NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A represent two entirely different tiers of the GPU market, and the benchmark data confirms a substantial performance gulf between them. The RTX 5070, a desktop powerhouse from the GeForce 50-series, and the MX570 A, an end-of-life mobile IGP solution, are separated by architecture, process node, and raw compute capability. While the MX570 A holds its own in its intended ultra-low-power segment, the head-to-head data shows a decisive victory for the RTX 5070, with performance deltas that underscore their divergent design goals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between these two GPUs is limited to two compute-oriented tests, but the results are unambiguous. In the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, the RTX 5070 scores 172,660 points, while the MX570 A manages 39,780 points. This represents a 334% advantage for the RTX 5070, meaning it delivers more than four times the raw compute performance in this test. The RTX 5070’s lead is even more pronounced in the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark, where it scores 178,923 points against the MX570 A’s 37,601 points. Here, the delta expands to 375.8%, a gap that reflects not only the massive difference in shading units and memory bandwidth but also the architectural efficiency of the newer Blackwell 2.0 design over the older Ampere architecture.

These results are not close, and the wins tally reflects that: the RTX 5070 wins both head-to-head tests, while the MX570 A secures none. The magnitude of the victory is worth emphasizing—a 334% to 375.8% performance advantage in compute workloads is the kind of gap that separates a dedicated high-end desktop card from an entry-level mobile part. When placed against their respective peer groups, the scores also tell a story of positioning. The RTX 5070’s average benchmark score of 40,377 places it just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40,318) and 2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568). The MX570 A’s average score of 38,691 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38,706) and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (38,299). In essence, the RTX 5070 competes in a higher performance bracket, while the MX570 A sits at the lower end of the spectrum, despite both cards holding similar percentile rankings (82nd vs. 81st percentile versus all GPUs).

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 is the clear winner for any workload that stresses raw compute throughput, graphics rendering, or modern API features. Its 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is nearly 6.5 times the MX570 A’s 4.731 TFLOPS, and this advantage translates directly to higher frame rates in gaming, faster rendering in 3D applications, and quicker results in GPU-accelerated compute tasks. The 12 GB GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that dwarfs the MX570 A’s 96.00 GB/s from its 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. For memory-intensive workloads—high-resolution textures, large datasets, or complex shaders—the RTX 5070’s bandwidth advantage is decisive. With 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, it also handles ray tracing and AI workloads natively, capabilities that are nominal at best on the MX570 A despite its 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores.

The MX570 A, conversely, wins on power efficiency and form factor. Its 25 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5070’s 250 W, and its IGP slot width with no power connectors makes it suitable for ultra-thin laptops where space and thermal headroom are at a premium. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the MX570 A’s score of 39,780 shows it can handle basic compute tasks, and its 81st percentile ranking indicates it outperforms a majority of all GPUs in the database, which includes many older or lower-end parts. For users whose primary need is a GPU for everyday productivity, light photo editing, or casual gaming, the MX570 A provides a baseline level of acceleration without the bulk or power draw of a discrete card. The data does not show it winning any performance tests, but its value proposition lies in what it enables in terms of portability and battery life—not in raw benchmark scores.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is fundamental. The RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a chip named GB205 that contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter, a figure that reflects the modern manufacturing technology and the sheer scale of the compute resources packed into the chip. The MX570 A, in contrast, uses the older Ampere architecture manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. Its GA107SB chip houses 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of just 43.5 million per square millimeter—less than half that of the RTX 5070. The process node advantage alone explains a significant portion of the performance gap, as the smaller node allows for higher clock speeds and better power efficiency.

Clock speeds further differentiate the two. The RTX 5070 operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and boosts to 2512 MHz, while the MX570 A runs at a much more conservative 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. This nearly 2.2x boost clock advantage, combined with 6144 shading units versus 2048, gives the RTX 5070 a massive throughput advantage. The memory subsystems are equally divergent: the RTX 5070 uses GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the MX570 A uses GDDR6 at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The RTX 5070’s memory bus is 192-bit versus 64-bit, leading to a 7x difference in bandwidth. Pixel and texture rates follow suit, with the RTX 5070 achieving 201.0 GPixel/s and 482.3 GTexel/s compared to the MX570 A’s 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the RTX 5070’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides significantly more bandwidth to the host system than the MX570 A’s PCIe 4.0 x8 link.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, with 30.87 TFLOPS FP32, is roughly 6.5 times faster than the MX570 A’s 4.731 TFLOPS FP32, as reflected in its 334% higher Geekbench OpenCL score.

Q: Is the MX570 A suitable for modern gaming?

A: The MX570 A supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 2 GB GDDR6 memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are severely limiting for modern titles. Its 36.96 GPixel/s pixel rate and 73.92 GTexel/s texture rate are far below the RTX 5070’s 201.0 GPixel/s and 482.3 GTexel/s.

Q: What is the performance difference in Vulkan workloads?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 scores 178,923 versus 37,601 for the MX570 A, a 375.8% advantage. This indicates a massive lead in API-level performance for the RTX 5070.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 5070 has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply with a 1x 16-pin connector, while the MX570 A has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors, designed for portable devices.

Q: Which GPU is more recent?

A: The RTX 5070 was released on 2025-03-03, with an active production status. The MX570 A was released on 2021-12-16 and is now end-of-life.

Q: How do they rank against all other GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 sits in the 82nd percentile, while the MX570 A is in the 81st percentile. Despite similar rankings, the RTX 5070’s average score of 40,377 is notably higher than the MX570 A’s 38,691.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the superior GPU in every measurable performance metric. Its 334-375.8% lead in head-to-head benchmarks, combined with a 6.5x advantage in FP32 throughput and a 7x advantage in memory bandwidth, makes it the obvious choice for any user prioritizing gaming, rendering, or compute workloads. The RTX 5070’s 12 GB GDDR7 memory, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores provide a feature set that the MX570 A cannot match, and its 82nd percentile ranking against all GPUs places it in the upper echelon of available hardware. The MX570 A, with its 81st percentile and 25 W TDP, is a capable IGP for low-power laptops, but it is not a competitor to the RTX 5070 in any performance sense.

For a desktop user building a high-end system, the RTX 5070 is the clear pick, offering near-peer performance to the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (0.1% delta) while outclassing the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by 2%. For a laptop user needing a basic discrete GPU for everyday tasks, the MX570 A provides adequate acceleration at a fraction of the power draw, matching the AMD Radeon Pro 580X within 0% delta. There is no scenario where the MX570 A outperforms the RTX 5070 based on the benchmark data—the only reasons to choose it are mobility and power efficiency, not performance. The RTX 5070 is the definitive winner, with the data supporting its position as a high-performance desktop part and the MX570 A serving a completely different, low-power niche.