NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the MX570 A delivers 4.731 TFLOPS. That is roughly an 8.5x difference in raw shader throughput, with the RTX 4070 Ti holding a 344.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a 468.6% lead in Geekbench Vulkan.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between these two GPUs?**

A: The RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, yielding 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s. That is a 5.25x bandwidth advantage for the RTX 4070 Ti.

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?**

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, compared to 38691 for the MX570 A. This places the RTX 4070 Ti in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the MX570 A sits in the 81st percentile.

Q: What is the architecture generation of each GPU?**

A: The RTX 4070 Ti is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture (chip AD104) on a 5 nm TSMC process. The MX570 A is based on the Ampere architecture (chip GA107SB) on an 8 nm Samsung process.

Q: Does the MX570 A require a power connector?**

A: No, the MX570 A uses no power connectors and has a 25 W TDP, designed as an integrated graphics processor (IGP). The RTX 4070 Ti requires a single 16-pin connector and has a 285 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?**

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 60 RT cores, while the MX570 A has 16 RT cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs belong to different NVIDIA architectures and process nodes. The RTX 4070 Ti uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on TSMC's 5 nm node with chip AD104. The MX570 A uses the Ampere architecture on Samsung's 8 nm node with chip GA107SB. The transistor counts reflect a massive gap: the RTX 4070 Ti packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.8 million transistors per mm². The MX570 A has 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, at 43.5 million per mm².

Shader resources differ substantially. The RTX 4070 Ti carries 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti also has 240 tensor cores versus 64 on the MX570 A, and 60 RT cores versus 16. These structural differences translate directly into compute rates: the RTX 4070 Ti achieves 626.4 GTexel/s and 208.8 GPixel/s, while the MX570 A manages 73.92 GTexel/s and 36.96 GPixel/s.

Clock behavior also differs. The RTX 4070 Ti has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The MX570 A operates at a much lower 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory clock rates follow: the RTX 4070 Ti runs memory at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the MX570 A.

The bus interface diverges as well. The RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti is a high-throughput desktop GPU designed for demanding workloads. Its large memory pool (12 GB GDDR6X) and high bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) suit modern game titles, heavy compute tasks, and content creation. The 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it well above the median, and its nearest rivals in the database include the RTX 5090 Mobile (0.8% higher average score) and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (1.3% higher), which shows it competes with some of the fastest mobile and workstation parts available.

The MX570 A is a low-power integrated-class GPU for portable devices. With a 25 W TDP and no power connector, it fits in thin laptops where space and thermal limits are tight. Its 81st percentile ranking is still respectable, but its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (0% delta), RTX 5080 Mobile (0.9% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (1% lower). In the head-to-head, the MX570 A wins no benchmarks against the RTX 4070 Ti.

The RTX 4070 Ti wins decisively in every recorded comparison. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 176953 versus 39780, a 344.8% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 213808 versus 37601, a 468.6% advantage. The MX570 A might be sufficient for basic 2D tasks or light casual gaming, but the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the RTX 4070 Ti in these tests.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4070 Ti and MX570 A differ across every major specification:

• Process node: 5 nm (TSMC) vs 8 nm (Samsung)
• Transistors: 35,800 million vs 8,700 million
• Die size: 294 mm² vs 200 mm²
• Base clock: 2310 MHz vs 832 MHz
• Boost clock: 2610 MHz vs 1155 MHz
• Memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
• Memory type: GDDR6X vs GDDR6
• Memory bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit
• Memory bandwidth: 504.2 GB/s vs 96.00 GB/s
• Shading units: 7680 vs 2048
• TMUs: 240 vs 64
• ROPs: 80 vs 32
• RT cores: 60 vs 16
• Tensor cores: 240 vs 64
• Pixel rate: 208.8 GPixel/s vs 36.96 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
• FP32: 40.09 TFLOPS vs 4.731 TFLOPS
• TDP: 285 W vs 25 W
• Slot width: Dual-slot vs IGP
• Power connectors: 1x 16-pin vs None
• Suggested PSU: 600 W vs (none listed)
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x8
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a vs Portable Device Dependent
• Physical dimensions: 285 mm length, 112 mm height, 42 mm width vs (not listed)

The RTX 4070 Ti also has a launch MSRP of 799 USD. The MX570 A has no launch MSRP listed. The release dates differ: the RTX 4070 Ti launched on 2023-01-02, the MX570 A on 2021-12-16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes two direct head-to-head comparisons between the RTX 4070 Ti and the MX570A, both in the RTX 4070 Ti's favor.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176953, while the MX570 A scores 39780. That is a 344.8% difference, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti delivers about 4.45 times the compute performance in this OpenCL workload. The scale of the gap reflects not just the higher clock speeds (2610 MHz boost vs 1155 MHz boost) but also the far larger shader count (7680 vs 2048) and memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s vs 96.00 GB/s).

In Geekbench Vulkan, the margin expands further. The RTX 4070 Ti scores 213808, while the MX570 A scores 37601. That is a 468.6% delta, or roughly 5.69 times the performance. The RTX 4070 Ti benefits here from its larger memory capacity (12 GB vs 2 GB) and higher memory bandwidth, which matter for Vulkan workload memory access patterns. The MX570 A's 64-bit memory bus becomes a bottleneck in this test.

Across the full benchmark collection, the RTX 4070 Ti also shows strength in other tests, though head-to-head data only covers these two. The RTX 4070 Ti achieves 5024 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, 31624 in Passmark G3D, and 18396 in Passmark GPU compute. The MX570 A has no recorded scores for those tests in the database, but its two measured scores are far lower than the RTX 4070 Ti's equivalents.

The wins count is 2 for the RTX 4070 Ti, 0 for the MX570 A. The RTX 4070 Ti also benefits from a higher average benchmark score (44795 vs 38691) and a higher percentile (84% vs 81%). The MX570 A's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580X, scores essentially identical at 38706, which suggests the MX570 A is positioned for basic duties, not performance tiers. The RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile (0.8% lower) and the RTX A6000 (1.6% higher), indicating it competes in a performance tier many times higher than the MX570 A.

In summary, the data shows a complete defeat for the MX570 A in every recorded benchmark. The RTX 4070 Ti is the clear performance leader, with the MX570 A offering only power efficiency (25 W vs 285 W) and compact IGP form factor as advantages.