NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA’s GeForce MX570 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile occupy opposite ends of the mobile GPU spectrum, yet the benchmark data reveals a surprisingly narrow gap in overall percentile ranking. The MX570, an end-of-life Ampere part from late 2021, posts a single OpenCL score of 38,299, while the newer Blackwell-based RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, released in early 2025, delivers a dominant 143,870 in the same test. Despite that massive performance delta, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s average benchmark score of 35,435 places it at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, only one point below the MX570’s 81st percentile. This oddity stems from the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s mixed benchmark results, which include low DirectX scores that drag down its average. The data paints a clear picture: raw compute leadership belongs to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, but the MX570 holds its own in percentile standing due to a narrower test profile.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in the only shared benchmark?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 versus the MX570’s 38,299, a delta of -73.4% from the winner’s perspective. That translates to roughly 3.76 times higher raw compute performance.

Q: Which GPU has the better overall percentile ranking?

A: The MX570 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile ranks at the 80th percentile. Despite the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s far higher peak score, its broader benchmark suite includes weak DirectX results that bring its average down to 35,435, slightly below the MX570’s 38,299.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each GPU according to the data?

A: The MX570’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, with a delta of -0.1%, followed by the RTX 4080 Mobile at +0.4%. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s closest competitor is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at -0.2%, with the AMD Radeon Pro Duo trailing at -1.2%.

Q: Which GPU supports more modern APIs?

A: Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API feature sets are identical, so software compatibility does not differentiate them.

Q: How do memory specifications compare?

A: The MX570 offers 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile provides 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, a seven-fold increase in capacity and a 7x boost in bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient based on the data?

A: The MX570 has a TDP of 15 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile draws 60 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers roughly 3.76x the OpenCL performance at 4x the power draw, indicating similar efficiency per watt in that specific test.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural generations. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip built on Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile employs the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm node, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die. The transistor density tells the story of process advancement: the MX570 achieves 43.5M transistors per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile reaches 118.3M per mm².

Core configurations diverge sharply. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scales up to 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s RT core count is nearly three times higher, and its tensor core count is 2.875x higher, which matters for ray tracing and AI workloads. Clock speeds also differ: the MX570 boosts to 1155 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile boosts to 1447 MHz.

Memory architecture separates them further. The MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit interface, yielding 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile ships with 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s. That is a 7x increase in both capacity and bandwidth. The memory clock also jumps from 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) to 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the MX570 versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

The process node and foundry differences are fundamental. Samsung’s 8 nm node for the MX570 is an older, less dense process compared to TSMC’s 5 nm node for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The production status reflects this: the MX570 is end-of-life, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is active. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s predecessor is listed as GeForce 40 Mobile, whereas the MX570 has no predecessor or successor in the data.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a straightforward choice for different use cases. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear performance leader in raw compute, posting a Geekbench OpenCL score of 143,870 versus the MX570’s 38,299. That 73.4% delta in the winner’s favor means the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile handles compute-heavy tasks at nearly four times the speed. Its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity and throughput for modern workloads, compared to the MX570’s 2 GB GDDR6 with 96.00 GB/s.

However, the MX570 is not without merit. It holds a higher percentile ranking at 81 versus 80, and its average benchmark score of 38,299 exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s average of 35,435. The MX570’s 15 W TDP makes it suitable for ultra-low-power devices, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 60 W TDP requires more robust cooling and battery capacity. For users prioritizing raw performance, modern architecture, and future-proofing, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only rational pick. For users constrained by power budgets or needing a simple, end-of-life part for basic tasks, the MX570 remains viable, but the data offers no scenario where it outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in compute.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s mixed benchmark results warrant caution. Its PassMark DirectX scores are low—151 in DX10, 237 in DX11, 102 in DX12, and 259 in DX9—while its G3D score hits 24,004 and GPU compute reaches 10,101. These low DirectX numbers drag its average down, yet its OpenCL and Vulkan scores (139,213) suggest strong compute and modern API performance. The MX570, with only a single OpenCL benchmark, lacks comparable data for gaming or legacy API workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Samsung | TSMC |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 43.5M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 832 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 64 | 184 |

| ROPs | 32 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.731 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 60 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-12-16 | 2025-02-28 |

The two GPUs share identical API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), slot width (IGP), power connectors (None), and display outputs (Portable Device Dependent). No launch MSRP is available for either product.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, tells a lopsided story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870, while the MX570 manages 38,299. The deltaPct of -73.4% is measured from the winner’s side, meaning the MX570 trails by that margin. In absolute terms, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 105,571 points ahead, a 3.76x multiplier. This is the only head-to-head data point, and it decisively favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s additional benchmarks provide context. Its Vulkan score of 139,213 closely matches its OpenCL result, suggesting consistent performance across modern compute APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 24,004 and GPU compute score of 10,101 indicate strong overall graphics capability. However, its DirectX scores—151 in DX10, 237 in DX11, 102 in DX12, and 259 in DX9—are anomalously low compared to its other metrics. These low scores may reflect driver or workload characteristics rather than raw hardware capability, but they significantly impact the average benchmark score of 35,435.

The MX570 has no comparable DirectX or Vulkan data, so its 38,299 OpenCL score stands alone. Its nearest rivals in the database—RTX 5080 Mobile at 38,349 and RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135—are within 0.4% of its score, indicating that the MX570 performs in line with older high-end mobile parts in compute. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s nearest rivals—Quadro GV100 at 35,520 and Radeon Pro Duo at 35,860—are all below its average score, but the delta is small, ranging from -0.2% to -2.4%. This suggests that while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads its immediate competition, its average is depressed by the low DirectX numbers.

The wins tally is one for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and zero for the MX570. In the only direct comparison, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively. The MX570’s higher percentile ranking (81 vs 80) reflects its narrower benchmark set rather than actual performance superiority. When all data is considered, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger GPU in every measurable compute metric, with the caveat that its DirectX performance appears weak in the available data.