NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A

CORE STATE GA107SB
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1155 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
39,780
212,363
geekbench_vulkan
37,601
225,122
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,604
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

The Verdict

The data presents an unambiguous hierarchy: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is in a completely different performance class than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A. Based on the recorded database measurements, the RTX 5070 Ti wins every head-to-head benchmark, with both wins being decisive. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against 39,780 for the MX570 A, a margin of 433.8%. In Geekbench Vulkan, the lead expands to 498.7%, with scores of 225,122 versus 37,601. The MX570 A does not claim a single benchmark victory.

For a user deciding between these two, the choice is driven entirely by the intended workload and platform constraints. The RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop-class, dual-slot add-in card with a 300 W TDP and a 16-pin power connector, designed for high-performance gaming and compute tasks. The MX570 A, by contrast, is an integrated-class mobile GPU with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs, suited for thin-and-light laptops with modest graphics demands. The benchmark data suggests that anyone prioritizing raw graphics throughput should select the RTX 5070 Ti, while the MX570 A is the only option for ultra-low-power, space-constrained systems where the RTX 5070 Ti physically cannot fit or be powered.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and foundries. The RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The MX570 A uses the older Ampere architecture with the GA107SB chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. This process gap is substantial: the RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The MX570 A has only 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti has more than five times the transistor count and nearly double the die area.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti runs at a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the MX570 A operates at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory configurations are equally distinct: the RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the MX570 A.

The compute resources tell the same story. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, alongside 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists, but the underlying hardware capacity is vastly different.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records only two common benchmark results for these GPUs, and both heavily favor the RTX 5070 Ti. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363, which is 433.8% higher than the MX570 A's 39,780. This test typically stresses general-purpose compute across the GPU's shader cores, and the delta reflects the RTX 5070 Ti's 8,960 shading units versus 2,048, as well as its higher clock speeds and memory bandwidth.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122, while the MX570 A scores 37,601. The delta here is 498.7%, even larger than the OpenCL gap. Vulkan is a low-overhead graphics API, and the RTX 5070 Ti's advantage in texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s) likely explains the expanded margin.

The RTX 5070 Ti also has a much broader benchmark footprint in the database. It has recorded scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (6,604), Passmark DirectX 10 (192), DirectX 11 (300), DirectX 12 (127), DirectX 9 (351), G2D (1,332), G3D (32,974), and GPU Compute (20,203). The MX570 A only has the two Geekbench entries. This means the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49,957 is based on 10 tests, while the MX570 A's average of 38,691 is based on just 2 tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in OpenCL compute workloads?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti is 433.8% faster, scoring 212,363 versus 39,780 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: How large is the Vulkan performance gap?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti leads by 498.7%, with a score of 225,122 compared to 37,601 for the MX570 A.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7, while the MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average score of 49,957 across 10 benchmarks, while the MX570 A averages 38,691 across 2 benchmarks. The RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and the MX570 A is at the 81st percentile.

Q: Can the MX570 A be used in a desktop tower?

A: The MX570 A is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no dimensions listed, no power connectors, and a 25 W TDP, making it unsuitable for standard desktop expansion slots. The RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot, 304 mm long card requiring a 700 W suggested PSU.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measured category. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is essential for high-resolution textures and large datasets, which the MX570 A's 2 GB GDDR6 and 96.00 GB/s cannot handle. The RTX 5070 Ti's FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the MX570 A's 4.731 TFLOPS, making it suited for scientific computing, AI inference, and heavy 3D rendering. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores on the RTX 5070 Ti enable ray-traced lighting and DLSS-style upscaling, while the MX570 A's 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores provide only a baseline level of these features.

The MX570 A's only advantages are in power and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5070 Ti's 300 W, and it requires no external power connectors, making it viable for fanless or passively cooled designs. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is narrower than the RTX 5070 Ti's PCIe 5.0 x16, but that is irrelevant for its target use case. The MX570 A is also marked as end-of-life in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti is active production.

For gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti's Passmark G3D score of 32,974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,604 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance. The MX570 A has no DirectX 12 benchmark recorded, so its gaming capability cannot be quantified, but its hardware specs suggest it is limited to esports or older titles at low settings. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a higher percentile rank (86th versus 81st), meaning it outperforms a larger share of all GPUs in the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every hardware field. The RTX 5070 Ti is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the MX570 A uses Samsung's 8 nm node. Transistor counts are 45,600 million versus 8,700 million, and die sizes are 378 mm² versus 200 mm². The RTX 5070 Ti's base clock is 2295 MHz, its boost is 2452 MHz, and its memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The MX570 A operates at 832 MHz base, 1155 MHz boost, and 1500 MHz memory (12 Gbps effective).

Memory differences are stark: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 43.94 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti and 4.731 TFLOPS on the MX570 A.

Power and form factor also differ completely. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, dual-slot width, a 16-pin power connector, a 700 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width. The MX570 A has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no listed dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has portable-device-dependent outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the MX570 A has no launch MSRP recorded.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
MX570 A
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
8,960 +337.5%
Shaders
2,048
8,960 +337.5%
TMUs
64
280 +337.5%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
SM Count
16
70 +337.5%
Clocks
Base Clock
832 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
2 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
16,384 +700.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
96.00 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
36.96 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
73.92 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
73.92 GFLOPS (1:64)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS (1:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
70 +337.5%
Tensor Cores
64
280 +337.5%
Power
TDP
25 W
300 W
TDP (W)
25
300 +1100.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA107SB
GB203
Generation
GeForce MX (5xx)
GeForce 50
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
45,600 million
Die Size
200 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
749 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View GeForce MX570 A Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details