NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce MX570

CORE STATE GA107S
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1155 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
38,299
212,363
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,604
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
225,122
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one directly comparable benchmark between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 points, while the MX570 scores 38,299 points. This translates to a delta of 454.5% in favor of the RTX 5070 Ti, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti delivers more than five times the compute throughput of the MX570 in this OpenCL workload.

This single result dominates the head-to-head comparison. The RTX 5070 Ti wins the only shared benchmark, so the win tally stands at 1 for the RTX 5070 Ti and 0 for the MX570. The magnitude of the gap is substantial: the MX570's score is roughly 18% of the RTX 5070 Ti's score. Even accounting for the fact that the MX570 is a low-power mobile part and the RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop flagship-class GPU, the performance differential is extreme.

When placed against their respective peer groups, both GPUs sit near their nearest rivals in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49,957 across all tests, which places it 0.1% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (avg score 50,001) and 0.4% above the Intel Arc A550M (avg score 49,737). It also trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2% (avg score 50,951) and leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 3.1% (avg score 48,477). The MX570, with an average benchmark score of 38,299, sits 0.1% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (avg score 38,349) and 0.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (avg score 38,135). It is also 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A (avg score 38,691) and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (avg score 38,706).

The data shows that the RTX 5070 Ti is not merely faster in the head-to-head; it is in a different performance class entirely. The MX570's closest rivals are mobile RTX-class parts, while the RTX 5070 Ti competes with high-end desktop Radeon cards.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measurable category where both GPUs have recorded scores. For compute-heavy tasks, the difference is overwhelming. The RTX 5070 Ti's Geekbench OpenCL score of 212,363 is 454.5% higher than the MX570's 38,299. This makes the RTX 5070 Ti the clear choice for any workload that relies on raw GPU compute, such as rendering, simulation, or machine learning inference.

The MX570, by contrast, has no benchmark wins in the database. Its role is defined not by performance but by power and form factor. With a TDP of 15 W and an integrated form factor (IGP), the MX570 is designed for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermal limits take precedence over raw speed. The RTX 5070 Ti, with a TDP of 300 W and a dual-slot cooler, requires a desktop chassis with a 700 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector. These are fundamentally different product categories.

For users who need maximum frame rates or compute throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only option. For users who need a discrete GPU in a portable device with no external power connectors, the MX570 exists to provide basic acceleration beyond integrated graphics. The database shows no scenario where the MX570 outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti, but its low power draw (15 W vs. 300 W) and compact IGP design make it suitable for laptops where the RTX 5070 Ti cannot physically fit.

The RTX 5070 Ti also has a wider range of benchmark scores available: it has ten recorded tests, including 3DMark Steel Nomad, PassMark DirectX 10/11/12/9, PassMark G2D, PassMark G3D, and PassMark GPU Compute, in addition to Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan. The MX570 has only one recorded test (Geekbench OpenCL). This means the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49,957 is based on a much larger sample, lending more confidence to its ranking at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The MX570's percentile of 81, based on a single test, is less robust.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363, which is 454.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570's 38,299.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49,957. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M, 2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, and 3.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT.

Q: How does the MX570 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The MX570 has an average benchmark score of 38,299. It is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 580X.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti is listed as Active, while the MX570 is listed as End-of-life.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, compared to the MX570's 2,048 shading units.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti and MX570 differ in almost every specification. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip built on an 8 nm process at Samsung, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. Transistor density is 120.6M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti versus 43.5M per mm² for the MX570.

Clock speeds are markedly different. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The MX570 has a base clock of 832 MHz and a boost clock of 1155 MHz, with memory at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the RTX 5070 Ti: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the core count differences. The RTX 5070 Ti achieves 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s, while the MX570 achieves 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 43.94 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti, versus 4.731 TFLOPS for the MX570.

Power and physical specifications are also divergent. The RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W, a dual-slot width, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The MX570 has a TDP of 15 W, an IGP form factor, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 5070 Ti measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width; the MX570 has no recorded dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5070 Ti, versus portable-device-dependent outputs for the MX570. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX 5070 Ti was released on 2025-02-19 and has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. The MX570 was released on 2021-12-16 and has no launch MSRP. The RTX 5070 Ti's predecessor is the GeForce 40 series and its successor is the GeForce 60 series; the MX570 has no recorded predecessor or successor.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between the two GPUs is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series (GeForce 50 generation). The MX570 is built on Ampere architecture, part of the GeForce MX (5xx) generation. This is a difference of two architecture generations, with Blackwell 2.0 being the newer design.

The manufacturing process also differs: the RTX 5070 Ti uses a 5 nm node at TSMC, while the MX570 uses an 8 nm node at Samsung. This contributes to the transistor density gap: 120.6M transistors per mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti versus 43.5M per mm² for the MX570. The RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, whereas the MX570 has 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die.

Core architecture reflects the performance gap. The RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, versus 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores for the MX570. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature support is identical. However, the raw resources for ray tracing and tensor operations are vastly larger on the RTX 5070 Ti.

Memory architecture is another differentiator. The RTX 5070 Ti uses GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, while the MX570 uses GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. The bandwidth difference (896.0 GB/s vs. 96.00 GB/s) is a factor of 9.3x, which directly impacts texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering. The MX570's 2 GB memory capacity is also a limitation for modern workloads, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB capacity supports large datasets and high-resolution textures.

The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the MX570. This affects data transfer rates between the GPU and the host system, though the practical impact depends on the workload. The RTX 5070 Ti's production status is Active, while the MX570 is End-of-life, indicating that NVIDIA has discontinued the older part.

In summary, the RTX 5070 Ti represents a modern, high-end desktop architecture with advanced process technology, massive core counts, and high-bandwidth memory. The MX570 is an older, low-power mobile architecture with modest resources and limited memory bandwidth. The benchmark data confirms that these architecture differences translate into a 454.5% performance advantage for the RTX 5070 Ti in the only shared test.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
MX570
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
8,960 +337.5%
Shaders
2,048
8,960 +337.5%
TMUs
64
280 +337.5%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
SM Count
16
70 +337.5%
Clocks
Base Clock
832 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
2 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
16,384 +700.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
96.00 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
36.96 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
73.92 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
73.92 GFLOPS (1:64)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS (1:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
70 +337.5%
Tensor Cores
64
280 +337.5%
Power
TDP
15 W
300 W
TDP (W)
15
300 +1900.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA107S
GB203
Generation
GeForce MX (5xx)
GeForce 50
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
45,600 million
Die Size
200 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
749 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View GeForce MX570 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details