GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
74,748
52,078
geekbench_vulkan
75,235
49,574
passmark_directx_10
79
N/A
passmark_directx_11
130
N/A
passmark_directx_12
61
N/A
passmark_directx_9
184
N/A
passmark_g2d
633
N/A
passmark_g3d
14,423
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,947
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
969

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

Rendering performance tests between the RTX 4050 and GeForce NVIDIA RTX A1000 demonstrate a clear victor. the RTX 4050 provides notably higher performance over current AAA releases. This memory edge and design advances translate into obviously enhanced gameplay experiences. Benchmark figures supports this conclusion. Gamers seeking high-end graphics might pay attention.

GeForce NVIDIA RTX A1000 encounters issues to rival the RTX 4050's sheer power. For cost-sensitive users, GeForce NVIDIA RTX A1000 may nonetheless deliver acceptable capability, however users demanding top-tier quality would look toward the RTX 4050. This frame rate delta is sufficiently substantial to deny. Demanding titles particularly reveal this difference. This price gap pays rewards in frame rates.

The video memory edge of the RTX 4050 turns particularly important at elevated quality levels. Demanding workloads needs considerable VRAM, and the RTX 4050 delivers more headroom. This leads into smoother experiences in demanding scenarios. Modern releases might continually demand more video memory. The benefit expands over time.

All things considered, the RTX 4050 delivers the more capable selection in this evaluation. The benchmark advantages validate attention for users putting together a high-performance rendering PC. While GeForce NVIDIA RTX A1000 possesses its strengths, the test results definitely favors the RTX 4050. Reach your selection considering this. This performance gap is considerable enough to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4050 Mobile
RTX A1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
2,304 -10.0%
Shaders
2,560
2,304 -10.0%
TMUs
80
72 -10.0%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
20
18 -10.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1455 MHz
727 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1462 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
8,192 +33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
46.78 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
20
18 -10.0%
Tensor Cores
80
72 -10.0%
Power
TDP
50 W
50 W
TDP (W)
50
50 0.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA107
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Workstation Ada
View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details View RTX A1000 Details