NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for these two GPUs is decisively one-sided. In the only shared test, Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38,299. That is a delta of 80.8% in favor of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, meaning the desktop card delivers over five times the raw compute throughput in this workload. The MX570 has no recorded wins in any head-to-head comparison; the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds all of them.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also posts results in other tests that the MX570 simply does not appear in. Its Passmark G3D score is 31,811, and its Passmark GPU Compute score is 18,372. In DirectX API tests, it records 360 in DirectX 9, 278 in DirectX 11, 181 in DirectX 10, and 119 in DirectX 12. The MX570, by contrast, has only the single OpenCL entry, so any comparison across those workloads is impossible from the recorded data. What is clear is that in the one test where both are measured, the gap is enormous and consistent with the rest of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's profile.

The percentile rankings tell a similar story but with a nuance. The MX570 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at the 76th. That seems counterintuitive given the raw score gap, but it reflects the distribution of scores: the MX570's 38,299 OpenCL result places it near the top of a pool that includes many weaker mobile and integrated parts, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 199,267 is strong but faces far more competition from high-end desktop cards. The average benchmark score for the MX570 is exactly its OpenCL score, 38,299, because that is its only entry. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average across all its tests is 31,087, dragged down by the low-passmark API scores that are not directly comparable to OpenCL.

When checking nearest rivals, the MX570's closest match is the RTX 5080 Mobile at 38,349 (0.1% higher), followed by the RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135 (0.4% lower), the MX570 A at 38,691 (1% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38,706 (1.1% higher). For the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, the nearest rival is the Quadro M5000 at 31,206 (0.4% lower), then the GRID M60-1Q at 31,220 (0.4% lower), the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell at 31,532 (1.4% higher), and the TITAN RTX at 31,676 (1.9% higher). These deltas are all within 2%, so the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average score is tightly clustered with those professional and high-end consumer parts. The MX570's OpenCL score, meanwhile, is nearly indistinguishable from the top mobile RTX parts, which is remarkable for a chip with a 15 W TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design generations and foundries. The MX570 is built on Ampere architecture, using the GA107S chip fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is Ada Lovelace, using the AD103 chip from TSMC on a 5 nm node, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, translating to 121.1 million per mm². That is a density advantage of nearly 3x for the newer part, and the die is almost twice the size.

Core counts follow the same pattern. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Ray tracing cores are 16 versus 66, and Tensor cores are 64 versus 264. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's FP32 throughput is 44.10 TFLOPS, while the MX570 manages 4.731 TFLOPS, a factor of about 9.3. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MX570's FP16 is 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1), and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's is 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1), so there is no half-rate penalty on either.

Memory is a stark divide. The MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, yielding 672.3 GB/s, which is exactly 7x the bandwidth. Clock speeds are also far apart: the MX570 has a base of 832 MHz and boost of 1155 MHz, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. The memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) on the MX570 versus 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The higher effective data rate on the newer card, combined with the wider bus, explains the bandwidth gap.

Power and physical specs differ as much as performance. The MX570 is rated at 15 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a slot width of "IGP" and display outputs that are portable-device dependent. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card with a 285 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 600 W. Its dimensions are 310 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the MX570 and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, so the desktop card gets double the lanes for data transfer. The MX570 is from the GeForce MX (5xx) generation, released in December 2021, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is from the GeForce 40-series, released in January 2024, with a predecessor of GeForce 30 and successor of GeForce 50.

Where Each One Wins

The straightforward answer is that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins every recorded benchmark where both are present. The MX570's single OpenCL score of 38,299 is respectable for its class, but it is a mobile, low-power part designed for thin laptops, not desktop rendering or gaming. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's OpenCL result is 199,267, so any workload that relies on general-purpose compute will heavily favor the desktop card. The recorded wins count is 1 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 0 for the MX570.

Where the MX570 might appear to "win" is in efficiency and form factor, though the data does not directly measure performance per watt. With a 15 W TDP versus 285 W, the MX570 draws 19x less power, making it suitable for fanless or ultraportable designs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER requires a 600 W PSU and a triple-slot cooler, so it is not an option for small chassis or battery-powered devices. The MX570's 81st percentile ranking also suggests it outperforms most integrated graphics and older discrete mobile GPUs, which is a niche victory. However, in any absolute performance comparison, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher OpenCL score?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 versus the MX570's 38,299, a delta of 80.8% in favor of the desktop card.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X, while the MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6. The bandwidth is 672.3 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s.

Q: Are they from the same architecture?

A: No. The MX570 is Ampere on an 8 nm Samsung process, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is Ada Lovelace on a 5 nm TSMC process.

Q: How do their transistor counts compare?

A: The MX570 has 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 45,900 million on a 379 mm² die.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 ray tracing cores, compared to 16 on the MX570.

Q: What is the TDP of each?

A: The MX570 is rated at 15 W, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is rated at 285 W. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also requires a 600 W suggested PSU.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in a completely different performance class. Its OpenCL score is 80.8% higher than the MX570, and it carries 4x the shading units, 4x the TMUs, 3x the ROPs, and over 4x the ray tracing cores. The 16 GB memory buffer with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth dwarfs the 2 GB and 96.00 GB/s of the MX570, making the desktop card suitable for large textures and high-resolution workloads. The MX570 is an end-of-life mobile part that performs like a mid-range laptop GPU, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, though also end-of-life, sits near the top of the desktop stack.

For a user building a desktop PC with a dedicated slot for a triple-slot card, a 600 W PSU, and a need for high-end gaming or compute, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option between these two. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and 264 Tensor cores provide serious compute headroom. For a user constrained to a thin laptop with no discrete power connector, the MX570 is the only feasible choice, and its 81st percentile ranking shows it outperforms most integrated graphics. There is no middle ground: pick the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER for performance, or the MX570 for portability. The record shows zero wins for the MX570 in any head-to-head, so any decision should rest on power and physical constraints, not performance expectations.

Specification Differences

| Specification | MX570 | RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 5 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 43.5M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 832 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus | 64 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 64 | 264 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | 264 |

| Pixel Rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.731 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | N/A | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm |

| Release Date | 2021-12-16 | 2024-01-23 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 799 USD |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |