it the clear choice for GPU-accelerated compute, and the 34.4% G2D lead (1,113 vs 730) indicates stronger 2D graphics performance for productivity. The higher FP32 throughput (13.17 TFLOPS vs 11.61 TFLOPS) and faster memory bandwidth (320.0 GB/s vs 256.0 GB/s) support these wins. The RTX 5050's dual-slot design with a dedicated power connector also makes it suitable for desktop builds, whereas the RTX 4060 Mobile's IGP form factor targets laptops.

Users needing the latest connectivity should favor the RTX 5050 for its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. Users constrained by power should favor the RTX 4060 Mobile at 115 W versus 130 W. The RTX 5050's higher base and boost clocks suggest it will scale better in thermally favorable environments, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's greater core counts provide a safety margin in driver-bound workloads. Ultimately, the RTX 4060 Mobile wins on gaming breadth and DirectX legacy support, while the RTX 5050 wins on compute throughput, 2D performance, and modern platform features.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4060 Mobile
RTX 5050
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,072
2,560 -16.7%
Shaders
3,072
2,560 -16.7%
TMUs
96
80 -16.7%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
24
20 -16.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1545 MHz
2317 MHz
Boost Clock
1890 MHz
2572 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
320.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
32 MB
24 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
90.72 GPixel/s
82.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
181.4 GTexel/s
205.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS
13.17 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
181.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
205.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS (1:1)
13.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
24
20 -16.7%
Tensor Cores
96
80 -16.7%
Power
TDP
115 W
130 W
TDP (W)
115
130 +13.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
AD107
GB207
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
GeForce 50
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
16,900 million
Die Size
159 mm²
149 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
118.9M / mm²
113.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
249 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
GeForce 60
View GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 5050 Details