NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The Verdict
The data presents an unambiguous hierarchy: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is in a completely different performance class than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A. Based on the recorded database measurements, the RTX 5070 Ti wins every head-to-head benchmark, with both wins being decisive. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against 39,780 for the MX570 A, a margin of 433.8%. In Geekbench Vulkan, the lead expands to 498.7%, with scores of 225,122 versus 37,601. The MX570 A does not claim a single benchmark victory.
For a user deciding between these two, the choice is driven entirely by the intended workload and platform constraints. The RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop-class, dual-slot add-in card with a 300 W TDP and a 16-pin power connector, designed for high-performance gaming and compute tasks. The MX570 A, by contrast, is an integrated-class mobile GPU with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs, suited for thin-and-light laptops with modest graphics demands. The benchmark data suggests that anyone prioritizing raw graphics throughput should select the RTX 5070 Ti, while the MX570 A is the only option for ultra-low-power, space-constrained systems where the RTX 5070 Ti physically cannot fit or be powered.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and foundries. The RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The MX570 A uses the older Ampere architecture with the GA107SB chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. This process gap is substantial: the RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The MX570 A has only 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti has more than five times the transistor count and nearly double the die area.
Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti runs at a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the MX570 A operates at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory configurations are equally distinct: the RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the MX570 A.
The compute resources tell the same story. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, alongside 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists, but the underlying hardware capacity is vastly different.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database records only two common benchmark results for these GPUs, and both heavily favor the RTX 5070 Ti. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363, which is 433.8% higher than the MX570 A's 39,780. This test typically stresses general-purpose compute across the GPU's shader cores, and the delta reflects the RTX 5070 Ti's 8,960 shading units versus 2,048, as well as its higher clock speeds and memory bandwidth.
In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122, while the MX570 A scores 37,601. The delta here is 498.7%, even larger than the OpenCL gap. Vulkan is a low-overhead graphics API, and the RTX 5070 Ti's advantage in texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s) likely explains the expanded margin.
The RTX 5070 Ti also has a much broader benchmark footprint in the database. It has recorded scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (6,604), Passmark DirectX 10 (192), DirectX 11 (300), DirectX 12 (127), DirectX 9 (351), G2D (1,332), G3D (32,974), and GPU Compute (20,203). The MX570 A only has the two Geekbench entries. This means the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49,957 is based on 10 tests, while the MX570 A's average of 38,691 is based on just 2 tests.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU is faster in OpenCL compute workloads?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti is 433.8% faster, scoring 212,363 versus 39,780 in Geekbench OpenCL.
Q: How large is the Vulkan performance gap?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti leads by 498.7%, with a score of 225,122 compared to 37,601 for the MX570 A.
Q: Do both GPUs support the same modern graphics APIs?
A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: What is the memory capacity difference?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7, while the MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average score of 49,957 across 10 benchmarks, while the MX570 A averages 38,691 across 2 benchmarks. The RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and the MX570 A is at the 81st percentile.
Q: Can the MX570 A be used in a desktop tower?
A: The MX570 A is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no dimensions listed, no power connectors, and a 25 W TDP, making it unsuitable for standard desktop expansion slots. The RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot, 304 mm long card requiring a 700 W suggested PSU.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measured category. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is essential for high-resolution textures and large datasets, which the MX570 A's 2 GB GDDR6 and 96.00 GB/s cannot handle. The RTX 5070 Ti's FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the MX570 A's 4.731 TFLOPS, making it suited for scientific computing, AI inference, and heavy 3D rendering. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores on the RTX 5070 Ti enable ray-traced lighting and DLSS-style upscaling, while the MX570 A's 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores provide only a baseline level of these features.
The MX570 A's only advantages are in power and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5070 Ti's 300 W, and it requires no external power connectors, making it viable for fanless or passively cooled designs. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is narrower than the RTX 5070 Ti's PCIe 5.0 x16, but that is irrelevant for its target use case. The MX570 A is also marked as end-of-life in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti is active production.
For gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti's Passmark G3D score of 32,974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,604 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance. The MX570 A has no DirectX 12 benchmark recorded, so its gaming capability cannot be quantified, but its hardware specs suggest it is limited to esports or older titles at low settings. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a higher percentile rank (86th versus 81st), meaning it outperforms a larger share of all GPUs in the database.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ in nearly every hardware field. The RTX 5070 Ti is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the MX570 A uses Samsung's 8 nm node. Transistor counts are 45,600 million versus 8,700 million, and die sizes are 378 mm² versus 200 mm². The RTX 5070 Ti's base clock is 2295 MHz, its boost is 2452 MHz, and its memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The MX570 A operates at 832 MHz base, 1155 MHz boost, and 1500 MHz memory (12 Gbps effective).
Memory differences are stark: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 43.94 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti and 4.731 TFLOPS on the MX570 A.
Power and form factor also differ completely. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, dual-slot width, a 16-pin power connector, a 700 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width. The MX570 A has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no listed dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has portable-device-dependent outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the MX570 A has no launch MSRP recorded.