GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce MX350

CORE STATE GP107S
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1468 MHz
TDP 20 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Pascal
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
N/A
geekbench_opencl
31,285
8,689
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
13,077
passmark_directx_10
31
N/A
passmark_directx_11
73
N/A
passmark_directx_12
32
N/A
passmark_directx_9
97
N/A
passmark_g2d
969
N/A
passmark_g3d
7,615
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
3,719
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Analyzing the test data for the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD and NVIDIA's NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics, a distinct pattern develops. the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD reliably produces stronger performance in this testing. This performance superiority extends from substantial to remarkable relative to the individual benchmark. Such dependability attests to fundamental architectural superiority. Users wanting graphics capability would pay attention.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD moves even more ahead of NVIDIA's NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics. Its specialized cores manage demanding reflection calculations considerably more smoothly. Users looking for premium effects will seriously pick the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD. The real-time ray tracing advantage is substantial. Modern games continually leverage hardware RT features.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics is not overlooked entirely, however the frame rate deficit compared to the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD is challenging to dismiss. For cost-sensitive consumers, NVIDIA's NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics could nevertheless represent an option when its reduced cost adjusts for the lower capabilities. Nevertheless, for maximum rendering performance, the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD remains the obvious winner. The determination is evident. Capability chasers might gravitate toward the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
MX350
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
640 -16.7%
Shaders
768
640 -16.7%
TMUs
48
32 -33.3%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
5
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1468 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1752 MHz 7 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
56.06 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
512 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
1.879 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
Power
TDP
15 W
20 W
TDP (W)
15
20 +33.3%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Pascal
GPU Name
Strix Point
GP107S
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce MX (3xx)
Process Size
4 nm
14 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
3,300 million
Die Size
233 mm²
132 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
145.9M / mm²
25.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
6.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x4
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
View Radeon 880M Details View GeForce MX350 Details