NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 575 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,821
16,504
geekbench_opencl
79,483
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
80,344
N/A
passmark_directx_10
90
N/A
passmark_directx_11
110
N/A
passmark_directx_12
58
N/A
passmark_directx_9
146
N/A
passmark_g2d
588
N/A
passmark_g3d
13,230
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,718
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 represent two very different moments in NVIDIA’s laptop and desktop GPU history. The former is an Ampere-based mobile part from early 2021, built for thin-and-light gaming notebooks. The latter is a Blackwell 2.0 desktop monster released in mid-2025, designed for extreme performance in a full-size tower. The database contains one shared benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and the results are stark. The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 points, while the RTX 3060 Mobile scores 1,821 points, a difference of 89% in favor of the newer card. This single metric, combined with their respective architectural specifications, tells a clear story about generational leaps, power requirements, and intended use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This is a modern, DirectX 12 Ultimate workload that stresses ray tracing, mesh shading, and asynchronous compute. In this test, the RTX 5090 D V2 delivers 16,504 points. The RTX 3060 Mobile manages 1,821 points. That is a delta of negative 89% for the mobile card, meaning the desktop GPU is roughly nine times faster in raw score. No other benchmark overlaps exist in the recorded data, so any further head-to-head analysis must rely on the individual benchmark suites for each card.

Looking at the RTX 3060 Mobile’s broader benchmark profile, it shows a mixed bag of results across different APIs. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 80,344, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 79,483. These numbers are close, suggesting balanced compute performance across vendor-neutral APIs. In Passmark, the card scores 13,230 in G3D, but much lower in specific DirectX tests: 146 in DirectX 9, 110 in DirectX 11, 90 in DirectX 10, and only 58 in DirectX 12. The DirectX 12 result is notably weak, which aligns with its poor Steel Nomad showing. Meanwhile, Passmark GPU Compute gives 5,718, and G2D gives 588. The average benchmark score for the RTX 3060 Mobile is 18,159, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The RTX 5090 D V2, by contrast, has only the Steel Nomad result recorded, but that single score of 16,504 places it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 16,504 as well, since it is the only entry. The nearest rivals for the RTX 3060 Mobile include the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at an average score of 18,189, which is 0.2% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER at 18,093, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 460 and Intel Arc A770M both sit around 18,373 and 18,383 respectively, about 1.2% higher. This indicates that the RTX 3060 Mobile, despite its age and mobile power envelope, performs within a few percentage points of several desktop and high-end mobile parts from the same era.

For the RTX 5090 D V2, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5% higher), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 (0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (0.9% higher). These deltas are tiny, meaning the RTX 5090 D V2’s Steel Nomad score is essentially tied with a range of professional and older gaming cards. This is surprising given its massive architectural specifications, but it suggests that Steel Nomad may not be the ideal workload for this particular GPU, or that the benchmark is sensitive to driver optimizations and specific hardware features.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 5090 D V2 is the superior performer in the shared benchmark, by a massive margin. Anyone looking for maximum raw performance in a desktop system should choose the RTX 5090 D V2. Its 16,504 Steel Nomad score is orders of magnitude ahead of the RTX 3060 Mobile’s 1,821. The RTX 5090 D V2 also comes with a 24 GB GDDR7 memory pool, a 384-bit bus, and 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, which are far beyond the 6 GB GDDR6 and 336 GB/s of the mobile card.

However, the RTX 3060 Mobile has its place. It is an end-of-life product, but it was designed for laptops where power consumption is critical. Its 80 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5090 D V2’s 575 W. It requires no external power connectors, while the desktop card needs a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 950 W power supply. The mobile card is also portable and the display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning it is meant to drive a laptop screen. The RTX 5090 D V2, by contrast, is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs and one HDMI 2.1b output.

The verdict from the recorded data is simple: choose the RTX 5090 D V2 for desktop performance and modern features, and choose the RTX 3060 Mobile only if the use case is a legacy laptop where the 80 W power draw and 6 GB memory are sufficient. The RTX 5090 D V2 is active in production, while the RTX 3060 Mobile is end-of-life, so future driver support will favor the newer card.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is enormous. The RTX 3060 Mobile uses the GA106 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process node. The die size is 276 mm², with 12,000 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The RTX 5090 D V2 uses the GB202 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die is 750 mm², containing 92,200 million transistors, for a density of 122.9 million per mm². That is roughly 7.7 times more transistors on a die that is 2.7 times larger, and a process node that is significantly more advanced.

The core configuration follows the transistor budget. The RTX 3060 Mobile has 3,840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, 48 render output units, 30 ray tracing cores, and 120 tensor cores. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. This is a 5.7x increase in shading units, a 5.7x increase in TMUs, a 3.7x increase in ROPs, a 5.7x increase in RT cores, and a 5.7x increase in tensor cores. The raw compute figures reflect this: the RTX 3060 Mobile delivers 10.94 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, while the RTX 5090 D V2 delivers 104.8 TFLOPS in both, a 9.6x difference.

Memory architecture also differs fundamentally. The RTX 3060 Mobile uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 336 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D V2 uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.34 TB/s. The memory clock is recorded as 1750 MHz for both, but the effective data rate is 14 Gbps for the mobile card and 28 Gbps for the desktop card. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 171.0 GTexel/s versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s. These are massive differences in fillrate capabilities.

The bus interface also differs: the RTX 3060 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5090 D V2 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 3060 Mobile’s architecture is Ampere, which was introduced with the GeForce 30-series, while the RTX 5090 D V2 is Blackwell 2.0, part of the GeForce 50-series. The predecessor of the RTX 3060 Mobile is the GeForce 20 Mobile, and the predecessor of the RTX 5090 D V2 is the GeForce 40. The RTX 5090 D V2’s successor is listed as GeForce 60, while the RTX 3060 Mobile has no successor recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the shared benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the RTX 3060 Mobile scores 1,821 points. The RTX 5090 D V2 wins by 89%.

Q: What is the memory capacity of each card?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP levels?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has a TDP of 80 W, while the RTX 5090 D V2 has a TDP of 575 W. The desktop card requires a 950 W suggested power supply and a single 16-pin power connector, while the mobile card has no power connectors.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 170 RT cores, compared to the RTX 3060 Mobile’s 30 RT cores. The desktop card also has 680 tensor cores versus 120 on the mobile card.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 18,159 across all its recorded tests, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The RTX 5090 D V2 has an average score of 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile.

Q: What is the release date and production status?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile was released on 2021-01-11 and is end-of-life. The RTX 5090 D V2 was released on 2025-08-14 and is active in production. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 D V2 wins in every measurable performance category from the database. It has higher FP32 and FP16 compute, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more RT cores, more tensor cores, higher pixel rate, higher texture rate, more memory, faster memory, and a wider bus. It wins the only head-to-head benchmark by 89%. It is the clear choice for any desktop workstation, high-refresh-rate gaming at high resolutions, or professional rendering task where the 24 GB memory pool is beneficial.

The RTX 3060 Mobile wins in power efficiency and portability. Its 80 W TDP is 495 W lower than the RTX 5090 D V2. It requires no power connectors, making it suitable for laptops where the system power supply is limited. Its 6 GB memory is sufficient for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, and its 336 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for that resolution. Its average benchmark score of 18,159 is actually higher than the RTX 5090 D V2’s 16,504, but this is because the mobile card has many more benchmark entries, including lighter tests like Passmark G2D and DirectX 9, which skew the average upward.

The RTX 3060 Mobile also has a smaller die size at 276 mm² versus 750 mm², which is irrelevant for users but relevant for manufacturing yield. It is also an end-of-life product, meaning it may be cheaper on the secondary market, but no pricing data is available in the database. The RTX 5090 D V2 is active, so it will receive ongoing driver support and optimizations.

In terms of use cases, the RTX 5090 D V2 is for a desktop system with a high-wattage power supply, a full-size case, and a need for extreme compute. The RTX 3060 Mobile is for a laptop where battery life and thermals are priorities. The database shows that the RTX 5090 D V2 is the performance king, while the RTX 3060 Mobile is the efficiency champion. Neither card is a direct competitor to the other; they serve completely different segments of the market, and the benchmark data reflects that divide.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 3060 Mobile
RTX 5090 D V2
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,840
21,760 +466.7%
Shaders
3,840
21,760 +466.7%
TMUs
120
680 +466.7%
ROPs
48
176 +266.7%
SM Count
30
170 +466.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
900 MHz
2017 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2407 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
24,576 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
192 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
336.0 GB/s
1.34 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
96 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
68.40 GPixel/s
423.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
171.0 GTexel/s
1,636.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
10.94 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
171.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
30
170 +466.7%
Tensor Cores
120
680 +466.7%
Power
TDP
80 W
575 W
TDP (W)
80
575 +618.8%
Suggested PSU
—
950 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA106
GB202
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
GeForce 50
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
12,000 million
92,200 million
Die Size
276 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
—
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
2,299 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 20 Mobile
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 Details