NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries, resulting in zero wins for each side in the head-to-head comparison. For the RTX 4050 Mobile, the data shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 75,235, indicating strong compute performance in both API environments. Passmark results further characterize the mobile GPU: DirectX 10 scores 79, DirectX 11 scores 130, DirectX 12 scores 61, DirectX 9 scores 184, G2D scores 633, G3D scores 14,423, and GPU compute scores 5,947. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 19,049, placing the RTX 4050 Mobile at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals to the RTX 4050 Mobile, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with an average score of 19,036, a delta of 0.1% relative to the RTX 4050 Mobile. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19,030, also 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla K20m posts 19,089, which is 0.2% ahead of the RTX 4050 Mobile. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18,954, sitting 0.5% behind. These narrow deltas place the RTX 4050 Mobile in a tightly contested performance cluster where differences are minimal.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark data, no direct score comparisons can be made between the two products. The LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 and holds the 50th percentile rank, which reflects the absence of recorded measurements rather than actual performance. The database indicates zero wins for each side in the head-to-head category, meaning no test results exist to establish which product outperforms the other.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the only product with measurable benchmark performance. Its average score of 19,049 and 63rd percentile ranking demonstrate that it delivers competitive results within its class, as evidenced by the near-identical scores of its nearest rivals. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be evaluated on the same basis. The data shows no performance advantage for the LX PRO because no measurements exist to support such a claim.

For users selecting between these two based strictly on database evidence, the RTX 4050 Mobile offers verifiable performance metrics across multiple tests, including compute workloads and graphics APIs. The LX PRO provides no recorded scores, so any performance assessment would lack empirical backing. The RTX 4050 Mobile also appears in a well-defined competitive context with four nearest rivals, all within 0.5% of its average score, which situates it in a balanced performance band. The LX PRO has no rival comparisons in the database, leaving its standing undefined.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 4050 Mobile has substantiated performance, while the LX PRO does not. The 50th percentile for the LX PRO reflects a default position, not a measured outcome.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses the AD107 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a die size of 159 mm², yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX PRO employs the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process node. The LX PRO transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no transistor density figure is recorded.

The RTX 4050 Mobile features 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 20 ray tracing cores, and 80 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but ray tracing core and tensor core counts are not listed in the database. The LX PRO therefore offers a substantially larger shader and texture configuration on paper, while the RTX 4050 Mobile includes dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware that the LX PRO does not document.

In terms of API support, the RTX 4050 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but its Vulkan support is version 1.3, one revision behind the RTX 4050 Mobile. The production status for both is Active, with the RTX 4050 Mobile released on January 2, 2023, and the LX PRO dated March 16, 2026.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4050 Mobile and LX PRO differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, while the LX PRO has no base or boost clock entries. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 4050 Mobile runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the LX PRO operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration varies significantly. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is more than double the capacity and bandwidth of the RTX 4050 Mobile.

Compute rates follow the same pattern. The RTX 4050 Mobile achieves a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 8.986 TFLOPS. The LX PRO reaches 192.0 GPixel/s, 384.0 GTexel/s, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4050 Mobile lists FP16 at 8.986 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot width, a single 16-pin power connector, a suggested PSU of 550 W, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The RTX 4050 Mobile has display outputs described as portable device dependent, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width; the RTX 4050 Mobile has no recorded dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19,049, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average score of 0 due to having no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile sits within 0.5% of four rivals: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (0.1% behind), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0.1% behind), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (0.2% ahead), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (0.5% behind).

Q: What is the memory difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, compared to 8.986 TFLOPS for the RTX 4050 Mobile, based on recorded specifications.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W with no power connectors, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W with one 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 4050 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile wins in every measurable benchmark category because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores. The RTX 4050 Mobile shows verified performance in Geekbench OpenCL at 74,748 and Geekbench Vulkan at 75,235, which supports its use in compute-oriented workloads. Passmark results indicate strengths in specific areas: the DirectX 9 score of 184 and G3D score of 14,423 are the highest among its Passmark entries, while the GPU compute score of 5,947 shows capable parallel processing. The 63rd percentile ranking places it above the median GPU, and its average score of 19,049 aligns closely with desktop-class rivals like the Radeon RX 6600.

The LX PRO, lacking benchmarks, cannot claim any measured wins. However, its specification sheet suggests potential advantages in raw compute resources: 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 indicate a design aimed at higher throughput. The 24 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth could benefit workloads with large datasets, and the 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests strong fill-rate capabilities. The dual-slot design with a 16-pin power connector and 225 W TDP implies a desktop-oriented card, whereas the RTX 4050 Mobile targets portable devices with its IGP form factor and 50 W TDP.

The RTX 4050 Mobile wins on portability and efficiency, with its 50 W TDP and no power connectors suiting thin-and-light systems. The LX PRO wins on paper for memory capacity, bandwidth, and raw compute rates, but these advantages remain unverified in the database. The RTX 4050 Mobile also offers ray tracing cores and tensor cores, features the LX PRO does not list, which may matter for applications that use those dedicated units. Ultimately, the RTX 4050 Mobile prevails in all recorded performance tests, while the LX PRO presents a specification-driven case that awaits benchmark confirmation.