NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA TITAN V Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and NVIDIA TITAN V represent opposite extremes of NVIDIA's product stack: one is an efficient, integrated-class mobile GPU built for thin-and-light portables, while the other is a dual-slot, high-power desktop behemoth designed for compute and professional workloads. The benchmark data confirms a massive performance gulf, but also reveals surprising architectural similarities—both chips share Tensor Core capabilities, though the TITAN V’s sheer scale leaves the MX570 far behind. The GeForce MX570 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, while the TITAN V ranks at the 79th percentile, meaning that despite the TITAN V’s overwhelming raw power, the MX570’s efficiency-focused design still places it in a comparable overall percentile bracket.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between these two GPUs is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisively one-sided. The NVIDIA TITAN V scores 157,265 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 manages just 38,299 points. This translates to a delta of -75.6% for the MX570, meaning the TITAN V delivers roughly four times the OpenCL compute throughput. That margin is consistent with the underlying hardware: the TITAN V has 5120 shading units versus 2048 on the MX570, and its FP32 throughput of 14.90 TFLOPS dwarfs the MX570’s 4.731 TFLOPS.

The win tally reflects this dominance—the TITAN V wins 1 benchmark, while the MX570 wins 0. However, the percentile data complicates the story. The MX570’s 81st percentile versus the TITAN V’s 79th percentile suggests that, across the full benchmark suite, the MX570 competes in a different league where its efficiency and modern architecture yield proportionally better standing among its peers. The MX570’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, delta -0.1%), the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, delta +0.4%), and the MX570 A (38691, delta -1.0%). This places the MX570 within 1% of some of NVIDIA’s top mobile GPUs, an impressive feat for a 15 W part. In contrast, the TITAN V’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A1000 (34207, delta +0.4%), AMD Radeon HD 7970 (34541, delta -0.5%), RTX A2000 12 GB (34154, delta +0.6%), and T1000 8 GB (34561, delta -0.6%). The TITAN V’s average benchmark score of 34355 is roughly 10% lower than its OpenCL result, suggesting that its performance is not uniformly exceptional across all test types.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is substantial, starting with the manufacturing process. The MX570 uses an 8 nm node from Samsung, while the TITAN V uses a 12 nm node from TSMC. The MX570’s GA107S chip packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The TITAN V’s GV100 chip, by contrast, contains 21,100 million transistors on an 815 mm² die, with a lower density of 25.9 million per square millimeter. This density advantage reflects the MX570’s newer fabrication technology, even though the TITAN V’s massive die gives it far more raw resources.

Memory architecture could not be more different. The MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The TITAN V uses 12 GB of HBM2 memory on a 3072-bit bus, achieving 651.3 GB/s—nearly seven times the bandwidth. The MX570’s memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective), while the TITAN V’s is 848 MHz (1696 Mbps effective). The TITAN V’s HBM2 implementation trades clock speed for an extraordinarily wide bus, enabling far greater memory throughput for compute-heavy workloads.

Compute resources are similarly lopsided. The MX570 has 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, while the TITAN V has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The TITAN V also has 640 Tensor Cores, compared to 64 on the MX570—a 10x difference. Interestingly, the MX570 includes 16 RT cores, while the TITAN V has none, reflecting the MX570’s newer Ampere architecture with DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The TITAN V’s Volta architecture only supports DirectX 12 (12_1), whereas the MX570 supports 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, giving them parity on modern API fronts except for ray tracing.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance in OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN V scores 157,265 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 75.6% higher than the MX570’s 38,299. The TITAN V’s FP32 throughput of 14.90 TFLOPS versus 4.731 TFLOPS on the MX570 explains this gap.

Q: Does the MX570 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the MX570 includes 16 RT cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The TITAN V has no RT cores, so it lacks this feature entirely.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The TITAN V has 12 GB of HBM2 on a 3072-bit bus with 651.3 GB/s bandwidth, offering nearly seven times the memory bandwidth and six times the capacity.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?

A: The MX570 has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, while the TITAN V has a TDP of 250 W and needs a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connection. The MX570 is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) design, whereas the TITAN V is a dual-slot card.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The MX570 ranks at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, while the TITAN V ranks at the 79th percentile. Despite the TITAN V’s higher absolute performance, the MX570’s efficiency and modern feature set place it higher relative to its peers.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the MX570 outperforms the TITAN V?

A: Based on the available head-to-head data, the MX570 wins 0 benchmarks and the TITAN V wins 1. The only shared test, Geekbench OpenCL, is won decisively by the TITAN V.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA TITAN V |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GA107S | GV100 |

| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |

| Generation | GeForce MX (5xx) | GeForce 10 |

| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | Samsung | TSMC |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 21,100 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 815 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 43.5M / mm² | 25.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 832 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1455 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 848 MHz (1696 Mbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 3072 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 651.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 5120 |

| TMUs | 64 | 320 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 16 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | 640 |

| Pixel Rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 139.7 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | 14.90 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 250 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Dimensions | Not specified | 267 mm (10.5 in) length, 112 mm (4.4 in) height, 40 mm (1.6 in) width |

| Release Date | 2021-12-16 | 2017-12-06 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 2,999 USD |

The Verdict

The data presents a clear choice based on use case. The NVIDIA TITAN V is the undisputed performance king, with 14.90 TFLOPS FP32, 651.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, and a 157,265 OpenCL score that dwarfs the MX570’s 38,299. Its 5120 shading units and 640 Tensor Cores make it a compute powerhouse, and its 12 GB HBM2 memory is essential for large datasets. The TITAN V also boasts a 139.7 GPixel/s pixel rate and 465.6 GTexel/s texture rate, both roughly four to six times the MX570’s figures. For anyone needing maximum FP32 or FP16 throughput—the TITAN V reaches 29.80 TFLOPS FP16—this GPU is the obvious choice, provided the 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU are acceptable.

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570, however, is not without merit. Its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor mean it can be integrated into ultraportable devices without discrete power connectors. Despite its modest specs, it holds an 81st percentile ranking—higher than the TITAN V’s 79th—and its nearest rivals include the RTX 5080 Mobile and RTX 4080 Mobile, indicating strong relative performance among mobile GPUs. The MX570 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and includes 16 RT cores, features the TITAN V lacks. Its 8 nm process yields a transistor density of 43.5M / mm², far higher than the TITAN V’s 25.9M / mm², showcasing the efficiency of newer fabrication.

The verdict hinges on priorities. For compute-intensive workloads, large memory footprints, and maximum throughput, the TITAN V wins outright—its 75.6% OpenCL lead is insurmountable. For energy-conscious mobile systems where ray tracing, modern API support, and efficiency matter more than raw performance, the MX570 is the appropriate choice. The TITAN V’s 2,999 USD launch MSRP reflects its professional-grade positioning, while the MX570’s lack of a listed MSRP underscores its role as an OEM component. Neither GPU is a substitute for the other; they serve entirely different segments of the market, and the benchmark data reinforces that division.