NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Comparison

NVIDIA’s RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects that chasm. In the single shared 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408, while the RTX 3060 Ti manages 2,626. That is a 524.8% delta, meaning the workstation card delivers over six times the frame throughput in this workload. The RTX 3060 Ti’s own average benchmark score across all tests sits at 16,129, which is actually lower than the RTX PRO 6000’s single-test result. However, the RTX 3060 Ti’s percentile rank among all GPUs is 59, identical to the RTX PRO 6000’s 59th percentile, showing that raw score isn’t everything—the older card still holds its own against a broad field.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and it is a landslide. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell posts 16,408 points against the RTX 3060 Ti’s 2,626, a 524.8% advantage. For context, the RTX PRO 6000’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (a 0% delta), meaning the Blackwell card is essentially tied with that professional GPU. The RTX 3060 Ti, meanwhile, sits within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and 1.7% above the AMD Radeon R9 370X, per its nearestRivals data. This suggests the 3060 Ti is competitive with mid-range cards from several generations, while the RTX PRO 6000 is in a league of its own.

Widening the lens, the RTX 3060 Ti has ten benchmark scores in the database, including Geekbench OpenCL at 78,927 and Vulkan at 47,784. Its Passmark G3D score is 20,349, and GPU compute hits 10,006. None of these tests are run on the RTX PRO 6000, so a direct cross-test comparison isn’t possible. What the data does show is that the RTX 3060 Ti’s average across all benchmarks is 16,129, which is 279 points below the RTX PRO 6000’s single Steel Nomad result. Even if the 3060 Ti’s best-case score (Passmark G3D at 20,349) were compared, it still trails the RTX PRO 6000’s 16,408 in Steel Nomad by roughly 19%. The verdict is unambiguous: in any compute-heavy or DX12 workload, the RTX PRO 6000 obliterates the 3060 Ti.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different foundations. The RTX PRO 6000 uses the GB202 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It packs 92,200 million transistors into a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². In contrast, the RTX 3060 Ti uses the GA104 chip on Ampere, built by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a density of 44.4 million per mm². The Blackwell chip has over five times the transistor count and nearly double the die area, which explains the massive performance gap.

Memory is another stark divider. The RTX PRO 6000 features 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s. That’s a 4x difference in capacity and a 4x difference in bandwidth. Shader resources follow suit: the RTX PRO 6000 has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, versus the 3060 Ti’s 4,864 shading units, 152 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Blackwell card also features 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, while the 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores—again, a 5x gap.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The RTX PRO 6000 boosts to 2,617 MHz from a 1,590 MHz base, while the 3060 Ti boosts to 1,665 MHz from 1,410 MHz. The Blackwell card runs faster despite its size, thanks to the smaller process node. FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 6000, versus 16.20 TFLOPS for the 3060 Ti—a 7.8x difference. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. Power requirements differ enormously: the RTX PRO 6000 draws 600 W and needs a 1000 W PSU, while the 3060 Ti consumes 200 W and runs on a 550 W PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell offers 1.79 TB/s over a 512-bit bus with GDDR7, while the RTX 3060 Ti provides 448.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus with GDDR6. The Blackwell card has exactly 4x the bandwidth.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has an Active production status, released on 2025-03-17. The RTX 3060 Ti is End-of-life, released on 2020-11-30, with its successor listed as GeForce 40.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 achieves 122.9 million transistors per mm² on TSMC’s 5 nm node, while the RTX 3060 Ti reaches 44.4 million per mm² on Samsung’s 8 nm node. That’s nearly a 3x density advantage for Blackwell.

Q: How do their benchmark averages compare?

A: The RTX PRO 6000’s average benchmark score is 16,408 (from one test). The RTX 3060 Ti’s average across ten tests is 16,129. The RTX PRO 6000 leads by 279 points, but its best individual test (Steel Nomad) beats the 3060 Ti’s best (Passmark G3D at 20,349) by 19%.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 has 24,064 shading units, compared to 4,864 on the RTX 3060 Ti. The Blackwell GPU also has 752 TMUs and 192 ROPs versus 152 TMUs and 80 ROPs on Ampere.

Q: Do they use the same power connector?

A: No. The RTX PRO 6000 uses a single 16-pin connector, while the RTX 3060 Ti uses a single 12-pin connector. The suggested PSU is 1000 W for the former and 550 W for the latter.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a professional compute monster, while the RTX 3060 Ti is a capable mid-range consumer GPU from a previous generation. In the only shared benchmark, the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 524.8%, which is not a marginal improvement but a generational leap. If your workload demands 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, or 126.0 TFLOPS of FP32, the RTX 3060 Ti cannot even approach those figures—it has 8 GB, 448.0 GB/s, and 16.20 TFLOPS, respectively. The RTX PRO 6000 also carries a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD, versus the 3060 Ti’s 399 USD, but you are paying for a 5x transistor count and a 7.8x compute throughput.

For anyone building a workstation for AI, rendering, or large-scale simulations, the RTX PRO 6000 is the only choice here. Its 752 tensor cores and 188 RT cores dwarf the 3060 Ti’s 152 and 38, respectively. Conversely, the RTX 3060 Ti is a solid pick for budget gaming or light productivity, but it is end-of-life and its 59th percentile rank matches the RTX PRO 6000 only because the latter’s score is based on a single test. The 3060 Ti’s real-world versatility comes from its ten benchmark results, but none of them approach the Blackwell card’s peak performance. Pick the RTX PRO 6000 for absolute performance; pick the RTX 3060 Ti only if the workload fits within its 8 GB memory and 200 W power envelope.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measured specification. The RTX PRO 6000 uses a GB202 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 3060 Ti uses GA104 on Ampere. Process nodes are 5 nm (TSMC) versus 8 nm (Samsung). Transistor counts are 92,200 million versus 17,400 million, and die sizes are 750 mm² versus 392 mm². Base clocks are 1,590 MHz versus 1,410 MHz, and boost clocks are 2,617 MHz versus 1,665 MHz. Memory is 96 GB GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus versus 8 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. Bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s versus 448.0 GB/s. Shading units number 24,064 versus 4,864; TMUs are 752 versus 152; ROPs are 192 versus 80; RT cores are 188 versus 38; tensor cores are 752 versus 152. Pixel rates are 502.5 GPixel/s versus 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 are both 126.0 TFLOPS on the RTX PRO 6000, versus 16.20 TFLOPS on the 3060 Ti. TDP is 600 W versus 200 W. Power connectors are 1x 16-pin versus 1x 12-pin, and suggested PSUs are 1000 W versus 550 W. Bus interfaces are PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions are 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm versus 242 mm x 112 mm (width not specified). Release dates are 2025-03-17 versus 2020-11-30, and production statuses are Active versus End-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 6000 wins in every scenario that demands massive memory or compute throughput. Its 96 GB of GDDR7 at 1.79 TB/s is ideal for loading large datasets, training neural networks, or rendering 8K scenes without swapping. The 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 rate makes it a top-tier choice for scientific computing, and the 752 tensor cores accelerate AI inference. Its 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support high-resolution multi-monitor setups for visualization work. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it wins outright by 524.8%, and its nearest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at a 0% delta—meaning it trades blows with other professional cards, not consumer GPUs.

The RTX 3060 Ti wins in efficiency and accessibility. Its 200 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement make it far easier to integrate into an existing system, whereas the RTX PRO 6000 needs 600 W and a 1000 W PSU. The 3060 Ti’s 8 GB memory is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and its 16.20 TFLOPS is respectable for its class. Its ten benchmark results, including a 20,349 Passmark G3D score and a 78,927 Geekbench OpenCL score, show balanced performance across DX9 through DX12 and compute workloads. It also supports HDMI 2.1, which the RTX PRO 6000 lacks entirely—so for home theater PCs or VR headsets using HDMI, the 3060 Ti is the only option. The 3060 Ti’s nearest rivals are consumer cards like the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% delta), placing it in a familiar performance bracket for mid-range gaming. Neither card is a jack-of-all-trades; the RTX PRO 6000 is a specialist tool for serious compute, and the RTX 3060 Ti is a generalist for everyday use.