NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains one direct benchmark comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570: Geekbench OpenCL. The RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 points, while the MX570 scores 38,299 points. This represents a 362% advantage for the RTX 4070 Ti, a decisive margin that places the two products in entirely different performance tiers.

Context from the database's nearest rival data reinforces this gap. The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44,795, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152 average score, 0.8% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, 1.3% behind), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44,075, 1.6% ahead), and the Intel Arc A730M (45,592, 1.7% behind). The RTX 4070 Ti is thus clustered within roughly 2% of several high-end workstation and mobile parts, indicating that its average score sits in a competitive band near the top of the database.

The MX570, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 38,299, placing it in the 81st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38,349, 0.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135, 0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A (38,691, 1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38,706, 1.1% behind). Despite being an entry-level mobile part, the MX570's average score sits within roughly 1% of several mobile RTX-class GPUs in the database, which reflects the compression of scores at this lower performance band rather than parity with the RTX 4070 Ti.

The single head-to-head result is unambiguous. The RTX 4070 Ti wins the only shared test by 362%, and the gap between their average scores (44,795 versus 38,299) is about 17%. However, the average score comparison understates the real distance: the Geekbench OpenCL result, which is the only test both parts took, shows the RTX 4070 Ti delivering more than four and a half times the raw compute score of the MX570. No other benchmark overlaps exist in the database, so the head-to-head analysis rests on this single data point, but the magnitude of the delta leaves no room for ambiguity.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4070 Ti is built on the AD104 chip using NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip with the older Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. This process gap is substantial: the RTX 4070 Ti packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million transistors per mm². The MX570 contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti therefore has roughly four times the transistor count and nearly three times the density, which explains much of its compute advantage.

The memory subsystems diverge sharply. The RTX 4070 Ti ships with 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a 5.25x bandwidth advantage for the RTX 4070 Ti, consistent with its much larger compute pipeline.

Core counts follow the same pattern. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 60 ray tracing cores, and 240 tensor cores. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 ray tracing cores, and 64 tensor cores. The RTX 4070 Ti has 3.75x the shading units, 3.75x the TMUs, 2.5x the ROPs, 3.75x the ray tracing cores, and 3.75x the tensor cores. The resulting throughput figures are equally lopsided: the RTX 4070 Ti reaches 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the MX570 reaches 4.731 TFLOPS in both, a ratio of about 8.5x.

Clock behavior also differs. The RTX 4070 Ti has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, with memory at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The MX570 has a base of 832 MHz and a boost of 1155 MHz, with memory at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The RTX 4070 Ti's higher clocks compound its core count advantage.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so feature-level API support is identical. The RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot, 285 W card with a 16-pin power connector and a suggested 600 W PSU, while the MX570 is an IGP-class part with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU listed. The RTX 4070 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface; the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 4070 Ti provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the MX570's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44,795, compared to 38,299 for the MX570, a difference of about 17%.

Q: How large is the gap in the only shared benchmark?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 versus 38,299 for the MX570, a 362% advantage.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has a 285 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin connector. The MX570 has a 15 W TDP and no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti offers 504.2 GB/s over a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6X. The MX570 offers 96.00 GB/s over a 64-bit bus with 2 GB of GDDR6.

Q: Are these GPUs still in production?

A: No, both are listed as end-of-life in the database.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |

| Process node | 5 nm (TSMC) | 8 nm (Samsung) |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | 8,700 million |

| Die size | 294 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Transistor density | 121.8M / mm² | 43.5M / mm² |

| Base clock | 2310 MHz | 832 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2610 MHz | 1155 MHz |

| Memory clock | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 12 GB GDDR6X | 2 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory bus | 192 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |

| Shading units | 7680 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 240 | 64 |

| ROPs | 80 | 32 |

| Ray tracing cores | 60 | 16 |

| Tensor cores | 240 | 64 |

| Pixel rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 40.09 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 285 W | 15 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | Not listed |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable device dependent |

| Dimensions | 285 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm | Not listed |

| Release date | 2023-01-02 | 2021-12-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 799 USD | Not listed |

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins every category where data exists. It is faster in the only shared benchmark by 362%, has a higher average score, higher percentile ranking (84th versus 81st), more memory, more bandwidth, more cores, higher clocks, and higher throughput in every measured rate. It also supports the same API set as the MX570, so there is no feature advantage for the smaller part.

The MX570's only meaningful wins are in power and physical footprint. Its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the RTX 4070 Ti's 285 W, and it requires no power connectors or suggested PSU. It is an IGP-class part with no listed dimensions, meaning it is designed for portable devices where the RTX 4070 Ti's dual-slot, 285 mm card cannot fit. The MX570 also uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface versus the RTX 4070 Ti's x16, which is consistent with its lower bandwidth needs.

For users who need raw compute, the RTX 4070 Ti is the clear choice. Its FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS is about 8.5x the MX570's 4.731 TFLOPS, and its 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is over 5x higher. For battery-powered laptops or ultraportable systems where power draw and physical space are the primary constraints, the MX570 is the only viable option of the two, since the RTX 4070 Ti's 285 W TDP and dual-slot design cannot be integrated into such devices.

The Verdict

The data points to a complete mismatch. The RTX 4070 Ti outperforms the MX570 by 362% in the only shared benchmark, has roughly 17% higher average score, and leads in every architectural specification: transistor count, die size, core counts, clock speeds, memory capacity, bandwidth, and throughput. Its 84th percentile ranking versus the MX570's 81st percentile is a small gap in percentile terms, but that is a function of the database's scoring distribution, not a sign of parity.

The RTX 4070 Ti is the choice for any desktop or high-performance scenario where power delivery and physical space are available. It carries a launch MSRP of 799 USD and is end-of-life, so it is a legacy high-end part. The MX570 is the choice for portable, low-power devices: 15 W TDP, no external power, IGP form factor, and portable-device-dependent outputs make it a fit for thin laptops. It is also end-of-life.

There is no middle ground in the recorded data. The RTX 4070 Ti is superior in every measurable compute metric, while the MX570 is superior only in power efficiency and form factor suitability. A buyer choosing between these two should decide based on the target device class, not on performance, because the performance gap is decisive and one-sided.